Started By
Message

re: Is Nebraska Football still a blue blood?

Posted on 6/25/24 at 10:28 am to
Posted by The Scofflaw
Metairie, LA
Member since Sep 2014
1920 posts
Posted on 6/25/24 at 10:28 am to
The only reason I single out NEB is because one of the hallmark of a blueblood is that they can bounce back with relative quick ease after downturns and they haven't been able to do this.

Hell look at MI and this board the past few years. You had tons of mouth breathers say "MI LOL they're no longer a Blue Blood" and then they went and won the championship.
This post was edited on 6/25/24 at 10:29 am
Posted by WaterLink
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2015
20604 posts
Posted on 6/25/24 at 10:43 am to
"weeks ranked" and "weeks ranked #1" is a terrible metric. Only final polls should be counted.

Just as an example, 2012 USC was preseason #1, they went 7-6 and didn't even finish ranked, hell they didn't even finish with a single vote so they didn't even appear in the "others receiving votes" category in the final AP poll. But using "weeks ranked #1" and "weeks ranked" as a metric, this season counts a week ranked #1 and 12 weeks ranked towards USC's total.

This was a few years ago and I don't want to go through all of my posts to find it, but I remember someone posted this graphic before and I pointed this out back then, and on a day with a lot of time on my hands I went to the AP poll archive and substituted the data to only include final polls and not go by the number of weeks and the other 7 on this list still stayed towards the top, but Nebraska fell hard to the rest of the pack and were around where LSU and Auburn are.
Posted by Prominentwon
LSU, McNeese St. Fan
Member since Jan 2005
94825 posts
Posted on 6/25/24 at 11:15 am to
Nebraska COULD be. They have the support and the money to do so. Thats why I’m so interested in how Ruhle ends up doing there.
Posted by GentleJackJones
Member since Mar 2019
4949 posts
Posted on 6/25/24 at 11:16 am to
If Notre Dame is a blue blood, then Nebraska is a blue blood. That's the way I look at it.
Posted by ChestRockwell
In the heart of horse country
Member since Jul 2021
7103 posts
Posted on 6/25/24 at 11:33 am to
Texas is not a blue blood. They've gotten way too much credit for beating cupcakes in the SWC for many years. There were plenty bad teams in that conference.
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
Member since May 2012
59209 posts
Posted on 6/25/24 at 11:38 am to
quote:

Everytime the top college football programmes are mentioned in Podcasts, LSU is mentioned in the top 4 or 5. That's good enough for me.

LSU is like a Zuckerberg or Musk

Nebraska is like the Vanderbilts
Posted by Globetrotter747
Member since Sep 2017
5340 posts
Posted on 6/25/24 at 11:45 am to
Anyone who doesn't consider Texas a blue blood is a dumbass.
Posted by AUFANATL
Member since Dec 2007
5095 posts
Posted on 6/25/24 at 11:56 am to

Nebraska's achilles heel as a blue blood has always been a poor wellspring of local talent. They can grab a few cornfed linemen from within a 200 mile radius of their campus but for the most part they have to recruit nationally to put a top 20 roster together. A team like UGA, Miami, USC or LSU can instantly put themselves back into the championship discussion simply by corralling the local horses for a few years. Nebraska can't do that and they don't have the type of pull that a ND or Michigan has - not anymore at least.

I wouldn't revoke their Blue Blood card just yet though. They have had some success and haven't fallen off the map. But they are trending in the wrong direction.
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
38783 posts
Posted on 6/25/24 at 11:57 am to
I think your Blue Bloods are settled.

Now the race is on for who has the best “new money“.
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
57055 posts
Posted on 6/25/24 at 11:58 am to
nebraska is no longer a blue blood and shows no signs of returning to the ranks.

As for LSU, much as I hate to say it, we are not blue bloods - yet. But we are getting there. We've had success since Saban landed in Baton Rouge but we've had too many down years in those times to be blue blood. We also haven't been too consistent in showing up in New Years Day bowl games. What we do is have a great year and then two or three years of mediocrity (don't give me crap about records, look at those SEC records). Not blue blood.
This post was edited on 6/25/24 at 12:02 pm
Posted by Falco
Member since Dec 2018
2219 posts
Posted on 6/25/24 at 12:03 pm to
No...



Alabama
Ohio State
OU
USC
Michigan
Texas
Posted by ronricks
Member since Mar 2021
11098 posts
Posted on 6/25/24 at 12:13 pm to
No.
Posted by BHTiger
Charleston
Member since Dec 2017
8480 posts
Posted on 6/25/24 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

2016 Music City Bowl loss to Tennessee was the last time Nebraska was in a bowl game


As someone who watched them in the 70s to 90s that is a. Incredible fact.
Posted by ronricks
Member since Mar 2021
11098 posts
Posted on 6/25/24 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

USC has the argument of past success but their last 15 years have been dreadful


Might as well remove ND as well then. ND's last national championship was 36 years ago.
Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
44251 posts
Posted on 6/25/24 at 12:25 pm to
8 years ago ESPN listed their bluebloods

since then Nebraska hasn't been to a bowl game, while LSU added a national title and 2 Heisman winners.


quote:

8. Nebraska Cornhuskers | 9.5

Relatively speaking, Nebraska has enjoyed more recent success. The first of the Cornhuskers five national championships came in 1970. They went back to back in 1970-71 and again in 1994-95. They've also produced three Heisman winners including 2001's winner, quarterback Eric Crouch.


quote:

9. LSU Tigers | 9.33

LSU is often a part of the national title conversation, but the Tigers have won only three, the most recent of which came from current coach Les Miles in 2007. They've also produced only one Heisman Trophy winner, Billy Cannon in 1959.
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
53818 posts
Posted on 6/25/24 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

Might as well remove ND as well then. ND's last national championship was 36 years ago.


ND is still somewhat competitive though
Posted by ronricks
Member since Mar 2021
11098 posts
Posted on 6/25/24 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

ND is still somewhat competitive though


At some point you have to win something. 36 years is a long time especially for a 'blue blood'.
Posted by Dairy Sanders
Member since Apr 2022
2963 posts
Posted on 6/25/24 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

Texas is not a blue blood. They've gotten way too much credit for beating cupcakes in the SWC for many years. There were plenty bad teams in that conference.


Do we really want to go down that road because you’d be shocked by the number of wins that some programs have pre WW2 against no name programs, many of which no longer exist and haven’t for decades.
Posted by oldtrucker
Marianna, Fl
Member since Apr 2013
3123 posts
Posted on 6/25/24 at 1:13 pm to
At one time Nebraska was a blue blood. That was before the transfusion.
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
39042 posts
Posted on 6/25/24 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

Michigan
Bama
Ohio St
ND
Texas
Oklahoma

all have winning % above .700. pretty remarkable

.

And USC sits at (.695) with the most Heisman Trophy winners and NFL HOFers.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram