Started By
Message

re: Is Jacob deGrom a lock for the hall of fame?

Posted on 8/5/25 at 12:36 pm to
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
45677 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 12:36 pm to
How long will it take him to get to 2,000 innings, though?
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
35661 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

He pitched more than Billy Wagner. If relievers are let in, you can justify starters with short but dominant careers.


This is some dumb shite right here
Posted by ShaneTheLegLechler
Member since Dec 2011
62959 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 12:40 pm to
Why?
Posted by NukemVol
Member since Jan 2010
1693 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 12:40 pm to
Three outs are three outs. And you have to do it over multiple turns through the lineup. If anything the gap in worth between relievers and starters isn’t seen as big enough.
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
35661 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

Three outs are three outs.


There’s data boys that actually believe this

quote:

If anything the gap in worth between relievers and starters isn’t seen as big enough.


I don’t disagree with this
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
287645 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

His numbers aren’t “deceiving” like you tried to say. His numbers are his numbers. When he plays, he’s awesome, but he doesn’t play. That’s extraordinarily clear


He is about to pass Koufax in WAR, widely regarded as the best LHP ever, despite pitching 800 less innings (equates to 4 full modern seasons worth of pitching).

I’m assuming you understand how WAR is accumulated, huh ?
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
35661 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

I’m assuming you understand how WAR is accumulated, huh ?


Yes, but I also think the nerds put too much stock in it
Posted by The Seaward
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2006
11510 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 12:45 pm to
I would lean yes, since he was so clearly the best pitcher in baseball at this peak. At his best, I think he was arguably the most unhittable pitcher in MLB history.

That said, I get the arguments about durability and missed time and wouldn’t argue too hard against that side
This post was edited on 8/5/25 at 4:02 pm
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
53373 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 1:36 pm to
quote:

If relievers are let in, you can justify starters with short but dominant careers.
theyre different roles… we’re not pretending the first three outs and the last three outs are the same
Posted by NukemVol
Member since Jan 2010
1693 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 2:19 pm to
The difference in those outs is less than what starters have to manage. Going through a lineup three times is harder. Not being setup based on lefty/righty matchups is harder. Sitting through long innings is harder. I don’t see any reason to give closers some bump because they get cool walkout music and some fans yelling.
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
287645 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 2:34 pm to
quote:

Yes, but I also think the nerds put too much stock in it


It’s used in some capacity to negotiate contracts & for HOF voting, amongst other things. It’s well past the stage of just being a nerd stat
Posted by BugaNation86
Member since Jul 2025
411 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 9:51 pm to
quote:

Fastest to 1,800 strikeouts in MLB history.



Skeens will pass him up in no time
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
35661 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 9:53 pm to
quote:

It’s used in some capacity to negotiate contracts & for HOF voting, amongst other things. It’s well past the stage of just being a nerd stat


I understand, way too much so

You are smart for understanding WAR
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
53373 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 12:25 am to
quote:

It’s well past the stage of just being a nerd stat


Only nerds can explain how a player accumulates WAR though
Posted by RemouladeSawce
Uranus
Member since Sep 2008
16599 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 2:42 am to
quote:

Which is not very often… the entire point
It’s not the Hall of Available

Let It Go
Posted by Paul Allen
Montauk, NY
Member since Nov 2007
77647 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 9:58 am to
Too many people on this thread are factoring in his injuries.
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
35661 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 10:03 am to
quote:

It’s not the Hall of Available


It actually is. Being available, typically for a long time is the most fundamental of the criteria
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram