- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Myles Garrett traded to the Rams
Posted on 6/1/26 at 1:23 pm to whatiknowsofar
Posted on 6/1/26 at 1:23 pm to whatiknowsofar
Worth it for rams, Jared verse is really good and he can potentially will be dpoy caliber, but Garrett with that line is absurd
Posted on 6/1/26 at 1:24 pm to htran90
Posted on 6/1/26 at 1:25 pm to Friendly Satan
quote:
a-hole should be rotting in jail
quote:
Friendly Satan
Posted on 6/1/26 at 1:34 pm to Proximo
Posted on 6/1/26 at 1:36 pm to Proximo
April fools
Nope.
League controlled by NFLA Rams
Nope.
League controlled by NFLA Rams
Posted on 6/1/26 at 1:38 pm to RandySavage
quote:
Makes it even weirder they drafted Ty Simpson when all other indications are that they are pushing all their chips in this season.
One could also say that if the Rams think they have their QB post-Stafford then that gives them the flexibility to move picks and not have to hold onto them for better draft position next year.
Posted on 6/1/26 at 1:53 pm to PCRammer
One would have to assume the rams picks will be near the end of each round barring a collapse so it’s a solid deal for them…I mean didn’t the jets get two first rounders for Sauce and Cowboys got two firsts for Parsons
This post was edited on 6/1/26 at 1:56 pm
Posted on 6/1/26 at 1:57 pm to imAMAZING
They did but the browns are getting Verse. A young, cheap, all pro caliber edge guy who should still be in his prime if the browns get their qb right.
I mean that won’t happen but that’s gotta be the thought process.
I mean that won’t happen but that’s gotta be the thought process.
Posted on 6/1/26 at 2:09 pm to Proximo
How can L.A. continue to trade for players like this?
Posted on 6/1/26 at 2:13 pm to stlslick
quote:
rams going All in
Which makes the Simpson pick even more weird. Why not draft someone who could help you win right now
Posted on 6/1/26 at 2:13 pm to imAMAZING
quote:
One would have to assume the rams picks will be near the end of each round barring a collapse so it’s a solid deal for them…I mean didn’t the jets get two first rounders for Sauce and Cowboys got two firsts for Parsons
Verse is probably worth a 1st and day 2 pick in a trade.
Posted on 6/1/26 at 2:20 pm to imAMAZING
quote:
Cowboys got two firsts for Parsons
But the Packers still had to pay him, the Browns are taking $40+ million cap hit not the Rams, for Garrett.
Posted on 6/1/26 at 5:34 pm to Proximo
Posted on 6/1/26 at 5:40 pm to PCRammer
quote:This is an understated angle
One could also say that if the Rams think they have their QB post-Stafford then that gives them the flexibility to move picks and not have to hold onto them for better draft position next year.
It’s also not like every first round rookie makes a huge impact right away. Getting the guy you think is your QB of the future isn’t mutually exclusive with being aggressive for a title run
And as much as I hate the fricks and their shite title, Snead/McVay are 1/1 going “all-in”
This post was edited on 6/1/26 at 5:44 pm
Posted on 6/1/26 at 5:40 pm to Proximo
A+ for the Browns. Not sure about the Rams
Posted on 6/1/26 at 8:04 pm to VA LSU fan
quote:
This is why the Simpson pick was so stupid.
Not really. Simpson needs to sit and learn as it is for at least a year if not two due to only having 15 starts in college and there are few better to learn from than Stafford.
quote:
Rams are all in on a two year window with Stafford
Agreed here. They are playing the short and long game(drafting Simpson).
Posted on 6/2/26 at 1:51 am to whatiknowsofar
quote:
This is a terrible trade for the rams imo. Verse is 25 with tons of upside and garrett just turned 30. On top that you gave away a first?
Garrett is way better than Verse and Garrett’s on a very cheap contract.
Rams are only obligated to pay Garrett:
2026- 8 mil
2027- 16 mil
2028- Garret can be cut with no dead money,
Rams werent gonna extend Verse anyway given other guys that need extensions plus Stafford/McDuffie making big cap numbers.
This trade is basically Verse/1st/2nd/3rd for 2 years of elite Myles Garrett production,
For a team like the Rams that has at best a 2 year window left with Stafford approaching 40 you build the best team you can for 26/27. After that McVay/Stafford probably gone anyway
Posted on 6/2/26 at 8:32 am to Marlboro Smooth
quote:
Browns are not tanking they just suck that bad
I think it is an amazing move for them. The guy is 30 and they’re a long way away.
This post was edited on 6/2/26 at 8:33 am
Posted on 6/2/26 at 8:35 am to JoeyP239
quote:
Rams are only obligated to pay Garrett:
2026- 8 mil
2027- 16 mil
2028- Garret can be cut with no dead money,
He has 5 years left and 98 million on it last time I checked
That would be wild work by the Browns in contract negotiations if your numbers are accurate
Popular
Back to top


1




