Started By
Message

re: Penn State NCAA Sanctions thread - announcement at 8 CST

Posted on 7/22/12 at 6:09 pm to
Posted by usc6158
Member since Feb 2008
39174 posts
Posted on 7/22/12 at 6:09 pm to
It's hard for me to imagine a TV ban being in there considering the implications for other Big-10 and OOC teams
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
29266 posts
Posted on 7/22/12 at 6:10 pm to
Here's another thing: Emmert wouldn't dare do this unless he had the support of the NCAA board of directors. You can be certain that he has their approval.

Here's who's on the board:

NCAA board members
Posted by Rocket
Member since Mar 2004
61117 posts
Posted on 7/22/12 at 6:11 pm to
quote:

They aren't THAT hurt...but it affects them.


Not that much

quote:

The bowl revenue, again, affects players.


To an extent.

quote:

They have a ton of teams participating under the NCAA banner now and major sanctions aren't frequent in the big picture. You can't stamp out everything.


Of course. And usually teams that are guilty of secondary violations and if they are self-reported, don't face major sanctions. But there is an incentive to self-report.

quote:

Which is the NCAA's fault


Not necessarily.

quote:

Not USC's or the current players.


It may not be fair for everyone involved but that's the better way to handle. The players aren't that impacted.

quote:

Like I said, I'm sure Bush and Carroll and the lot are just devastated and crushed that they hurt USC and can't find employment.


Either way, the NCAA can't do anything to Bush or Carroll now. But future players and leaders/coaches are on notice of what can happen if NCAA violations are committed.

Posted by Srbtiger06
Member since Apr 2006
29328 posts
Posted on 7/22/12 at 6:11 pm to
quote:

lol at the notion that accreditation isn't athletics. You can't even field a team if you aren't accredited.


Again, it isn't imminent like penalties are. It isn't the NCAA.

Athletics have ZERO bearing on accreditation.

No, you cannot be in the NCAA if you aren't accredited. Accreditation isn't the topic at hand though.
Posted by Srbtiger06
Member since Apr 2006
29328 posts
Posted on 7/22/12 at 6:13 pm to
quote:

Of course. And usually teams that are guilty of secondary violations and if they are self-reported, don't face major sanctions. But there is an incentive to self-report.


There would still be incentive to self-report.

quote:

Not necessarily.


How so?

quote:

It may not be fair for everyone involved but that's the better way to handle. The players aren't that impacted.


Meh. Agree to disagree. I just think there are other ways to handle it that don't affect current student-athletes.

quote:

Either way, the NCAA can't do anything to Bush or Carroll now.


So why punish others for their actions? Fine the program, put sanctions on any team that hires Carroll, and put USC on probation.
This post was edited on 7/22/12 at 6:15 pm
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
108387 posts
Posted on 7/22/12 at 6:14 pm to
quote:

It's hard for me to imagine a TV ban being in there considering the implications for other Big-10 and OOC teams


It's not unheard of. Kentucky had one in the 80s when Sutton and Co. got hit with violations.
Posted by OWLFAN86
Erotic Novelist
Member since Jun 2004
196928 posts
Posted on 7/22/12 at 6:14 pm to
quote:

No, you cannot be in the NCAA if you aren't accredited. Accreditation isn't the topic at hand though.
yet


I know I'm being repetitive here,,but there WILL be US Senate hearings on this

I'm not predicting that they lose accreditation but they will be threatened with it
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
62650 posts
Posted on 7/22/12 at 6:14 pm to
Auburn football had a TV (and postseason) ban in 1993. They went undefeated.
This post was edited on 7/22/12 at 6:16 pm
Posted by NBamaAlum
Soul Patrolville
Member since Jan 2009
27604 posts
Posted on 7/22/12 at 6:15 pm to
According to your link, Pres. Guy Bailey is on the board. I wonder if he stays on there after leaving Tx Tech to come to UA?
Posted by usc6158
Member since Feb 2008
39174 posts
Posted on 7/22/12 at 6:15 pm to
quote:

It's not unheard of. Kentucky had one in the 80s when Sutton and Co. got hit with violations.



Different time. In the current media environment, where everything is on TV and media rights deals are enormous, it would be a big blow to the rest of the conference
Posted by PowerTool
The dark side of the road
Member since Dec 2009
23258 posts
Posted on 7/22/12 at 6:20 pm to
quote:

Auburn football had a TV (and postseason) ban in 1993. They went undefeated.



We did it in '94.

I'm guessing the "fine" is lost revenue. $30-60 million is a big range, so I think they're probably guestimating based on future conference payouts for TV/post-season.
Posted by Rocket
Member since Mar 2004
61117 posts
Posted on 7/22/12 at 6:23 pm to
quote:

There would still be incentive to self-report.


But your penalties aren't severe enough

quote:

How so?


Because investigations take time.

quote:

just think there are other ways to handle it that don't affect current student-athletes.


There are others way. Don't think the penalties would be severe enough.

quote:

So why punish others for their actions?


They aren't that punished. Players on scholarship can still keep their scholarships. Loss of bowl play isn't that big of a deal. If you are going to get drafted, you are still going to get drafted.

The penalties, the way they are now, provide extra incentive not to violate rules.

Did you ever play football.......and when one player was dogging it, everybody had to run sprints? Kinda like that.
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
69124 posts
Posted on 7/22/12 at 6:27 pm to
quote:

Yahoo! Sports has reported that Emmert will be deciding on the sanctions personally, via "a special provision allowing such a step if he receives approval from the NCAA's board of directors." In lieu of the usual NCAA investigation, Emmert will be citing the Freeh report as "actionable evidence."


NCAA staaaaaacked
Penn State fuuuuuucked
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
29266 posts
Posted on 7/22/12 at 6:30 pm to
quote:

Srbtiger06
"Unprecedented" NCAA penalties for Penn State to be announced Mon. at 9AM EST
quote:
lol at the notion that accreditation isn't athletics. You can't even field a team if you aren't accredited.

Athletics have ZERO bearing on accreditation.


So you're too young to remember Jetgate,
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
29266 posts
Posted on 7/22/12 at 6:31 pm to
quote:

NBamaAlum
"Unprecedented" NCAA penalties for Penn State to be announced Mon. at 9AM EST
According to your link, Pres. Guy Bailey is on the board. I wonder if he stays on there after leaving Tx Tech to come to UA?


Good question. I don't know. Hope he does.
Posted by TDawg1313
WA
Member since Jul 2009
12468 posts
Posted on 7/22/12 at 6:31 pm to
Here's an interesting thread on a Penn State board. Someone asks if they should just leave the Big 10 and drop football altogether and pretty much everyone agrees that it would be a good idea. LINK
Posted by Srbtiger06
Member since Apr 2006
29328 posts
Posted on 7/22/12 at 6:36 pm to
quote:

But your penalties aren't severe enough


How so? A severe financial loss isn't incentive?

quote:

Because investigations take time.


Well that isn't the fault of the player that was born 4 years too late.

quote:

There are others way. Don't think the penalties would be severe enough.


If it's going to happen, it is going to happen. Coaches will try to win at all costs anyway. The NCAA doesn't have the power to punish them severely. They don't have the power to 'severely' punish the player committing the violation either. I don't see much reason to punish current players. The only real 'punishment' towards the actual offenders is that they'll be vilified. Big deal.

quote:

They aren't that punished. Players on scholarship can still keep their scholarships. Loss of bowl play isn't that big of a deal. If you are going to get drafted, you are still going to get drafted.


In most cases I can see the argument. The proposed penalties will wreck shite at PSU though. This goes farther than hampering the football team. This hits the entire AD HARD as well as the university.

quote:

Did you ever play football.......and when one player was dogging it, everybody had to run sprints? Kinda like that.


Except we never ran laps for a guy dogging it 5 years prior.
Posted by rocket31
Member since Jan 2008
41887 posts
Posted on 7/22/12 at 6:37 pm to
wow
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
62650 posts
Posted on 7/22/12 at 6:38 pm to
Damn it's sounding like the NCAA is gonna strip them down so badly and hold them hostage for so much that they would actually, literally, prefer the death penalty.
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
69098 posts
Posted on 7/22/12 at 6:41 pm to
Sorry if already posted. Wetzel paints a picture of Emmert as a guy who has been eagerly awaiting the chance to flex his nuts on someone or something.
LINK
Forde seems to think he's being overzealous, too.
LINK
This post was edited on 7/22/12 at 6:50 pm
Jump to page
Page First 56 57 58 59 60 ... 72
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 58 of 72Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram