- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/25/26 at 12:41 pm to ragincajun03
Bottom line is Pete Nakos doesn’t know shite about what any team spends. It’s a guess based on what they value players and the value is a guess. All these deals are not public.
Posted on 2/25/26 at 12:44 pm to Buttermilk Pancakes
quote:
2,3, 4 years ago... Tiger fans were "we want players with chest and heart" not paid merchants.
Just 2 years ago LSU fans cried about Ohio State spending money on their roster for 30M. Gonna be fun watching them call the pot kettle black
38-24
Posted on 2/25/26 at 12:51 pm to tzimme4
The timeline is now. There is no rebuilding in college football. If LSU doesn’t win the championship this coming year thats a massive failure.
Posted on 2/25/26 at 2:06 pm to StroKat
Well that's ridiculous, LSU making the playoff is the goal then they will go from there
Posted on 2/25/26 at 2:28 pm to tzimme4
That’s ridiculous even with a $40M roster?
I have no clue if that’s accurate or not
I have no clue if that’s accurate or not
Posted on 2/25/26 at 3:03 pm to Tridentds
quote:
2,3, 4 years ago... Tiger fans were "we want players with chest and heart" not paid merchants. But now... No, we don't forget.
And what has changed in the 2, 3, 4 years?
Posted on 2/25/26 at 3:18 pm to StroKat
quote:Completely new staff and system with completely new players, and you think a championship first season is the right barometer? That would be as impressive a coaching job as Cignetti’s
There is no rebuilding in college football. If LSU doesn’t win the championship this coming year thats a massive failure.
$40m isn’t going to be the annual baseline anyway. If you have legitimate championship aspirations and want to put your foot down as a power right away (which snowballs recruiting momentum), Year 1 entails rebuilding a full roster that’s going to be expensive. If they’re spending this every year they’d have a problem but that’s not realistically going to happen
This post was edited on 2/25/26 at 3:20 pm
Posted on 2/25/26 at 3:33 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
How in the absolute frick did that nearly triple in such a short time? This shite is beyond stupid.
Because it’s getting closer to the revenue the big time colleges are making. Don’t think the players don’t know how much the biggest brands are making
This post was edited on 2/25/26 at 3:37 pm
Posted on 2/25/26 at 3:35 pm to PCRammer
When the Marlins beat the Yankees in the world series they had 24 million dollar roster that year.
A rod made 25 million that year.
A rod made 25 million that year.
Posted on 2/25/26 at 3:52 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
That’s ridiculous even with a $40M roster?
While I do think our team is stacked on paper, a lot of that $40 million wasn’t on 5 star headliners. We had to fill in a ton of depth to replace the outgoing players from the previous regime. I’d venture to say there are at least a handful of other teams with as much talent, if not a little more depth than us.
I think at least winning one playoff game would make this season a “success.”
Posted on 2/25/26 at 4:04 pm to Tridentds
Things changed in 4 years in cfb ya tool.
Posted on 2/25/26 at 4:41 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
have no clue if that’s accurate or not
Nobody does and it's idiotic to throw out speculative numbers on nothing but hearsay
Posted on 2/25/26 at 4:52 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
LESS THAN FIVE years ago the big talking point was that it would cost $15M to construct a championship caliber roster.
How in the absolute frick did that nearly triple in such a short time?
Deregulation. Five years ago you didn't have unlimited, immediately eligible transfers. You had signing/scholarship limits.
LSU brought in 59 new players this offseason.
Posted on 2/25/26 at 5:06 pm to ragincajun03
Amazing what pur boosters will fork over for some mercs who will probably have NO loyalty to the institution.....beyond one year
Posted on 2/25/26 at 5:10 pm to WG_Dawg
I distinctly remember being called a retard for predicting this exact thing would happen
Posted on 2/25/26 at 6:53 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
Amazing what pur boosters will fork over for some mercs who will probably have NO loyalty to the institution.....beyond one year
They’re trying to take credit if we win which equals business and political capital. It’s a marketing expense for Todd Graves
Posted on 2/25/26 at 6:58 pm to msutiger
quote:
I seem to remember a lot of rocks being thrown at A&M for "buying a roster" ... It appears those rocks were being launched in front of a glass maison
Don’t mean before it was legal or do you mean a few years ago when they still went 8-4 with Jimbo?
Posted on 2/25/26 at 7:04 pm to ragincajun03
These numbers are lies. And it wouldn’t surprise me if LSU leaks them because no school wants to me known as cheap
Popular
Back to top



1





