- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
So if UGA had beaten Bama...
Posted on 12/3/23 at 4:56 pm
Posted on 12/3/23 at 4:56 pm
Texas would have gotten the #4 seed over FSU? I don't believe that for a second.
7
Posted on 12/3/23 at 4:57 pm to Addison Tiger
You shouldn’t. This wasn’t even a discussion until Bama won.
Having said that, I feel like Bama is an objectively better team than FSU without their starting quarterback. It was going to suck either way.
Having said that, I feel like Bama is an objectively better team than FSU without their starting quarterback. It was going to suck either way.
This post was edited on 12/3/23 at 4:59 pm
Posted on 12/3/23 at 4:58 pm to Addison Tiger
Probably not.
They had to put Texas in to get Bama in.
They had to put Texas in to get Bama in.
Posted on 12/3/23 at 4:59 pm to Addison Tiger
FSU: Undefeated with 2 top 15 wins
Texas: One loss with 1 top 15 win
There’s no honest debate to be had.
Texas: One loss with 1 top 15 win
There’s no honest debate to be had.
Posted on 12/3/23 at 4:59 pm to Addison Tiger
No they wouldn't have. FSU would be the 4 seed. 100%.
Posted on 12/3/23 at 5:02 pm to Vandergriff
Here’s the thing:
You HAVE to put in an undefeated P5 champ.
You HAVE to put in a 12-1 SEC champ who has the most top 15 wins, only loss was to one-loss team, and who knocked off GA in Atlanta.
You do not HAVE to put in a one-loss Big 12 champion.
Everyone became obsessed with the result of one game in September and lost their minds like a bunch of women.
You HAVE to put in an undefeated P5 champ.
You HAVE to put in a 12-1 SEC champ who has the most top 15 wins, only loss was to one-loss team, and who knocked off GA in Atlanta.
You do not HAVE to put in a one-loss Big 12 champion.
Everyone became obsessed with the result of one game in September and lost their minds like a bunch of women.
Posted on 12/3/23 at 5:03 pm to Addison Tiger
That’s a really good question
If Georgia wins
Georgia
Michigan
Washington
FSU
When Bama won
Michigan
Washington
Texas
Alabama.
That is what they should ask the committee. But ESPN and the committee are both bought and paid for.
If Georgia wins
Georgia
Michigan
Washington
FSU
When Bama won
Michigan
Washington
Texas
Alabama.
That is what they should ask the committee. But ESPN and the committee are both bought and paid for.
Posted on 12/3/23 at 5:05 pm to alajones
quote:
feel like Bama is an objectively better team than FSU without their starting quarterback. It was going to suck either way.
That doesn’t matter. Why even play the regular season if the most deserving teams don’t get in?
Posted on 12/3/23 at 5:08 pm to Jon Ham
Wrong again…
Posted on 12/3/23 at 5:09 pm to sparkinator
I would like to know if Auburn had beaten Bama and not shite the bed then Bama turns around and beats UGA, does the committee keep UGA in at 4 over FSU, or do they drop to 5 and UT and FSU get in.
I mean nothing about FSU has changed in that situation except UGA isn’t a conference champ.
I mean nothing about FSU has changed in that situation except UGA isn’t a conference champ.
This post was edited on 12/3/23 at 5:11 pm
Posted on 12/3/23 at 5:10 pm to dukke v
LOL “but muh H2H is the most Important thing!”
Posted on 12/3/23 at 5:10 pm to BOSCEAUX
Now this is a debate topic.
Posted on 12/3/23 at 5:32 pm to alajones
quote:
is an objectively better team
People really need to stop using the term “objective” incorrectly. “Better team” is not something that can be measured objectively. An objective measurement is how many wins/losses someone has, not who conventional wisdom may deem as better or worse. Not trying to single you out, but the word “objective” has begun be used as an unintelligent way to bolster subjective opinions of things
This post was edited on 12/3/23 at 7:21 pm
Posted on 12/3/23 at 5:35 pm to Addison Tiger
quote:
Texas would have gotten the #4 seed over FSU?
Texas was bootstrapped.
ESPN wanted the SEC champ in so bad...
But they had to bring Texas along to even remotely justify their corruption.
Posted on 12/3/23 at 5:45 pm to alajones
[quote]Having said that, I feel like Bama is an objectively better team than FSU[/quote
How can you say this after watching Alabama v. Auburn? You can’t. It’s a bias because Alabama has been good for so long.
How can you say this after watching Alabama v. Auburn? You can’t. It’s a bias because Alabama has been good for so long.
Posted on 12/3/23 at 6:15 pm to lsufball19
quote:I understand what you are saying, but I think there’s plenty of objective ways to measure performance in CFB. However, I don’t care to sit here and argue those point by point with anyone.
Not trying to single you out, but the word “objective” has begun be used as an unintelligent way a way to bolster subjective opinions of things
To those bringing up the Auburn game, Alabama has also looked really fricking impressive against some really good/great teams.
Posted on 12/3/23 at 6:35 pm to alajones
quote:
I understand what you are saying, but I think there’s plenty of objective ways to measure performance in CFB
But that’s not what happened today. The committee’s spokesperson literally said FSU is being left out because their QB is hurt.
Posted on 12/3/23 at 6:39 pm to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
The committee’s spokesperson literally said FSU is being left out because their QB is hurt.
That was just a convenient excuse.
Posted on 12/3/23 at 6:41 pm to lsufball19
quote:
People really need to stop using the term “objective” incorrectly. “Better team” is not something that can be measured objectively. An objective measurement is how many wins/losses someone has, not who conventional wisdom may deem as better or worse. Not trying to single you out, but the word “objective” has begun be used as an unintelligent way a way to bolster subjective opinions of things
Thank you for this.
Posted on 12/3/23 at 6:48 pm to OceanMan
quote:
People really need to stop using the term “objective” incorrectly. “Better team” is not something that can be measured objectively.
And this is exactly why they use “best four teams” as their measure, having a subjective measurement allows them to be logically inconsistent and get the result they want.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News