- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
NFL to consider making roughing the passer subject to replay review
Posted on 3/4/21 at 10:35 am
Posted on 3/4/21 at 10:35 am
quote:
According to Judy Battista of NFL Media, owners could vote to make roughing the passer subject to replay review. On one hand, it’s necessary. On the other hand, pass interference calls and non-calls were subject to replay review for a year, and it was a disaster.
Given the way the rules are written, the replay process would entail scanning on a frame-by-frame basis any and all available angles for any and all potential instances of roughing based on broad, literal application of the rule. It would become, from a coach’s challenge perspective, a potential emergency option to extend a key drive. And for every interception, which makes the replay process automatic, part of the second look will entail checking to see whether any potential roughing the passer happened.
In support of the possibility of making roughing the passer subject to review, the item at NFL.com points to a horrendous roughing call that helped the Vikings beat the Lions in a Week 17 game to which no one paid any attention. Without replay review, the seemingly phantom call could not be reverse.
Still, while it’s a good idea in theory, the league potentially would be stepping on another rake given the manner in which the rule would be applied. It also could result in the same kind of shifting standard for what does and doesn’t result in a reversal of a ruling on the field, in the same way the bar for interference seemed to move up and down in 2019.
LINK
Posted on 3/4/21 at 10:36 am to RLDSC FAN
More review. Just what we all want. Awesome.
Posted on 3/4/21 at 10:36 am to RLDSC FAN
I say get rid of the penalty entirely.
Posted on 3/4/21 at 10:37 am to RLDSC FAN
just change the damn rule so its not so ticky tack instead of having to slow the game down to replay every time its called.
this fricking league
this fricking league
Posted on 3/4/21 at 10:37 am to RLDSC FAN
this would just be as bad as PI reviews were
Posted on 3/4/21 at 10:37 am to Pedro
Let's just make it touch or flag football
Posted on 3/4/21 at 10:38 am to Pedro
quote:
just change the damn rule so its not so ticky tack instead of having to slow the game down to replay every time its called.
this fricking league
Yea, eliminate the "any contact to the head" part of it. This isn't rocket science.
Posted on 3/4/21 at 10:41 am to nicholastiger
quote:
Let's just make it touch or flag football
Yup. Clown league
Posted on 3/4/21 at 10:43 am to jlovel7
quote:
I say get rid of the penalty entirely.
Each team should get 1 review challenge. Challenge ANYTHING they want.. holding, PI.. everything is subject to being challenged.. Win or Lose your challenge is done... this would speed the game up because, no one is wasting a challenge early in the game on a play that would make a 5yd difference...Coaches would be forced to be more strategic and only challenge plays that really mattered
Posted on 3/4/21 at 10:44 am to RLDSC FAN
They should review why they’re hemorrhaging viewership.
Posted on 3/4/21 at 10:45 am to RLDSC FAN
At this point, I am in favor of getting rid of replay entirely and just living with the results. The game isn't as exciting when you can't live in the moment of a big play.
Posted on 3/4/21 at 10:47 am to RLDSC FAN
Leave it to a fan vote. Brady will never get another call in his life
Posted on 3/4/21 at 10:51 am to RLDSC FAN
the NFL is stupid in making the on the field refs do the reviews. The booth ref is the way to go.
Posted on 3/4/21 at 11:25 am to RLDSC FAN
Somebody needs to do a replay review of Roger Goodell's tenure as commissioner
Posted on 3/4/21 at 11:30 am to jlovel7
quote:
say get rid of the penalty entirely.
Would be even worse. Will be a roulette of take out the QB with no disincentive.
Posted on 3/4/21 at 11:31 am to RLDSC FAN
I wouldn't mind it if they did it like a touchdown or turnover challenge and just have someone in the booth or the hub in New York or whatever look at it, as long as it isn't a coach's challenge.
Posted on 3/4/21 at 11:32 am to CaptainBrannigan
quote:
The booth ref is the way to go.
Agreed
And they should be constantly reviewing plays immediately after they occur so by the time a coach initiates an official challenge, a decision has likely already been made.
So frustrating to watch these "reviews" delay the game for 3-5 minutes when everyone watching at home can make a decision 20 seconds after a disputed call.
Posted on 3/4/21 at 11:39 am to RLDSC FAN
OMG - just play the fricking game.
Posted on 3/4/21 at 11:42 am to TheeRealCarolina
quote:better have some depth
Will be a roulette of take out the QB with no disincentive.
The PI reviews could have went well, but refs’ egos got in the way
This post was edited on 3/4/21 at 11:44 am
Posted on 3/4/21 at 11:52 am to chalmetteowl
This will actually give Al Riveron's Merry Band of Idiots more cover I feel.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News