Started By
Message

re: Is Trout the next Babe Ruth?

Posted on 3/5/20 at 2:38 pm to
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145164 posts
Posted on 3/5/20 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

Why do people feel the need to make shite up like no one is going to call then out
should be the MSBs crest
Posted by VerlanderBEAST
Member since Dec 2011
18984 posts
Posted on 3/5/20 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

Trout: .305/.419/.581 (1.000), 176 OPS+, 200/236 SBs, 72.5 WAR
A-Rod: .308/.382/.581 (.963), 144 OPS+, 177/223 SBs, 63.6 WAR
Bonds: .275/.380/.503 (.883), 147 OPS+, 251/323 SBs, 50.3 WAR
Cobb: .368/.423/.515 (.938), 182 OPS+, 488/unk SB, 69.0 WAR
Mantle: .311/.425/.569 (.994), 173 OPS+, 98/123 SB, 68.1 WAR
Ruth: .337/.462/.696 (1.157), 213 OPS+, 46/unk SB, 50.3 WAR(b) + 20.1 WAR(p) = 70.4 total WAR



Yes none of them were in their prime at 20 like Trout. But they were all in their prime by 27

Most people would agree the top 8 post integration are IN NO ORDER are:
A-Rod
Schmidt
Mantle
Mays
Pujols
Williams
Henderson
Bonds

And obviously Bonds is the only 1 who got waaaaaay better after 27 which is why he's the GOAT

If you want to argue Trout's average prime season falls in line with theirs ok make that argument but it certainly doesnt exceed theirs

Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64662 posts
Posted on 3/5/20 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

A-Rod
Schmidt
Mantle
Mays
Pujols
Williams
Henderson
Bonds

Most people wouldn't agree with a couple of those names. Miek Schmidt. great player, but top 8 post-integration, ehhhhhhh probably not. Same with Ricky Henderson, I don't think many people at all would have him on there. Other than stealing bases, what did Henderson do that was spectacular compared to his peers? I also wouldn't personally put Pujols there but can see why some would.
Posted by Speedy G
Member since Aug 2013
3901 posts
Posted on 3/5/20 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

Yes none of them were in their prime at 20 like Trout. But they were all in their prime by 27

If you want to argue Trout's average prime season falls in line with theirs ok make that argument but it certainly doesnt exceed theirs


They all reached their prime well before 27, except Bonds, who played three years of college ball, and (arguably) Ruth, who was a pitcher until his mid 20s. A-Rod's OPS+ at 20 was 161. Mantle's 162. Cobb's 167. Trout's 168.

To be honest, I don't know what you are trying to say, except that we may not even have seen Mike Trout's best years yet.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110866 posts
Posted on 3/5/20 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

If you want to argue Trout's average prime season falls in line with theirs ok make that argument but it certainly doesnt exceed theirs

OPS+ and WAR says otherwise, no?
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145164 posts
Posted on 3/5/20 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

If you want to argue Trout's average prime season falls in line with theirs ok make that argument but it certainly doesnt exceed theirs
trouts WAR7 exceeds a good number of that group
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145164 posts
Posted on 3/5/20 at 3:57 pm to
Should also be stressed that those WAR7s are propped up by having more seasons to chose from, and I would love to see how trouts per game WAR matches up to the few ahead of him considering how he has bad multiple seasons cut short by injury affecting his WAR totals
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66551 posts
Posted on 3/5/20 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

Batters are going for the 3 true outcomes in their at bats at the highest rate all time in the game and he is the poster child for that,


That’s not true at all. Dude hits for average as well. Career .300 hitter. He does strike out but he’s not just homers , walks and strikeouts.
Posted by The Seaward
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2006
11348 posts
Posted on 3/5/20 at 5:05 pm to
Yeah, I’d say Joey Gallo is clearly the three true outcome poster boy.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66551 posts
Posted on 3/5/20 at 5:56 pm to
Gallo is the ultimate 2 possible outcomes guy
This post was edited on 3/5/20 at 5:57 pm
Posted by Jester
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
34311 posts
Posted on 3/5/20 at 6:01 pm to
quote:

Remember around 2009 when Albert Pujols was the best player on the planet and people said he was going to be the greatest of all time? I remember that.




Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278413 posts
Posted on 3/5/20 at 6:01 pm to
quote:

Too many stat nerd Mike Greenberg types in baseball journalism these days.



There are stat nerds, then there are guys who recite buzz words like “3 outcome player” yet don’t know what they mean (you) lol
This post was edited on 3/5/20 at 6:05 pm
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278413 posts
Posted on 3/5/20 at 6:35 pm to
quote:

Same with Ricky Henderson, I don't think many people at all would have him on there. Other than stealing bases, what did Henderson do that was spectacular compared to his peers?


He’s 14th all time in bWAR by position players.

And like 3rd of 4th In the last 50 years In WAR


Leads MLB history in 3 major categories: Runs, SB, BB. Henderson severely impacted the game like few other players have.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64662 posts
Posted on 3/5/20 at 6:39 pm to
quote:

Leads MLB history in 3 major categories: Runs, SB, BB. Henderson severely impacted the game like few other players have.

That’s all well and good but he’s still not a top 8 player the past 80 years. He played 25 seasons, so his volume stats aren’t really going to be as persuasive as you’d like them to be. He also doesn’t lead in walks. He’s about 400 behind with Bonds having played 3 more seasons. And none of this really refuted what I said about him. Great player? Yes. Hall of fame player? Yes. Top 8 the past 80 years? No
This post was edited on 3/5/20 at 6:50 pm
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278413 posts
Posted on 3/5/20 at 6:55 pm to
quote:

He played 25 seasons



and has a career OBP of .400

That is insane


And yea i forgot about Bonds. RIckey retired in the lead i think.



He's not really a compiler. Go pull up his b-ref page and look at how many times he led the league in a category or finished in the top 3-5.

He led the league in SB and BBs at 39.

he had an .889 OPS at age 40 lol.

He played at a high level for a long time. If he isnt a top 8, he's right there in the top 12 or so.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64662 posts
Posted on 3/5/20 at 6:57 pm to
quote:

If he isnt a top 8, he's right there in the top 12 or so.

At his position sure
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278413 posts
Posted on 3/5/20 at 7:00 pm to
Yea, You should definitely do some googling. Clueless
Posted by Mr Perfect
Member since Mar 2010
17836 posts
Posted on 3/5/20 at 7:01 pm to
still hoping for bron and ad injuries dude lol
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64662 posts
Posted on 3/5/20 at 7:03 pm to
Yeah, no I don’t really need to. His on base % is 53rd all time. I said he was the best base runner, which is reflected in his runs and stolen bases. Look dude, me saying he’s not a top 8 player (he isn’t) doesn’t mean I’m saying he wasn’t elite. But maybe step out of your little bubble and let something other than a computer tell you who’s good and who’s not. Just a thought. But we all know you don’t think you’ve ever been wrong about anything so I probably shouldn’t waste my time with you
This post was edited on 3/5/20 at 7:05 pm
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278413 posts
Posted on 3/5/20 at 7:10 pm to
I dont need my computer to tell me what he was


but im not going to sit here and just say "he is or isnt something" and leave it at that without any facts to support my claim like you are doing right now.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram