Started By
Message

re: So about that defensive holding call in the SB.....

Posted on 2/16/23 at 11:01 pm to
Posted by The Third Leg
Idiot Out Wandering Around
Member since May 2014
10056 posts
Posted on 2/16/23 at 11:01 pm to
Love that they freeze the video right at the jersey tug to make it look worse. He didn’t impede him much, and he wasn’t walking in. Mahomes was under duress and lobbed a bad ball 5-7yards past the target. If you think he was impeded near that, you’re out of your mind, but you already proved that with your relentless claim that “he had him on the ground.”

Did he tug his jersey? Yes, was it worthy of the call in that situation? Nah.
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
30247 posts
Posted on 2/16/23 at 11:05 pm to
I'm not a "the league is rigged" guy. In fact, I laugh at those dopes. However, that hold didn't impede JuJu and was a bullshite, ticky tack call if it happened in the first quarter, much less the final moments.
Posted by TackySweater
Member since Dec 2020
12061 posts
Posted on 2/16/23 at 11:22 pm to
quote:

call if it happened in the first quarter


Muh only call penalties in the first half

Lol
Posted by TackySweater
Member since Dec 2020
12061 posts
Posted on 2/16/23 at 11:23 pm to
quote:

Yes, was it worthy of the call in that situation? Nah.


Lol

Muh all penalties aren’t penalties
Posted by lsufanva
sandston virginia
Member since Aug 2009
12414 posts
Posted on 2/16/23 at 11:53 pm to
Don't really think anyone sane is denying it was a penalty. The question is should it have been called? While I didn't like the call in that moment I do believe the Chiefs earned the call. The previous 2 touchdowns were essentially on the same route the penalty was called on and were WIDE open. Reid owned the Eagles at the goal line(2nd half) and earned that penalty call. Chiefs improved defending it but were still beat on that play. Hence the hold.
Posted by TackySweater
Member since Dec 2020
12061 posts
Posted on 2/16/23 at 11:56 pm to
quote:

Reid owned the Eagles at the goal line(2nd half) and earned that penalty call.


Earned it how? With the refs?
Posted by Dalosaqy
I can't quite re
Member since Dec 2007
12314 posts
Posted on 2/17/23 at 1:11 am to
quote:

It had a clear impact on the play

No. A tricky tack call that had a clear impact on the game.
Posted by Stealth Matrix
29°59'55.98"N 90°05'21.85"W
Member since Aug 2019
7921 posts
Posted on 2/17/23 at 4:38 am to
NFL tells the refs before big games that they don't want a repeat of 2018, no matter what. So, the refs threw a flag in a situation where a decade ago past they wouldn't have. Now it's back to the drawing board once again.
Posted by tketaco
Sunnyside, Houston
Member since Jan 2010
19577 posts
Posted on 2/17/23 at 5:32 am to
It wasn't even a question of legit but the oh so convenient Madden Penalty Calling Afjustment made at the last two minutes. Either let things slide or don't.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95905 posts
Posted on 2/17/23 at 6:23 am to
Ok everyone. Show me all the plays where a db tugs and holds the WRs jersey at the break right in front of the ref and it wasn’t called

Apparently it happened 100 times in the game so it should be easy for y’all to post them all
Posted by oleyeller
Vols, Bitch
Member since Oct 2012
32022 posts
Posted on 2/17/23 at 6:24 am to
quote:

That HAD to be called. It had a clear impact on the play.


Lol no it didn’t


Yea we shouldnt call penalties at the end of games.


I mean, am i right saints fans. Or does that not apply when rams pass interference at the end of the playoff game?


Oooops. I guess it dont apply unless it helps a team you like
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65147 posts
Posted on 2/17/23 at 6:47 am to
Nah. We'll just wait on you to create another one of your patented spreadsheets.
Posted by Tiger Ugly
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
14544 posts
Posted on 2/17/23 at 6:53 am to
I think one interesting thing is that no one is arguing that it was not a hold. The main arguments you hear is either "you can't decide a game at the end like that" and "they were letting that go all game why call it now"?

From my perspective if the call is legit - and it was - no doubt - you can't really support the outrage over it, time to move on.

The first hold definitely altered both the route and the timing - and it appears clear to me....fairly significantly. The second was one that I could have seen being let go and if that had been the only one I could see the case being made as more legit.
Posted by mrbroker
Sylacauga Alabama
Member since Jul 2011
16575 posts
Posted on 2/17/23 at 7:01 am to
Bradberry admitted he tugged at the jersey and was hoping not to get caught. People like this video shows how stupid people are to keep on with it.
Posted by StatMaster
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
4293 posts
Posted on 2/17/23 at 7:16 am to
If Mahomes makes a decent throw on the play, JuJu walks into the end zone anyway. The “hold” occurred on the break and yet the WR ended up with 1-2 yards of separation at the end of the route. The “hold” obviously didn’t affect him that much. I get that it was technically a hold but it really didn’t affect the outcome of the play and it was a minimal hold at best. I don’t think it should’ve been called based on how the refs had been calling the game up to that point.
Posted by rlebl39
League City, TX
Member since Jun 2011
4740 posts
Posted on 2/17/23 at 7:19 am to
quote:

From my perspective if the call is legit - and it was - no doubt - you can't really support the outrage over it, time to move on.


I’m not outraged over the call. I think it was ticky tack and didn’t have an affect on the play but I don’t have a dog in the fight for this game so I really don’t care.

What has me legit losing my mind though is OP saying Bradberry had Juju on the ground.
Posted by Tigerpride18
Lakewood Colorado
Member since Sep 2017
29553 posts
Posted on 2/17/23 at 7:30 am to
quote:

More ad hominem attacks.


I love how this board loves to use this term that’s never used in conversation lol
This post was edited on 2/17/23 at 7:31 am
Posted by AwesomeSauce
Das Boot
Member since May 2015
7781 posts
Posted on 2/17/23 at 7:35 am to
quote:

That's why it's gonna be interesting to see what that crowd on here and elsewhere pivot to now.




You are underestimating how big a hypocrite the average NFL/SEC fan is.
Posted by Yeahright
On a big sphere out there.
Member since Sep 2018
1940 posts
Posted on 2/17/23 at 7:38 am to
The whole argument is..... If you haven't called but one, yes one holding call the whole game and have been letting both teams get away with it, then why call it at that moment?
Posted by MetroAtlantaGatorFan
Member since Jun 2017
15598 posts
Posted on 2/17/23 at 7:47 am to
Eagles fans/Chiefs haters have pointed out that a KC lineman committed hands to the face on Josh Sweat but you can also see here that Sweat himself committed hands to the the face during the hold. I can't remember, what happens if one team gets a penalty and the other team gets two penalties on the same play? Obviously 1:1 would offset but what about 1:2?

first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram