Started By
Message

re: CFB teams robbed of a National Title

Posted on 11/9/20 at 11:40 am to
Posted by TexasTiger08
Member since Oct 2006
28934 posts
Posted on 11/9/20 at 11:40 am to
quote:

never remember that PSU team as this vaunted monster. In fact, it wasn't until I joined Tigerdroppings and these periodic discussions pop up did I ever hear '94 Penn State described as this mythical juggernaut.



Same here. No doubt they are a great team. Anybody who goes undefeated in a P5 is a great team. I’d wager that some of those 1-loss Ohio State teams under Cooper were better, though.
Posted by RandySavage
9 Time Natty Winner
Member since May 2012
34605 posts
Posted on 11/11/20 at 9:24 am to
quote:

Not really the 83 team was 10-1 the 1 loss was 20-7 loss at home to Texas who’s only loss was by 1 in the Cotton Bowl. With a lack luster Sugar Bowl win hard to argue Auburn should be #1 over Miami who beat the team that was #1 all year.


I could see an argument for Texas or maybe even Nebraska but no way Miami deserved the title over Auburn. Prior to the Nebraska game they beat one team that finished ranked all season and got destroyed by Florida.

Auburn played one of the most difficult schedules of all time prior to conference championship games and playoffs. Their last 5 games were against teams in the Top 20 and 4 in the top 8.
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
24959 posts
Posted on 11/11/20 at 9:33 am to
Auburn 2004
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
60664 posts
Posted on 11/11/20 at 9:52 am to
quote:

I could see an argument for Texas or maybe even Nebraska but no way Miami deserved the title over Auburn. Prior to the Nebraska game they beat one team that finished ranked all season and got destroyed by Florida


Fair enough but they lost to Florida week 1 28-3 Auburn lost to Texas 20-7 that’s not that big of a difference. Nebraska and Texas screwed the pooch by losing each by 1. Nebraska also could have just kicked the PAT and probably would have won it. This is a season we needed the BCS. Nebraska vs Texas no debate
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
60664 posts
Posted on 11/11/20 at 9:54 am to
quote:

Auburn 2004


Question for all those saying Auburn 2004. Who should have been left out? And whoever it was would be here saying they were screwed
Posted by RandySavage
9 Time Natty Winner
Member since May 2012
34605 posts
Posted on 11/11/20 at 10:00 am to
quote:

Fair enough but they lost to Florida week 1 28-3 Auburn lost to Texas 20-7 that’s not that big of a difference.


It's almost a 2 touchdown difference but semantics really. What separates them is the schedule and that tilts in Auburn's favor and it's not even close.

An Auburn, Miami, Texas, Nebraska playoff would have been nice.
Posted by Ross
Member since Oct 2007
47827 posts
Posted on 11/11/20 at 10:00 am to
quote:

Auburn 83 and obviously 04



I’ll die on the hill of 1983 Auburn being hosed

2004 sucked but the system was designed to suck for a year like that one with three undefeated AQ teams.
This post was edited on 11/11/20 at 10:01 am
Posted by S
RIP Wayde
Member since Jan 2007
168335 posts
Posted on 11/11/20 at 10:05 am to
Aub 2004 probably deserved a shot at the title but were they beating usc? Likely not especially given they played the previous two seasons with sc winning both.

Posted by cramps
Member since Oct 2012
2465 posts
Posted on 11/11/20 at 10:06 am to
quote:

Washington and Miami could've both beaten that OU team.


I dunno, that team had some magic on their side and a great offense.

Auburn should have played USC for the '04 natty.

FSU beat 6 ranked teams in '93 including Notre Dame in South Bend, so that worked out. The Irish got payback from Boston College for running it up on them the previous year.


**Oof. FSU lost in South Bend, but their overall body of work was better anyway.
This post was edited on 11/11/20 at 10:54 am
Posted by TexasTiger08
Member since Oct 2006
28934 posts
Posted on 11/11/20 at 10:12 am to
quote:

FSU beat 6 ranked teams in '93 including Notre Dame in South Bend,


They lost to Notre Dame...
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
60664 posts
Posted on 11/11/20 at 10:15 am to
quote:

I’ll die on the hill of 1983 Auburn being hosed



Give me the argument for Auburn over Texas who beat you at Auburn 20-7
Posted by Ross
Member since Oct 2007
47827 posts
Posted on 11/11/20 at 10:54 am to
Auburn played the tougher schedule between those two teams (and I don’t recall it being particularly close, but I think some more modern analytics can tell us just how far apart the resumes were). But I'm fairly confident in claiming that Auburn faced the nation’s most difficult schedule of any contender in 1983, including 7 opponents that were ranked in the top 20. Of their 12 opponents faced during 1983, 10 finished the season with a winning record and 9 appeared in a bowl game.

And I know you don’t personally put any credence to the notion of losing later mattering any more or less than losing early, but if you were someone that did think games later in the season should be weighted more heavily, they did lose their last game to Georgia; a team Auburn had beaten only a few weeks prior, and the H2H game between Auburn and Texas occurred in Week 2.
This post was edited on 11/11/20 at 11:01 am
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
60664 posts
Posted on 11/11/20 at 11:10 am to
its not just later, they lost the bowl I could along with lost later if Auburn had lost to someone else or if it was at Austin week 2 but head to head loss at home is tougher sell for me.

Auburn definitely has great case on the overall resume
Posted by CRDNLSCHMCPSN11
Member since Dec 2014
18212 posts
Posted on 11/11/20 at 11:17 am to
A few years ago I watched the full game on YouTube. And the game wasn't as close as the final score indicated. Notre Dame jumped out to a 24-7 lead in the 3rd quarter. Florida St. only made it interesting late in the 4th quarter on a fluke tipped pass.

Unfortunately for Notre Dame, they laid a big fat egg at home the next week. I remember watching that too live in my youth completely baffled how that happened.
Posted by Ross
Member since Oct 2007
47827 posts
Posted on 11/11/20 at 11:20 am to
quote:

its not just later, they lost the bowl I could along with lost later if Auburn had lost to someone else or if it was at Austin week 2 but head to head loss at home is tougher sell for me.


well for someone on my side the argument it is quite the inconvenient data point

but I think on strength of resume they can overcome that data point. A cursory glance on Texas schedule and it looks far inferior
Posted by TexasTiger08
Member since Oct 2006
28934 posts
Posted on 11/11/20 at 11:32 am to
quote:

its not just later, they lost the bowl I could along with lost later if Auburn had lost to someone else or if it was at Austin week 2 but head to head loss at home is tougher sell for me.



There’s no substitute for the head to head matchup. Texas literally fumbled away an opportunity, and I mentioned Auburn in my original post as someone who had a great resume’, but this logic does dictate that Texas has a case too.

This is similar to the crowd who loves 2000 Miami, but won’t mention the same Washington team that beat the Canes.
Posted by RandySavage
9 Time Natty Winner
Member since May 2012
34605 posts
Posted on 11/11/20 at 11:33 am to
quote:

Likely not especially given they played the previous two seasons with sc winning both.


UGA and LSU both whooped us worse than USC in 03 and we beat both (UGA easily) in 04. Of all the arguments that's the worst one.
Posted by S
RIP Wayde
Member since Jan 2007
168335 posts
Posted on 11/11/20 at 11:35 am to
Bruh jason Campbell wasn’t beating that usc team
Posted by RandySavage
9 Time Natty Winner
Member since May 2012
34605 posts
Posted on 11/11/20 at 11:35 am to
quote:

Give me the argument for Auburn over Texas who beat you at Auburn 20-7


First game of the season vs. last game of the season, and that used to be a big deal.

Auburn's schedule was exponentially harder.
Posted by RandySavage
9 Time Natty Winner
Member since May 2012
34605 posts
Posted on 11/11/20 at 11:35 am to
quote:

Bruh jason Campbell wasn’t beating that usc team


1st round draft pick and SEC POTY? Had a better career than Matt Leinart.

Al Borges was our Joe Brady
This post was edited on 11/11/20 at 11:36 am
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram