Started By
Message

re: Kirk Cousins: Where Does He End Up?

Posted on 12/27/17 at 10:52 am to
Posted by offshoretrash
Farmerville, La
Member since Aug 2008
10706 posts
Posted on 12/27/17 at 10:52 am to
quote:

It's not as simple as that. If they let him go because he wants and some other team will give him $30mil/year for 5 years, Washington made the right decision.


I just don't see that happening, there simply is not that kind of market out there. He will ask and get around $22mil a year which is a fair market value for him. The Redskins started this mess from the start. If they had offered him a 5 year 20mil deal he would have taken it. Instead they have paid him $77m for 3 years and inflated his value.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112568 posts
Posted on 12/27/17 at 10:56 am to
quote:

I just don't see that happening, there simply is not that kind of market out there. He will ask and get around $22mil a year which is a fair market value for him. The Redskins started this mess from the start. If they had offered him a 5 year 20mil deal he would have taken it. Instead they have paid him $77m for 3 years and inflated his value.

Stafford got an AAV of $27mil with $92mil guaranteed if I recall.

Somebody will screw up and give Cousins something similar IMO.
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
11104 posts
Posted on 12/27/17 at 11:03 am to
Hindsight is fun, so you would have given Cousins a 100M contract off one season where they finished 9-7 and got blown out in a playoff game they were favored to win?
Posted by brgfather129
Los Angeles, CA
Member since Jul 2009
17358 posts
Posted on 12/27/17 at 11:14 am to
quote:

it's not going to magically get better.


No one is expecting "magic".

What I expect under Bob Quinn is the capability to put together a competitive roster from top-to-bottom, which was never the case under Martin Mayhew. It's your choice to continue to be ignorant of the actual numbers and the Lions cap situation going forward.

Understand the numbers, then post.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112568 posts
Posted on 12/27/17 at 11:16 am to
lol ok.

Sure thing.
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
31823 posts
Posted on 12/27/17 at 11:24 am to
quote:

Hindsight is fun, so you would have given Cousins a 100M contract off one season where they finished 9-7 and got blown out in a playoff game they were favored to win?



5yr/100mil with the 40mil guaranteed right? Isn't that what the original numbers were?

If memory serves me correctly than yes you would. You gave him 20mil of it alone in the first year (first tag). If he played well, do you honestly think he signs another cheap deal? No, well then it becomes a 2yr/44mil (2nd tag) and you're already in a larger hole than giving him the 40mil guarantee. Now its worse because you have less leverage if he were to continue to play well and you don't technically have him past 2 years either.

If he played poorly on a tag, you could let him walk and not risk another 20mil. If he played poorly on the 5yr contract you risk in total about 40mil.

Hindsight is a stupid, but the redskins were not in a win-win or lose-lose situation, it would have been a calculated risk that any team would have taken and they idiotically risked a long term deal for a potential franchise QB. They made themselves lose-lose by cornering themselves instead of taking a risk.
This post was edited on 12/27/17 at 11:25 am
Posted by Crowknowsbest
Member since May 2012
26751 posts
Posted on 12/27/17 at 11:37 am to
quote:

This is what I don't get about the crowd arguing for WAS to pay him.

They say the team around him isn't good enough. But then they want WAS to give him more money, thus making the team around him even worse.

In what world does that work out with sustained success, especially in the postseason?

It's maddening. A complete failure to understand the concept of allocating finite resources.

shite, the more I see guys like Cousins, Wilson, Prescott, etc. having success, I actually start to wonder about a strategy of churning through mid-round senior QBs on rookie deals and maintaining a roster around that position that is loaded to the teeth. If you find a Tom Brady, you can adjust.
Posted by SeeeeK
some where
Member since Sep 2012
30453 posts
Posted on 12/27/17 at 11:47 am to
Not sure, but there are some QB's in free agency that can help you win, and with solid defense, get to playoffs.

Have we had this many qb's who can actually help ur team in free agency pool???
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
11104 posts
Posted on 12/27/17 at 12:54 pm to
No, Cousins wanted 5y/100M with about 70 guaranteed. The Skins offered 4y/70M with about 40 guaranteed. The 1st franchise tag was 18M. You can't keeping adding the costs each offseason. If he got the big contract, he would have made 40ish the first two seasons, instead he's made 42. So not a huge difference..
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
31823 posts
Posted on 12/27/17 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

, he would have made 40ish the first two seasons, instead he's made 42. So not a huge difference..



The issue is, one option gives you the leverage and choice for the following 2-3 years at a reasonable cost. The other option gives you no leverage for a low cost if he were to play well.

The initial 2 year cost would have been the same. The years 3 and so on would not be. they risked it and lost, in doing so they won games they shouldn't have and now they're not in position to get one of the qbs
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112568 posts
Posted on 12/27/17 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

The issue is, one option gives you the leverage and choice for the following 2-3 years at a reasonable cost. The other option gives you no leverage for a low cost if he were to play well.

The initial 2 year cost would have been the same. The years 3 and so on would not be. they risked it and lost, in doing so they won games they shouldn't have and now they're not in position to get one of the qbs

I think he's correct on the hindsight thing though. That was based off of 1 Cousins season, correct?

We see that flash in the pan type season a decent amount, and had that gone the other route and Cousins had been a subpar QB, that's $70mil guaranteed over 5 years.

Knowing what you know now, sure they missed out...but it definitely would have been risky IMO and in the moment had potential to really backfire.
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
126562 posts
Posted on 12/27/17 at 2:16 pm to
quote:

in doing so they won games they shouldn't have and now they're not in position to get one of the qbs


Lol

One playoff appearance as the full time starter
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
76373 posts
Posted on 12/27/17 at 2:23 pm to
quote:


shite, the more I see guys like Cousins, Wilson, Prescott, etc. having success, I actually start to wonder about a strategy of churning through mid-round senior QBs on rookie deals and maintaining a roster around that position that is loaded to the teeth. If you find a Tom Brady, you can adjust.




For every Wilson, there's a billion Ryan Malletts.
Posted by Remulan
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2014
925 posts
Posted on 12/27/17 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

The Redskins are loaded with talent...an all pro tight end


Who is this? The guy who is 45 or the guy who plays about 1.5 games a year avg?
Posted by Minden tiger
Minden,Louisiana
Member since Apr 2006
3304 posts
Posted on 12/27/17 at 6:00 pm to
Redskins fans don’t appreciate Kirk, but if he leaves they will.
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
126562 posts
Posted on 12/31/17 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

Redskins fans don’t appreciate Kirk, but if he leaves they will.




Yea today’s performance was awesome

Under 200 yards and 3 interceptions

The third being in crunch time during the potential game tying drive

Yet again coming up small when it matters this time against the terrible Giants led by Eli.

For us Skins fans who watch him week and week out we see what goes on, everyone else just sees the padded stat line.
This post was edited on 12/31/17 at 2:56 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
463719 posts
Posted on 12/31/17 at 2:55 pm to
who are you gong to get who is comparable?
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
126562 posts
Posted on 12/31/17 at 2:57 pm to
For the money he wants.....

He is a tier 2 guy demanding elite tier 1 money

Games like this are exactly why you have to be reluctant about paying him richest QB in the NFL money.
Posted by Elleshoe
Wade’s World
Member since Jun 2004
143780 posts
Posted on 12/31/17 at 2:58 pm to
I don’t disagree with either side. Cousins isn’t a guy that’s going to win a bunch of playoff games for you IMO but he’s not bad enough that you can let him walk
Posted by rilesrick
Member since Mar 2015
6704 posts
Posted on 12/31/17 at 3:45 pm to
East coast Gmen or West Coast Cards. Good to have options
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram