Started By
Message

re: Most Overrated Player In NBA History

Posted on 5/23/23 at 2:48 pm to
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111301 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

I didn't see that, but that is definitely on brand
You were in the thread arguing with him
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112845 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

If the indication is that the pre Durant Warriors were better than the Cavs of that time, and this is why I don’t take these arguments or the others in this thread seriously, they were not. LeBron was the best player and the Cavs were the better team built for playoff success with a 2-1 lead despite injuries to their 2 other offensive stars to start.
They were also better in 16 as the warriors were fools to chase a record (with an assistant sitting at the head spot).
This dude gives Kobe more credit for titles won with Shaq as the 2nd best player than he gives Lebron for a title over a 73 win team in which Lebron led BOTH teams in points/rebounds/assists/steals/blocks
This post was edited on 5/23/23 at 2:50 pm
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
70500 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 2:49 pm to
Let’s take you and slows comparative logic and apply it universally because it doesn’t strictly apply to basketball. Matt Stafford and Phillip Rivers are better QBs than John Elway and Joe Montana. That’s the same argument you’re making here.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112845 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

You were in the thread arguing with him
How long ago was this? Definitely not remotely recently, I haven't partaken in a Lebron thread like this one or last night's in a looooong time.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112845 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 2:51 pm to
quote:

Let’s take you and slows comparative logic and apply it universally because it doesn’t strictly apply to basketball. Matt Stafford and Phillip Rivers are better QBs than John Elway and Joe Montana. That’s the same argument you’re making here.

Wait, you think our argument is that every single player ever with less titles is always better than any single player ever with more titles?

Well then
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111301 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 2:51 pm to
I just laugh at them now. They are complete deranged losers no different than this woman right here



It’s classic they can’t see they are the other side of the coin
Posted by LSUFanMizeWay
Picayune MS
Member since Sep 2014
6665 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 2:52 pm to
Larry Bird
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
70500 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 2:52 pm to
I’d ask that you stop being dishonest about what I said but I know you can’t do that and continue your argument so…..
Posted by ThanosIsADemocrat
The Garden
Member since May 2018
9395 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

This dude gives Kobe more credit for titles won with Shaq as the 2nd best player than he gives Lebron for a title over a 73 win team in which Lebron led BOTH teams in points/rebounds/assists/steals/blocks


Talk about painting a false narrative.

The 15 Cavs healthy beat the brakes of the warriors. Even with 2/3 stars they took them to OT when Irving got hurt.

This post was edited on 5/23/23 at 2:54 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476328 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

They’re not elite alltime players though

What?

Cousy 39th

Havlicek is regarded as a top 100-150 historical by many.
Posted by BreakawayZou83
Kansas City, Missouri
Member since Oct 2011
10285 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

He also failed to win heads up against his piers. Specifically Curry, Durant, Dirk and Duncan not including the other times he failed to reach the mountaintop. He’s better historically than Durant, mostly because of Durant’s injuries. He’s better than Dirk. He’s inferior to Duncan as a basketball player. Curry is probably a coin flip but 3-1 is 3-1. Both of those guys are lesser than Russell and Russell and Duncan are very damn close.


Wait, your argument for why LeBron is worse than Duncan and maybe Curry is because he lost to them? Let's go through this absurdity.

LeBron lost to Duncan when he was 22 years old and led a Cavs team featuring Big Z and Drew Gooden all the way to the Finals. The Spurs literally threw everything at LeBron and ignored his teammates. The fact that he led that team to the Finals at that age is absurd. At the same age, Michael Jordan was playing NCAA basketball.

LeBron lost to Curry in 2015. You omit the fact that both Kyrie and Love were injured for that series. The Cavs' second leading scorer after LeBron was Mosgov. Seriously, look it up. LeBron nearly won the Finals MVP despite the series loss.

In 2014, LeBron lost to the Duncan Spurs but he averaged 28.2 PPG on 57.1% shooting, including 53% on threes! The Spurs team featured the Big Three Spurs plus Kawhi having emerged as a legitimate star.

In 2017 and 2018, LeBron lost to the most stacked team of all-time featuring prime Durant, Curry, Klay, and Green, plus a very deep bench. Across those two series, LeBron averaged 33.5 PPG, 9.25 RBG, 10 APG on 55% shooting. He was clearly the best player on the court, but he was outgunned. Especially in 2018 since Kyrie was gone.

It would be like saying Isaiah Thomas is better than MJ because MJ couldn't beat those Pistons teams in the late 80s. MJ was 10-12 against Detroit in the Playoffs despite the fact that MJ was the best player on the court.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476328 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

If the indication is that the pre Durant Warriors were better than the Cavs of that time, and this is why I don’t take these arguments or the others in this thread seriously, they were not

Oh the team that has the most regular season wins in NBA history wasn't better?

And you say you can't take us seriously?

Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
70500 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 2:54 pm to
Another double standard. You guys just move the goalpost and make contradictory statements in every post. No wonder your arguments are so poor.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
37512 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

But he will arguably go down less accomplished than he could have been especially in championships.


Saying "especially in championships" insinuates that he also is less accomplished as an individual, which is wild.



You are inferring things not implied.

If you like then read that statement as because of playoff losses because the heart of the criticism is the part of his career critics will be able to justly criticize.

It is unfair perhaps because other great players (not named Bill Russell) have a lot of black marks on their record too. The GOAT discussions are like this.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111301 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

MJ couldn't beat those Pistons teams in the late 80s. MJ was 10-12 against Detroit in the Playoffs despite the fact that MJ was the best player on the court.
Thats diffeRent!!!!
Posted by ThanosIsADemocrat
The Garden
Member since May 2018
9395 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

LeBron lost to Duncan when he was 22 years old and led a Cavs team featuring Big Z and Drew Gooden all the way to the Finals. The Spurs literally threw everything at LeBron and ignored his teammates. The fact that he led that team to the Finals at that age is absurd. At the same age, Michael Jordan was playing NCAA basketball.


He lost to Duncan again, and without Ray Allen a 3rd time.

Duncan is top 5 ever and yes over LeBron James.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476328 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

Let’s take you and slows comparative logic and apply it universally because it doesn’t strictly apply to basketball. Matt Stafford and Phillip Rivers are better QBs than John Elway and Joe Montana. That’s the same argument you’re making here.

Who made that argument?
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112845 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

I’d ask that you stop being dishonest about what I said but I know you can’t do that and continue your argument so…..

You literally made up an argument that makes on sense unless you think we're saying every player with less titles is better than every player with more titles.

Clarify your argument better because it makes zero sense as it stands.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112845 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

Talk about painting a false narrative.

You know what's a true narrative, you refusing to answer my Bill Russell question because it blows up everything you argued in this thread.


Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
26134 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 2:57 pm to
I think a compelling argument when looking at Kobe and Lebron is in the 2012 Olympics, Lebron deferred to the aging Bryant.
Jump to page
Page First 7 8 9 10 11 ... 22
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 22Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram