Started By
Message

re: Carson Palmer under fire for Joe Burrow comments ahead of Super Bowl

Posted on 2/11/22 at 3:57 pm to
Posted by dnm3305
Member since Feb 2009
13633 posts
Posted on 2/11/22 at 3:57 pm to
Who is more qualified to speak on this subject than Carson Palmer? He played the exact same position for the exact same franchise, obviously. If any single person on the planet can question this and throw this out there, it's Carson Palmer. This isn't controversial in any way.
Posted by smash williams
San Diego
Member since Apr 2009
19766 posts
Posted on 2/11/22 at 4:03 pm to
It totally sounds like something Palmer would do but definitely don’t see Burrow having that same reaction.

Isn’t he the same person that started the “Burrow shouldn’t go to Cincy” talk before the draft.

Also the timing of the comment is pretty shitty too, they are 2 days away from playing in the SB.
This post was edited on 2/11/22 at 4:07 pm
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111208 posts
Posted on 2/11/22 at 4:08 pm to
quote:

“I think Joe’s gonna sit back after this game, win or lose and be like ‘man, am I gonna re-sign with this team? Are they willing to do what it takes to continuously build to get back to the next Super Bowl?
Man, that's a pretty dumb take.
Posted by TackySweater
Member since Dec 2020
12411 posts
Posted on 2/11/22 at 4:08 pm to
quote:

That in no way contradicts itself


So deserve doesn’t equal market value in your thought process.
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164532 posts
Posted on 2/11/22 at 4:21 pm to
Burrow is going to sign with the Heat
Posted by QJenk
Atl, Ga
Member since Jan 2013
15390 posts
Posted on 2/11/22 at 4:31 pm to
Sounds like Carson is jealous that Joe did in 1 year what he couldn't do in 8 years.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112384 posts
Posted on 2/11/22 at 4:52 pm to
I’m not sure why people are trying to defend the bengals here they are an insanely cheap franchise, and they are likely not prepared to do what it takes to build a consistent winner. Palmer is absolutely correct in what he’s saying. They just happened to luck into the correct QB at the right time. That doesn’t magically make them smart

Don’t confuse an elite QB masking front office deficiencies with a well functioning front office/owner. Setting the bar this high is only going to make it more frustrating when Mike Brown is counting the dimes on the vending machines.

And the Bengals making it in Joes second season doesn’t guarantee them they’ll ever reach these heights again. I would be shocked if they didn’t bc of how I feel about Burrow, but Mahommes is undoubtedly the most talented QB in the league putting up some of the best numbers we’ve ever seen, with a good HC, great weapons, and a good to really good defense, and he’s still gone home two years in a row. Look at Rodgers career since winning one super early. Same for Big Ben to a lesser extent. These are HOF QBs. It’s hard enough to win one, it takes a massive organizational effort to win multiple.
Posted by DirtyDawg
President of the East Cobb Snobs
Member since Aug 2013
15539 posts
Posted on 2/11/22 at 4:56 pm to
Maybe read the text and the subtext.

Because I clearly was implying the QB deserves to be paid for his talent and services, but if said QB is actually interested in winning they would consider giving the team a haircut on their contract.

And we're also discussing the difference in them getting paid 35 million a year vs. 15-25 million a year. Fair market value is out the window here because these are grown men splitting hairs on contracts to play a kid's game.

How much will Joe Burrow's life change if he has to all of a sudden live off of 20 million a year instead of 35 million a year?
Posted by 21JumpStreet
Member since Jul 2012
14665 posts
Posted on 2/11/22 at 4:59 pm to
Go play for the saints. He would become an absolute legend and surpass breesus
This post was edited on 2/11/22 at 5:00 pm
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112384 posts
Posted on 2/11/22 at 5:02 pm to
quote:

How much will Joe Burrow's life change if he has to all of a sudden live off of 20 million a year instead of 35 million a year?


That adds up to somewhere between 75-150 million over the course of a 5-10 year long contract that QBs can sign these days
Posted by DirtyDawg
President of the East Cobb Snobs
Member since Aug 2013
15539 posts
Posted on 2/11/22 at 5:10 pm to
Tom Brady more than made up for those "lost wages" via endorsements and deals he was able to swing via his talent and image as a champion. Win ball games and titles, and the brands will write you a blank check.

I get what you're saying about money being left on the table, but the QB in question would still be sitting on 100-200 million if they had a 20 mill a year deal over the course of 5-10 years.

They're more than taken care of, and as I mentioned about Tom, they can use sponsorships to bridge that gap in "lost wages".

They're still taking home generational wealth with either path, I just personally see max QB contracts as stupid and a way to handicap your team's chances at winning year in and year out. I'd rather win like crazy and take home a paltry 100-200 million, than take home 350 million and be known as the guy who never won anything.
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
47967 posts
Posted on 2/11/22 at 5:45 pm to
quote:

That in no way contradicts itself


So if Burrow is the best in the world you don’t think he’ll ask for what Mahomes is getting for not being as good as him?
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112384 posts
Posted on 2/11/22 at 5:55 pm to
quote:

Tom Brady more than made up for those "lost wages" via endorsements and deals he was able to swing via his talent and image as a champion. Win ball games and titles, and the brands will write you a blank check.


That’s not how it works. No matter how much endorsement money you make, it doesn’t change the missed opportunity for that 75-150 million.

Plus Brady had the benefit of a super rich wife

And the brands will write you a blank check regardless of your superbowls if you’re good and a good personality.

quote:

get what you're saying about money being left on the table, but the QB in question would still be sitting on 100-200 million if they had a 20 mill a year deal over the course of 5-10 years.



It’s a lot easier to tell someone else to turn down that much money

Gaining wealth isn’t just about living a comfortable life, at a certain point it becomes about generational wealth.

quote:

They're more than taken care of, and as I mentioned about Tom, they can use sponsorships to bridge that gap in "lost wages".


You’re overstating how much real money brady left on the table, and how much sponsorships have made up for it. Brady sacrificed by putting himself in a worse contractural situation at times to allow the team freedom to make moves, but he still is at the very top end of QB earners during that time. Now he probably left some bucks on the table towards the end of his career when the QB salaries basically doubled over the course of a few years- at that point yes he wasn’t really concerned about getting every dollar on the contract. But make no mistake he still made elite QB money during his career.

Also guess what? Those endorsements are an actual job! Those companies are paying for your time and effort. It’s not like you’re just getting an endorsement check for being good at football, choosing to “make up” that money in endorsements is going to take up a huge portion of your already limited off time during your career.

quote:

They're still taking home generational wealth with either path, I just personally see max QB contracts as stupid and a way to handicap your team's chances at winning year in and year out. I'd rather win like crazy and take home a paltry 100-200 million, than take home 350 million and be known as the guy who never won anything.


Again, super easy to tell someone else to walk away from 150 million dollars. Might not be so easy if it were actually in front of you.

Also there’s a massive gulf of possibilities between those two choices. As I mentioned with the Brady deals, there’s a number of ways to get paid your market value and still allow your team to have the cap flexibility and cash it needs to make the moves it needs to do to win.


ETA and none of this takes into account that Burrow could have a career ending or career altering injury at any point. We’re making so many assumptions about a lot of things to come with getting paid less: staying healthy, staying elite, winning, winning superbowls, hell winning on Sunday). Not getting paid doesn’t guarantee any of those things
This post was edited on 2/11/22 at 6:00 pm
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
65368 posts
Posted on 2/11/22 at 6:02 pm to
quote:

Apple basically won the game for CIN keeping hill out the end zone. People around here will always hate on the guy bc he made disparaging comments about New Orleans and apparently wasn’t a great player as a Saint.

I’ve never been a Saints fan. I’m not from Louisiana and have no reason to be. But I’ve watched every Bengals game, and Apple gets burned quite a bit. PFF has plenty of questionable rankings, not just Apple. It generally serves a purpose but it’s also not an exact science either.

That said, Apple isn’t terrible all the time either and has made some very important stops

Aside from Apple, Palmer has been throwing shade at Cincinnati in re Burrow going/staying there since before the draft. There’s definitely still bitterness tgere
This post was edited on 2/11/22 at 6:04 pm
Posted by TrouserTrout
Member since Nov 2017
6425 posts
Posted on 2/11/22 at 6:03 pm to
Palmer is jealous he couldn’t do what Burrow has done in his first full year.
Posted by chalupa
Member since Jan 2011
6763 posts
Posted on 2/11/22 at 7:08 pm to
[
This post was edited on 6/5/22 at 1:40 pm
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112384 posts
Posted on 2/11/22 at 7:10 pm to
quote:

might be a bit off, but I know Mahomes was .5B/10 yrs.


Mahommes has a very team friendly deal. The overall number means nothing.
Posted by TigerNlc
Chocolate City
Member since Jun 2006
32524 posts
Posted on 2/11/22 at 9:27 pm to
quote:

Palmer is jealous he couldn’t do what Burrow has done in his first full year.

I don’t think he’s jealous. I think he’s bitter with the bengals and has reason to be. He was questioning the bengal’s organization for their commitment to win before the draft when everyone knew they were drafting Burrow.
Posted by UKWildcats
Lexington, KY
Member since Mar 2015
17289 posts
Posted on 2/11/22 at 11:11 pm to
He left here butthurt. Take Carson's with a grain of salt. Troy and Katie Blackburn are running the show now, Mike Brown basically just has veto power but has quit messing with stuff. We've got a GM. We finally built a ring of honor.

A shite load of stuff has changed in Cincinnati in the past couple of years. The way business was done when Carson was here....my God we drafted him 20 yrs ago. Cmon.
Posted by lob1284
Houma by birth
Member since Mar 2006
4928 posts
Posted on 2/12/22 at 7:53 am to
I don’t understand how ppl can play the Bengals are cheap card at this moment, considering their defense is what has mostly carried them through this playoff run. Mike Hilton, Vonn bell, DJ Reader, Hendrickson, Awuzie, Ogunjobi, BJ Hill (traded for) have all been hits and they were mostly the result of some big FA spending. Go look at the past couple years.

Also they’ve obviously drafted well, so I don’t necessarily buy the criticism of them being light in the scouting department. Honestly why should it matter how many scouts you employ if you’re doing a good job with the draft?

I don’t get how Carson can just gloss over the facts around how this current Bengals team was built because he played there a decade ago.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram