Started By
Message

re: Has betting completely ruined people’s minds?

Posted on 10/5/26 at 3:06 pm to
Posted by Dawgsontop34
Member since Jun 2014
46851 posts
Posted on 10/5/26 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

Hangover Haven


It’s is highly highly unlikely the Dolphins would win.

Probably a 0.5% chance or less.

Give me the 0% chance (historically) instead.
Posted by DawgCountry
Great State of GA
Member since Sep 2012
34044 posts
Posted on 10/5/26 at 3:32 pm to
the whole point it time. Time is more valuable than points. the very small risk of fumbling a snap and draining the clock is significantly more valuable than giving the other team to ball back with a chance you never get it back and lose. its a no brainer
Posted by Tifway419
Member since Sep 2022
2531 posts
Posted on 10/5/26 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

If they score, they are up by 2 scores with 2 minutes left. The dolphins have to score, get an onside, and score again to win. The chances that happens are less than the chance you fumble a snap.
I don’t have stats the back this up, but I find that hard to believe.

By sliding, you control the outcome of the game and there’s nothing the defense can do about it. Even if you do fumble the snap, which is <1% chance, you have the QB and 2 skill players lined up to recover it. Even if all that fails and the defense recovers the fumble, they still have to go down the field and score.

So yeah, sliding then kneeling probably gives you 10x greater chance at winning than scoring does. I’ve witnessed teams win many times before by scoring, recovering the onside, and scoring again. I’ve never seen a team lose who kneeled it.
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
38090 posts
Posted on 10/5/26 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

So yeah, sliding then kneeling probably gives you 10x greater chance at winning than scoring does


They’re both like 99.9%
Posted by DestrehanTiger
Houston, TX by way of Louisiana
Member since Nov 2005
13791 posts
Posted on 10/5/26 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

I’ve witnessed teams win many times before by scoring, recovering the onside, and scoring again


Define "many". I would guess that an NFL team with 0 timeouts down by 12 points has not scored 2 touchdowns in under 2 minutes with 0 timeouts very often in NFL history. It's even more unlikely with the NFL onside kick rules.

I am not arguing against kneeling. I'm just agreeing with Mingo that the difference in the odds for either option are infinitesimally small.
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
62856 posts
Posted on 10/5/26 at 3:42 pm to
quote:

“A fool and his money are soon parted.”


People who were on the Dolphins to cover didn’t part with their money. Everyone is ignoring the other side so they can bash gambling.

I get it, you probably think it’s bad for the game, and you hate the barrage of advertising.
Posted by GaryGator
The Swamp
Member since Jun 2017
7465 posts
Posted on 10/5/26 at 3:43 pm to
The NFL is controlled by Hard Rock, Draft Kings and the like.
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
26656 posts
Posted on 10/5/26 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

If they score, they are up by 2 scores with 2 minutes left. The dolphins have to score, get an onside, and score again to win. The chances that happens are less than the chance you fumble a snap.
I cannot ever remember a team fumbling a snap under center in victory formation. And even if they do fumble, there’s still a chance the offense recovers.

The odds of the trailing team scoring and recovering an onsides kick is higher than the odds of a fumbled snap in victory formation. And you avoid having to put your defense back on the field and risk an injury that would’ve been avoided by kneeling out the clock.
Posted by WaterLink
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2015
21056 posts
Posted on 10/5/26 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

How many times has someone scored, on side kicked, and scored again with 2 mins? I don't know either, but I'm curious.


The Cowboys did it against the Falcons a few years ago. So there's at least one.
Posted by Tiger503
Member since Sep 2026
31 posts
Posted on 10/5/26 at 4:08 pm to
quote:

I really don't think players are in on it, but


Sounds like deep down you already know the truth, but it's a hard pill to swallow.

If there are any others on the fence and need more examples, there's a certain YT channel that breaks it all down with a side of comedy.
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
70233 posts
Posted on 10/5/26 at 4:09 pm to
quote:

but it’s not like going up two scores and making the dolphins score, make a PAT (which is no longer a given), recover an onside, and score another TD is dumb.


there are other reasons why it is the smart play or right thing to do...like protecting your players from more plays and potential injuries.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram