Started By
Message

re: Fernando Tatis jr : How a $2million loan/investment turns to owing $34million

Posted on 5/25/26 at 10:12 am to
Posted by TigerOnThe Hill
Springhill, LA
Member since Sep 2008
7577 posts
Posted on 5/25/26 at 10:12 am to
quote:

Hiring a lawyer is not always an expense. It's an investment.

Yeah, but when you hire hime to bring a suit and lose, it becomes an expense.
Posted by Big4SALTbro
Member since Jun 2019
24458 posts
Posted on 5/25/26 at 10:18 am to
The only bit that is somewhat predatory is the 10 percent is before tax. So it’s really more like 20 percent since you have taxes pulled out first.

However, it’s not like normal agents get their cut after tax so not really predatory.

It’s just weird Tatis Jr needed it considering his daddy
Posted by Undertow
Member since Sep 2016
9146 posts
Posted on 5/25/26 at 10:19 am to
Sounds like a large scale payday loan. Couldn’t he have just taken out a conventional loan for $2M and owed only interest? Surely with his potential he could have found an institution to pull the trigger on that?
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
98367 posts
Posted on 5/25/26 at 10:24 am to
Good hes a clown

Padres should trade him and Machado while they can
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
98367 posts
Posted on 5/25/26 at 10:25 am to
His father made 20mil in his career

He didnt need a loan. Hes an idiot
Posted by lsufanva
sandston virginia
Member since Aug 2009
13574 posts
Posted on 5/25/26 at 10:34 am to
quote:

He should absolutely have to pay it back. We dont excuse the loans of the poor and stupid; we shouldn't forgive the loans of the rich and stupid.


He should have to pay the money, no argument there. That said, it wasn't a loan as clearly stated above. It was an investment, wager may be the better term, in which if he failed he owed nothing back. In essence, they believed in him more than he believed in himself. They bet on it in fact. And won large.
Posted by danilo
Member since Nov 2008
25766 posts
Posted on 5/25/26 at 10:37 am to
quote:

His father made 20mil in his career He didnt need a loan. Hes an idiot

On top of that Jr had a 700k signing bonus when he was 16 and he was in the show by the time he was 20
quote:

Tatis agreed to a $700,000 bonus when he signed with the Chicago White Sox in 2015
This post was edited on 5/25/26 at 10:59 am
Posted by go ta hell ole miss
Member since Jan 2007
14686 posts
Posted on 5/25/26 at 10:46 am to
quote:

so he shouldn't need a awful loan like this


He did not need it. He wanted to live above his means in the minors. It was an advance toward a percentage of future earnings if they came into existence, not a loan.

I guarantee if he had not made it to the big leagues he would not have thought it was just a loan. Plenty of young people signing these agreements are going to come to realize they are going to be held accountable, many for the first time in their life.
Posted by JoeyP239
Member since Nov 2025
1299 posts
Posted on 5/25/26 at 10:57 am to
This is basically what the music industry does. They will make an investment in bands, and if the band doesn’t blow up then the band keeps whatever they were paid, but if they do blow up the record company is gonna get most of their sales.

Tatis real issue is thinking he needed that loan to eventually make it. I’m sure MLB Advance is only giving out these loans to elite prospects that have a high a chance of making it. Giving these deals out to low level guys who could just take the money and then basically quit would be the real risk to them.

This exact thing happens a lot in tennis for 14-16 year old prospects. They either have private investors signing deals like this or IMG is doing it
Posted by OU Guy
Member since Feb 2022
30166 posts
Posted on 5/25/26 at 11:32 am to
He used that money to improve his body and skills by hiring the best trainers and equipment. Without that is it possible he isn’t as good and thus never gets close to the big contract he got?

In the end he still made out. There is no way to tell but he signed the contract and I’m glad he lost.
Posted by HagaDaga
Member since Oct 2020
7933 posts
Posted on 5/25/26 at 11:56 am to
quote:

Some lawyers need to form an independent firm advising athletes because this will be a growing trend as NIL evolves
lawyers can advise all they want, but investors aren't going to give teens a ton of money for nothing. And the lawyers will be on the players dime, so when they see that bill they won't be happy either. Cause lawyers aren't doing it for nothing either.

Schools will end up being for ed to provide the lawyers for a bunch of one and dones.
Posted by mule74
Watersound Beach
Member since Nov 2004
12871 posts
Posted on 5/25/26 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

Sounds like a good judge. How many athletes flame out that Big League Advance gets $0 return?


This. The model is based on 10 to 20% of the investments being a (no pun intended) “home run.”

Those payouts cover the investments that are losers.

Also, for people who have literally nothing, the opportunity to get guaranteed immediate access to life-changing money can often make a lot of sense even if eventually it cost them a significant amount down the road.

It’s very similar to a VC model. Some businesses need the initial cash infusion to develop. Most of the investments are losers. For the businesses that succeed, a substantial amount of their equity is now owned by their investors.
This post was edited on 5/25/26 at 12:06 pm
Posted by HagaDaga
Member since Oct 2020
7933 posts
Posted on 5/25/26 at 12:03 pm to
I'm sure it's not much different than how the European/Latin American/etc soccer markets have been doing it for decades.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram