- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Green Bay rejected trade proposal for Aaron Rodgers from the 49ers
Posted on 4/29/21 at 11:45 am to Draconian Sanctions
Posted on 4/29/21 at 11:45 am to Draconian Sanctions
Ok here’s the deal with Rogers.... he is a great QB, however he had a chance to score by running the football himself on that last third down they had. The whole right side of the end zone was wide open and he only would have run like 10 yards.... he has done this before and would have scored easily, however he tried to force a throw to his guy who was triple covered.... Yet everyone wants to blame the HC for going to a FG instead of letting Rogers have one last play..... what went on those last two plays is more on Rogers than the HC.......
1
Posted on 4/29/21 at 11:47 am to HeLeakin
After what they gave up for the pick, idk how you trade more Players and picks for a QB.
Posted on 4/29/21 at 11:52 am to HeLeakin
you miss 100% of the shots you dont take 
Posted on 4/29/21 at 11:59 am to crash1211
quote:
Rodgers must be pissed. I'm pretty sure he would like San Fran.
Posted on 4/29/21 at 12:52 pm to HeLeakin
I wonder what else in terms of picks and players was proposed.
If it was a healthy ransom and still didn’t move the needle for GB it makes the Love pick look even more ridiculous which is hard to imagine.
If it was a healthy ransom and still didn’t move the needle for GB it makes the Love pick look even more ridiculous which is hard to imagine.
This post was edited on 4/29/21 at 1:08 pm
Posted on 4/29/21 at 12:55 pm to CunningLinguist
quote:
It is more likely that the Packers are shopping Jordan Love at this point
I would be so fricking irate if they did this. I was told by all the Packers talking heads that "they got their guy of the future", it was a great pick despite the fact it did zero to help a team with Super Bowl aspirations, etc etc...so now I'm supposed to believe he's suddenly NOT the future (I never thought he was) and has any trade value after virtually every team in the league passed on him and he wasn't good enough in year 1 to even suit up for a game?! fricking kidding me?
HE COULDN'T BEAT OUT TIM BOYLE ON THE DEPTH CHART.
Posted on 4/29/21 at 12:57 pm to dukke v
quote:
Ok here’s the deal with Rogers.... he is a great QB, however he had a chance to score by running the football himself on that last third down they had. The whole right side of the end zone was wide open and he only would have run like 10 yards.... he has done this before and would have scored easily, however he tried to force a throw to his guy who was triple covered.... Yet everyone wants to blame the HC for going to a FG instead of letting Rogers have one last play..... what went on those last two plays is more on Rogers than the HC.......
Posted on 4/29/21 at 12:58 pm to crash1211
quote:
Rodgers must be pissed. I'm pretty sure he would like San Fran.
Because hes supposedly gay,because he grew up in California, or because he likes the smell of his own farts?
Posted on 4/29/21 at 1:00 pm to HeLeakin
Smart move by the packers
Posted on 4/29/21 at 1:01 pm to Tigerpride18
quote:
Because hes supposedly gay,because he grew up in California, or because he likes the smell of his own farts?
Yes?
Posted on 4/29/21 at 1:03 pm to HeLeakin
I mean if you think about it, the number 3 pick isnt as valuable if you arent looking to draft a qb. Getting Jimmy G isnt that great of a trade piece for a team that has already drafted jordan love. If you're green bay and Rodgers is gone ,you arent signing any kind of bridge qb considering hes already had that and learned a lot last year.
Posted on 4/29/21 at 1:04 pm to Chucktown_Badger
Please explain how I’m wrong.
Posted on 4/29/21 at 1:07 pm to dukke v
quote:
Please explain how I’m wrong.
Can I first?
Posted on 4/29/21 at 1:08 pm to dukke v
That play was broken down 10 ways from Sunday and him scoring was not a sure thing. I had no problem with taking the field goal. Going for it would've required a 4th down conversion on a condensed field and a 2 pt conversion. If either of those fails, you need to get another stop anyway. That loss was on the defense, as is tradition despite us using an insane amount of draft capital on it the past 10 years.
Kevin King doesn't get torched for an inexplicable 40 yard TD on the last play of the first half and that game looks a lot different.
Kevin King doesn't get torched for an inexplicable 40 yard TD on the last play of the first half and that game looks a lot different.
This post was edited on 4/29/21 at 1:09 pm
Posted on 4/29/21 at 1:09 pm to dukke v
quote:
Please explain how I’m wrong.
If LaFleur told Rodgers "this is four down territory, so you have two plays to get 8 yards", he probably would have run on that 3rd down play. He wouldn't have scored but would have gotten 4-5 yards.
Posted on 4/29/21 at 1:13 pm to VADawg
bullshite.... Rogers had a wide open right side of the end zone... he could have scored with ease..... go back and look at the play.....
Posted on 4/29/21 at 1:15 pm to Tigerpride18
I'll just first say,if you watched that play again and think he was easily going to score,then you dont have a grasp on the speed of the game . Hell,it would have been hard to score from where he was against high school players,much less nfl guys.
Those nfl players close on you so fast its unreal.
Also,I think the league mvp has a better feel for that situation then a guy on the internet who has a career batting average of about .050 on his sports takes/predictions.
In other words ,you said it yourself,hes done that before ,so it would make sense that he would know whether or not he could make it . If you watch his eyes,you can tell he thought about it.
Those nfl players close on you so fast its unreal.
Also,I think the league mvp has a better feel for that situation then a guy on the internet who has a career batting average of about .050 on his sports takes/predictions.
In other words ,you said it yourself,hes done that before ,so it would make sense that he would know whether or not he could make it . If you watch his eyes,you can tell he thought about it.
Posted on 4/29/21 at 1:18 pm to dukke v
quote:
he could have scored with ease..... go back and look at the play.....
Ok.
quote:
Also,I think the league mvp has a better feel for that situation then a guy on the internet who has a career batting average of about .050 on his sports takes/predictions.
This post was edited on 4/29/21 at 1:22 pm
Posted on 4/29/21 at 1:26 pm to Chucktown_Badger
He could have scored with ease.... he was already running that way and any kind of pump fake would have froze the defense. But ok I’ll play, let’s say somehow he gets tackled at the two yard line. Do they go for a FG then????? Bottom line is that he threw into triple coverage when he could have made a possible great play... IMO that’s why they lost the game.
Posted on 4/29/21 at 1:30 pm to crash1211
quote:
I'm pretty sure he would like San Fran.
he would get so much arse
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News