Started By
Message

re: How Donaghy fixed NBA games

Posted on 2/19/19 at 1:37 pm to
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72129 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

the ref bad calls may have had a part in it. Like if the refs hypothetically were cheating in the saints game. but it was not the only reason. and not the reason I will go with for the loss.
The OP was about actual documented cheating/attempts to fix games.

That is what this thread is about.

If you want to hold the mindset that “cheating doesn’t matter because the team should have won anyway”, you go right ahead.

I don’t understand your “defense of cheating” position, but whatever.

Your posts have literally nothing to do with the OP, unless you hold the position that cheating is acceptable because it doesn’t decide the outcomes of games.

Posted by JabarkusRussell
Member since Jul 2009
15825 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 1:41 pm to
I'm waiting for the how the NFL fixed games story.
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59695 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 1:46 pm to
I think it was pretty clear what my post said. IMO A foul in the third quarter of an nba game does not decide the outcome. there’s still 40 something possessions for each squad at that point in the game. That was one post.

If other people wanted to talk about other stuff. They could have. Heck they still can.
Posted by uway
Member since Sep 2004
33109 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 1:46 pm to
I’m just thankful he’s the only dishonest man to take advantage of such an obviously game-able system.
Posted by Akit1
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jul 2006
7614 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 1:48 pm to
I don’t think Donaghy was alone. But there were games in the past so suspect with Salvatore, Crawford and the ageless wonder - Dick Bavetta. Seemed like entertainment and not a sport.
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32507 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

This is ESPN's feeble attempt to try and convince fans and viewers that Donaghy was an isolated incident, a true outlier. Couldn't be further from the truth.

I love how you got 30+ upvotes for this post, when it's obvious that you didn't read the article. I doubt 30 people on this forum have.



ETA: I thought the article was really well written, and seemed to insinuate that it was possible that there were more refs involved, but that the NBA squashed the possibility of investigating that by leaking the story.
This post was edited on 2/19/19 at 1:57 pm
Posted by Allthatfades
Mississippi
Member since Aug 2014
6737 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

I think it was pretty clear what my post said. IMO A foul in the third quarter of an nba game does not decide the outcome. there’s still 40 something possessions for each squad at that point in the game. That was one post.


Here’s what you aren’t getting. If the team would have made plays in the 4th, the ref would have simply made more calls to ensure he got the outcome he wanted.
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59695 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 2:05 pm to
Here’s what you aren’t getting. If that were the case, the side the cheating ref wanted to win wouldn’t have lost so many times.
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32507 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 2:07 pm to
I'm sure he didn't read the article, but it explains that Tim Donaghy would call early illegal defense to ensure that the team would play weaker defense in the paint. He would also target team's best players with foul calls to get them pulled from the game early due to foul trouble. He was 23-3-4 over a span of 30 games (77%), and said that he could swing a game by 6 points in either direction. Obviously if there was a blowout, he wouldn't do anything about it.
Posted by BigBrod81
Houma
Member since Sep 2010
18963 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

IMO A foul in the third quarter of an nba game does not decide the outcome. there’s still 40 something possessions for each squad at that point in the game. 


Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171037 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

If that were the case, the side the cheating ref wanted to win wouldn’t have lost so many times.


quote:

He was 23-3-4 over a span of 30 games (77%


Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59695 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 2:11 pm to
What makes up the thirty games. What’s the criteria? And 77% proves me right. Not you. You are the one who said the ref could get whatever outcome he desired when it’s clear it wasn’t close to that.
Posted by BigBrod81
Houma
Member since Sep 2010
18963 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

What makes up the thirty games. What’s the criteria? And 77% proves me right. Not you. You are the one who said the ref could get whatever outcome he desired when it’s clear it wasn’t close to that.


Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171037 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

And 77% proves me right. Not you


On what planet?

You can't just claim things that aren't right, although I know that's 90% of your posts.

quote:

You are the one who said the ref could get whatever outcome he desired when it’s clear it wasn’t close to that.


He could 77% of the time. Pretty effective since you say refs can't control outcomes.
Posted by colorchangintiger
Dan Carlin
Member since Nov 2005
30979 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

Players determine the outcome of games. Not refs.








Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59695 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 2:19 pm to
Roughly half of the games he reffed would have been winners with no influence. of the other 50% of games 27% were winners, and 23% were losers.
Posted by BigBrod81
Houma
Member since Sep 2010
18963 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

Roughly half of the games he reffed would have been winners with no influence. of the other 50% of games 27% were winners, and 23% were losers.



Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32507 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

Roughly half of the games he reffed would have been winners with no influence. of the other 50% of games 27% were winners, and 23% were losers.

Did you read the article, or are you just posting bullshite?
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59695 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 2:23 pm to
C What are the thirty games sample you are talking about.
Posted by BigBrod81
Houma
Member since Sep 2010
18963 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

posting bullshite


first pageprev pagePage 6 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram