Started By
Message

re: How Donaghy fixed NBA games

Posted on 2/19/19 at 3:39 pm to
Posted by CivilTiger83
Member since Dec 2017
2525 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

A big one, especially in basketball.


I agree that refs are capable of influencing the games and it can change the outcome, especially in basketball. Foul calls are such a judgement call and called so frequently, that it is easy to hide the influence of the ref. Refs can do the same thing with holding and pass interference calls in the NFL, but I think it is more difficult to hide if you are blatant about it.

It was a long time ago, but I still remember some terrible calls when the Kings played the Lakers in the early 2000s. The Kings were a hot team that looked like they were going to pull off an upset, but a couple of terrible calls and it all turned around in the Western Conference Finals.
Posted by GeauxAggie972
Poterbin Residence
Member since Aug 2009
29424 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 4:04 pm to
quote:

No this comes from me saying a call in the third quarter doesn’t determine the outcome of the game


And you're wrong there too.

Rockets up by 6 in the third and "Donaghy" makes a phantom call on HardLn to give him a fifth foul.

You're trying to tell me that wouldn't affect the outcome?
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59684 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 4:10 pm to
It would yes but not more than the players. The players themselves always have more of an impact on the results than the refs. saying we only lost bc of the refs is the issue. I never said calls don’t have an impact, they just pale on comparison to the actual players impact on the results. That’s why we don’t go there.
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32304 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 4:12 pm to
What ever happened to Jack Concannon? I can't imagine he was very happy when Donaghy told him that he could no longer place bets with him.
Posted by TulaneFan
Slidell, LA
Member since Jan 2008
14030 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 4:13 pm to
I see how your argument could hold water in most cases, make a few more plays and a couple of bad calls wouldn’t matter...

But this thread is about a guy who was convicted and served time in prison for fixing the outcome of games.
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59684 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 4:13 pm to
Some say this screw job was worse than that Sacramento one. But do we blame the refs? Nah not once, I’m not that kinda guy. GSW was just better that day.

LINK

Posted by littleavery1948
Member since Oct 2014
2537 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 4:41 pm to
quote:

I never said disadvantage numb skull.

I said the refs are never the only reason a team lost. You can never blame a game entirely on the refs.


Boom gonna die a thousand deaths on this hill
This post was edited on 2/19/19 at 4:42 pm
Posted by BigBrod81
Houma
Member since Sep 2010
18955 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

It would yes but not more than the players. The players themselves always have more of an impact on the results than the refs. saying we only lost bc of the refs is the issue. I never said calls don’t have an impact, they just pale on comparison to the actual players impact on the results. That’s why we don’t go there.





Posted by BigBrod81
Houma
Member since Sep 2010
18955 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

I’m not that kinda guy. 


Something about dinner & yadda, yadda, yadda.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83334 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 4:51 pm to
I can't see ANY of the pictures or gifs you're posting
Posted by BigBrod81
Houma
Member since Sep 2010
18955 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 5:01 pm to
It's showing for me.
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32304 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 5:07 pm to
quote:

I can't see ANY of the pictures or gifs you're posting

Works for me.
Posted by JETigER
LSU 2011 National Champions
Member since Dec 2003
7081 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 5:10 pm to
no one put a gun to football players to play and no one put a gun to my head to watch.

why can't I sue for the NFC championship game causing my heart to enlarge though high blood pressure and shortening my lifespan and weakening my sex life.

Just like its stupid for me to sue for that, it is stupid that the players were able to sue for CTE
This post was edited on 2/19/19 at 5:11 pm
Posted by BigBrod81
Houma
Member since Sep 2010
18955 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 5:16 pm to
quote:

What’s worse blaming refs or blaming a strip club trip that’s called a concussion?



quote:

I vacation probably monthly. Sometimes 2x a month. Not ashamed to say I got it better than you bro. When I’m on vacation no I don’t watch hoop. I ain’t see but maybe 5 CC games this year. So you gotta go somewhere else for analysis if you want it.


LINK
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59684 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 5:22 pm to
Now I am looking at the article and it saying the guy won 60-70% of his bets when donaghy reffed. So that’s even worse. And backs B up even more that even when a ref is deliberately picking a side his impact is minimal compared to the players.
Posted by Double Oh
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2008
17697 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 5:33 pm to
Its a wonder that this guy is still alive and no one has whacked him yet.
Posted by BigBrod81
Houma
Member since Sep 2010
18955 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 5:42 pm to
quote:

Donaghy zigzagging across the country, in and out of NBA arenas, making his picks to Martino over those cheap bodega burner phones, but not always, because sometimes they'd forget and use their own regular phones, because who cared? -- wins and wins and wins and wins, his picks almost 100 percent wins. 



quote:

Money now pouring into games Donaghy is refereeing, the lines during trading sessions swinging violently, like stocks beset by takeover rumors-widening and narrowing by 1.5, 3, 4.5, even 5 points, unheard of in the NBA except in the case of significant player injuries 


quote:

Donaghy on March 14 in Indianapolis calling four straight fouls in the fourth against the underdog Pacers when they were losing by six to the visiting Wizards. Favored by 6, the visiting Wizards covering


quote:

Donaghy said that he'd often pick on the big center or most valuable player of each team, per one gambler who once confronted the ref. The gambler added, "He also told me they were betting millions and he was an idiot not to ask for more." 


quote:

"By six points either way. That's what he told me.

"Tommy Martino on how much Donaghy said he could influence an NBA game


quote:

Donaghy favored the side that attracted more betting dollars in 23 of those 30 competitive games, or 77 percent of the time. In four games, he called the game neutrally, 50-50. The number of games in which Tim Donaghy favored the team that attracted fewer betting dollars? Three.
In other words, Donaghy's track record of making calls that favored his bet was 23-3-4.




quote:

When presented with that data, ESPN statisticians crunched the numbers and revealed: The odds that Tim Donaghy would have randomly made calls that produced that imbalance are 6,155-to-1.

Posted by BigBrod81
Houma
Member since Sep 2010
18955 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 5:43 pm to
quote:

Now I am looking at the article and it saying the guy won 60-70% of his bets when donaghy reffed. So that’s even worse. And backs B up even more that even when a ref is deliberately picking a side his impact is minimal compared to the players.


Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83334 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 5:47 pm to
Hmmm.

Looks like it's on my end.
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59684 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 5:51 pm to
leak. Whether Donaghy was using his whistle to fix games was beside the point. When Donaghy reffed and Concannon bet, the side he bet was covering the spread between 60 and 70 percent of the time.

Come on Bubba I can play the game too. So disregard the built in 50% of games that would go his way. He was maybe changing the result out of one or two games outta every ten.

Instead of 5-5. He would go 6-4 or 7-3.

And that’s not the point anyway. The point is even with his shenanigans the players could have made plays to render his calls useless. Care to post a box score for one of those games for me to point out 5 or 10 out of the 50 missed shots and turnovers that the losing team had? Or do we focus on the one of two calls and not the missed shots and turnovers. Defensive lapses. Etx etx.
This post was edited on 2/19/19 at 5:58 pm
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram