- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ryan Clark demands Shadeur be named the backup or that the browns trade him
Posted on 10/10/25 at 11:20 am to TTsTowel
Posted on 10/10/25 at 11:20 am to TTsTowel
quote:
Why reward the bum arse, controversial player by releasing him for potentially bad behavior?
So you would punish him by giving him a roster spot for 4 more years?
0
Posted on 10/10/25 at 11:21 am to TTsTowel
quote:Has Sanders actually done anything controversial in Cleveland? Outside of him mocking Rex Ryan?
Why reward the bum arse, controversial player by releasing him for potentially bad behavior?
Keep his arse on practice squad.
Also, what good does that do for Cleveland? Why do you want to keep, pay, and roster (in a sport with limited roster spots, each being as valuable as the next) a player as a punishment? Because the 60 year old NFL fans don't like his dad? How does that help your team win games or bring cohesion to a locker room?
Like do you see how stupid that logic is?
Posted on 10/10/25 at 11:24 am to Fun Bunch
my first thought was "I thought the Haslams were the owners, Ryan Clark must be an owner to make that kind of demand."
Reading comments above, I still don't know who Mr. Clark is, but he must have done something to have earned people's time to attend to what he says.
Or not.
Reading comments above, I still don't know who Mr. Clark is, but he must have done something to have earned people's time to attend to what he says.
Or not.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 11:26 am to Fun Bunch
quote:But that's not what he said at all.
RC's actual point is that Shadeur SHOULD be starting but Stefanski "don't mess with him"
He said it's Stefanski's team, it's his decision to make, and Stefanski doesn't "mess with him" as the outside public thinks he should. Everything there is accurate. This is the actual quote
quote:The whole point was Stefanski pretty obviously didn't want Sanders, ownership forced that move, and now Stefanski is stuck dealing with a problem he intentionally tried to avoid. It has never made sense, in the history of sports, for a player to be on a team where the head coach doesn't want him on that team.
“Clearly you’re playing for development, and it’s not to develop Shedeur as a future starter on your team. Too much comes with him if you don’t see him as a future starter of your team.”
"You have to understand with Shedeur Sanders it comes with more media attention and more scrutiny,” Clark said. “He’s going to be treated unlike anyone else in that locker room or anything else we see in the league.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 11:27 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
That is not the correct take. RC's actual point is that Shadeur SHOULD be starting but Stefanski "don't mess with him"
Not how I took it. But even if it was his point doesn't it still stand? If the coach doesn't think he can play or won't play hom, then get rid of him. How does keeping him help the team?
Posted on 10/10/25 at 11:28 am to Fun Bunch
Ryan Clark likes black people more than he does white people.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 11:29 am to PP7 for heisman
quote:
But that's not what he said at all.
Respectfully disagree.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 11:30 am to PP7 for heisman
quote:Your words, not mine.
Has Sanders actually done anything controversial in Cleveland?
quote:
cause division in the locker room and invite a media circus
Posted on 10/10/25 at 11:31 am to PP7 for heisman
quote:
The browns QB1 is hurt. They signed a 40 year old Flacco and drafted 2 high profile rookies. They traded the 40 year old. They named one of the high profile rookies the starter. Now the other high profile rookie is on the roster and people want to know he's QB2 or QB3. If he's QB3, it means he will never have a spot in the org and it's stupid for Cleveland to invite everything that comes with Sanders (as Clark said) into the locker room if he's never going to play.
Seems like he'd be QB2 just be default. Seems odd that he would be QB3 and then when they get rid of QB1 all of a sudden the practice squad QB is the backup.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 11:32 am to Fun Bunch
Also, Clark's entire point was not to trade Sanders for the benefit of Sanders because "he's not playing it's not fair!"
He's saying they need to part ways for the benefit of the Browns.
"If you don't see him as a future starter of your team, it's time to part ways. It's time to trade him. It's time to get him out of your locker room because if your plan is not to develop him as a future starter of your team, too much comes with him."
He's saying they need to part ways for the benefit of the Browns.
"If you don't see him as a future starter of your team, it's time to part ways. It's time to trade him. It's time to get him out of your locker room because if your plan is not to develop him as a future starter of your team, too much comes with him."
Posted on 10/10/25 at 11:34 am to PP7 for heisman
quote:
He's saying they need to part ways for the benefit of the Browns.
Because Kevin Stefanski is being stupid and not starting him.
Literally his point. If you can't read between the lines or interpret what RC says I don't know what to tell you.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 11:36 am to iwyLSUiwy
quote:You'd think that, but Cleveland has made it pretty clear since drafting him where he stood on the depth chart.
Seems like he'd be QB2 just be default. Seems odd that he would be QB3 and then when they get rid of QB1 all of a sudden the practice squad QB is the backup.
That's Clarks point. If he's not QB2 behind Gabriel, then why have him on the team? If he can't beat out Bailey Zappe, then there's no reason at all for him to be rostered.
He even said that Stefanski should "give a Shadeur reason" or "give a Zappe reason" to get the media and fans off his back.
Everyone knows Stefanski didn't want this.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 11:37 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
Ryan Clark demands
Who the F cares what he "demands." Lol these guys, and especially RC, think they have some sort of power or say in the matter.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 11:37 am to Fun Bunch
He's the ESPN version of Jasmine Crockett
Posted on 10/10/25 at 11:38 am to PP7 for heisman
quote:This is a dumb take. Sanders is a rookie with no value to other teams. Clark should shut up. Browns are Sanders him a favor.
It's time to trade him.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 11:39 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
Literally his point. If you can't read between the lines or interpret what RC says I don't know what to tell you.
Fun Bunch,
Even if that is what he means isn't it still good advice? You think it's good to have your 3rd string qb causing distractions covered on multiple sports platforms?
This post was edited on 10/10/25 at 11:43 am
Posted on 10/10/25 at 11:40 am to Fun Bunch
quote:You're hearing what you want to hear.
Because Kevin Stefanski is being stupid and not starting him.
Literally his point. If you can't read between the lines or interpret what RC says I don't know what to tell you.
Clark literally called out Shedeur's play in the preseason.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 11:41 am to iwyLSUiwy
quote:
Seems like he'd be QB2 just be default. Seems odd that he would be QB3 and then when they get rid of QB1 all of a sudden the practice squad QB is the backup.
I thought that was basically his entire point. If the guy is going to be jumped by the practice squad QB there is no point to keeping him on the roster and he could be cut.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 11:42 am to 9Fiddy
Man I wish half of these reply guys would simply watch the video and listen to what he has to say instead of taking this click bait headline and running with it.
It's okay to hate Ryan Clark. It's dumb to complain about things he's not actually saying.
It's okay to hate Ryan Clark. It's dumb to complain about things he's not actually saying.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 11:52 am to PP7 for heisman
quote:
That's Clarks point. If he's not QB2 behind Gabriel, then why have him on the team? If he can't beat out Bailey Zappe, then there's no reason at all for him to be rostered.
Yea I didn't watch the video but that's kind of instantly what I thought when I saw the news they wouldn't name him QB2.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News