- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Little Leaguer Killed by Pitch
Posted on 6/5/11 at 2:12 pm to WHATDOINO
Posted on 6/5/11 at 2:12 pm to WHATDOINO
quote:
If this is your response, you aren't worth arguing with
Translation: I don't know what the hell I'm talking about.
I saw/played in the first 30 and the second 30. You are speaking from a position of extreme ignorance. Yet, somehow, you assert that I'm wrong because of other sports.
You stupidly don't even realize that you proved my point. Other sports have drastically reduced the number of US youths who choose baseball. Why would that make modern US baseball superior now vis-a-vis 60s?
Posted on 6/5/11 at 2:14 pm to SPEEDY
quote:
that is because you are watching little league games. To see the best players, you have to go watch travel teams
See my post on finances.
"A rich man's son will never play in the Major Leagues." Joe DiMaggio.
Posted on 6/5/11 at 2:19 pm to wahoocs
quote:
He should go to Frasch and watch some 12 year olds today. Any of five teams out there could handle most JV's, or at least give them all they want.
you got some shitty JV teams over there, then.
Posted on 6/5/11 at 2:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
that is such an american view and has not been proven in skill-based sports like soccer and baseball training means more than play
Yes, it has been proven. When baseball was introduced as an Olympic sport the USSR freaked out and hired a bunch of US minor league coaches to come and teach 14-18 y.o. Soviet athletes to play the game by the time they were 22. They couldn't do it. The Soviets and the U.S. coaches gave up the project as hopeless.
quote:
most latins are joining academies at very young ages
Ah, so that explains why so many Latins exploded into the Majors in the 80s? It was because they were in Academies in the 60s? Really?
Posted on 6/5/11 at 2:30 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
perception bias
and most LL players are shite. the good kids play on travel teams
Talent is diluted. I imagine travel or select teams are what your average Dixie or LL team looked like 40 years ago. My first Dixie Leage tryout there were over 50 kids trying out for 15 spots. Now, there are teams for every kid.
Posted on 6/5/11 at 2:48 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Now, there are teams for every kid.
Yea but only the good ones get on the best travel/select teams.
I am not saying "your" time didn't have the best LL's, because honestly I don't give a shite. But your logic is flawed here.
Posted on 6/5/11 at 3:05 pm to lighter345
quote:
Yea but only the good ones get on the best travel/select teams.
Exactly what I stated above. Reading comp. Learn it.
quote:
I am not saying "your" time didn't have the best LL's, because honestly I don't give a shite. But your logic is flawed here.
This was never stated. Again, you don't possess the ability to understand what you read. Select teams are similar to LL or Dixie teams of decades ago.
This post was edited on 6/5/11 at 3:07 pm
Posted on 6/5/11 at 3:30 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Talent is diluted. I imagine travel or select teams are what your average Dixie or LL team looked like 40 years ago[/quote]
You are saying the travel teams only compare to an average LL team. I am saying that is wrong.
[quote]This was never stated.
You just said 40 years ago. By saying the talent is diluted today, then you are claiming the talent wasn't back then.
Posted on 6/5/11 at 4:37 pm to lighter345
In all honesty kids playing on a little league field shouldn't be bunting just as pitcher shouldn't throw curve balls. If you're playing on a little league diamond it should be about basic fundamentals. A kid shouldn't be allowed to bunt until he's mastered basic hitting.
Save bunting for high school and american legion ball.
Save bunting for high school and american legion ball.
Posted on 6/5/11 at 4:42 pm to Ralph_Wiggum
learning to bunt is part of learning the fundamentals, no?
fwiw we learned to bunt at 8 years old against live pitching.
obviously it wasnt something we mastered at that age, but it wasnt that hard to do
fwiw we learned to bunt at 8 years old against live pitching.
obviously it wasnt something we mastered at that age, but it wasnt that hard to do
Posted on 6/5/11 at 4:45 pm to Ralph_Wiggum
quote:
Save bunting for high school and american legion ball.
True. We should also ban swinging the bat. A LL batter should yell "I wish the ball to go 3B". The 3B should yell "I wish the batter to be out." If he's too slow on the call the batter is safe.
Posted on 6/5/11 at 4:47 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
learning to bunt is part of learning the fundamentals, no?
fwiw we learned to bunt at 8 years old against live pitching.
obviously it wasnt something we mastered at that age, but it wasnt that hard to do
Eight year olds bunting? That's just a waste of time. I mean do you really think it' a good idea to teach 8 year olds how to bunt? Your coach was pretty stupid for wasting time on teaching 8 year olds how to bunt.
Bunting does nothing for teaching kids how to hit live pitching. A lot of 8 year olds still have problems making contact and not bailing out of the batter's box.
I knew a guy who played high school ball against Ken Griffey Jr in Cincinnatti. No scout gave a shite about bunting even in high school ball.
Posted on 6/5/11 at 4:49 pm to Zach
quote:
True. We should also ban swinging the bat. A LL batter should yell "I wish the ball to go 3B". The 3B should yell "I wish the batter to be out." If he's too slow on the call the batter is safe.
Ha-ha. Kids should be taught how to properly swing a bat and make contact consistently. Bunting is a waste of time for kids. Tell the coach he's not a neighborhood Jim Leyland. No one gives a frick about bunting at that level of ball.
Posted on 6/5/11 at 5:04 pm to Ralph_Wiggum
quote:
Ha-ha. Kids should be taught how to properly swing a bat and make contact consistently. Bunting is a waste of time for kids. Tell the coach he's not a neighborhood Jim Leyland. No one gives a frick about bunting at that level of ball.
First, 8 yo did not play LL back in the day. We played lot ball from 7 yo to 8 yo with no adults around. Every day. All day. We went to LL at age 9 or 10.
By then we were so skilled we did not have to learn how to bunt. We just needed to know how far you wanted us to roll the ball.
By age 11 we didn't shag balls in batting practice in front. We caught them at opposite hip by moving our arm behind our backs.
By 12 when playing IF in batting practice you fielded a grounder on your knees and threw a laser to first just to show off.
By 13 most OF could do the behind the back catch in practice. You caught the ball by letting it fall past your head into your glove which was placed just above your butt.
Of course, we didn't do this stuff in real games. Except for one. If you were an IF and got a sharp grounder you took 1, 2, 3, 4 crow hops waiting for the batter to get closer to first base. And then fired the ball to get him by a step. That was my specialty. It was great fun.
This post was edited on 6/5/11 at 5:06 pm
Posted on 6/5/11 at 5:07 pm to Ralph_Wiggum
quote:
I mean do you really think it' a good idea to teach 8 year olds how to bunt?
why is it a bad idea?
quote:
I knew a guy who played high school ball against Ken Griffey Jr in Cincinnatti. No scout gave a shite about bunting even in high school ball.
ok Mr Name Drop
you dont develop bunting skills to impress scouts in the first place
Posted on 6/5/11 at 6:14 pm to lsu480
quote:
I am around kids baseball more than anyone on this site. I know that it was the coaches fault.
here we go ..
Posted on 6/5/11 at 6:34 pm to Zach
quote:
Of course, we didn't do this stuff in real games. Except for one. If you were an IF and got a sharp grounder you took 1, 2, 3, 4 crow hops waiting for the batter to get closer to first base. And then fired the ball to get him by a step. That was my specialty. It was great fun.
Well we do have something in common. When I was a kid we used to play on the lots all the time as well. We also had little league beginning for 7 year olds coached by dads.
We used to play both and play 500 in the outfield and play with ghosties and play with pitcher's hand and stuff like that when we didn't have enough kids.
It is sad that you don't see kids playing baseball by themselves on the playgrounds all day without adults.
Posted on 6/5/11 at 7:29 pm to Zach
quote:
Ah, so that explains why so many Latins exploded into the Majors in the 80s? It was because they were in Academies in the 60s? Really?
that was timing due to interest
just like how we realy didn't see a ton of euros hit the NBA until the kids who were youths at the time of the 92 games grew up
now i don't know why there was an explosion of interest, but that's all you're talking about
if academies/training wasn't beneficial, then why does the MLB rely on them so much now?
quote:
When baseball was introduced as an Olympic sport the USSR freaked out and hired a bunch of US minor league coaches to come and teach 14-18 y.o. Soviet athletes to play the game by the time they were 22. They couldn't do it. The Soviets and the U.S. coaches gave up the project as hopeless.
but it's taken in japan and latin america, so i don't see how this one example invalidates anything
Posted on 6/5/11 at 7:32 pm to Ralph_Wiggum
quote:
It is sad that you don't see kids playing baseball by themselves on the playgrounds all day without adults.
luckily you see them playing superior sports like soccer and basketball more often
Posted on 6/5/11 at 7:51 pm to Zach
quote:
I can't prove it, but it seems to me that more freakish accidental deaths in LL have occurred in the last 30 years than in the previous 30. I'm not sure why.
availability of information
You wouldn't have heard of this 30 years ago.
and your points have been laughable throughout this entire thread
Popular
Back to top



0





