- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Caitlin Clark is shooting 31% from 3 and was 34% last season
Posted on 6/14/25 at 7:16 pm to lsupride87
Posted on 6/14/25 at 7:16 pm to lsupride87
K
1
Posted on 6/14/25 at 7:20 pm to TackySweater
Posted on 6/14/25 at 7:22 pm to KingofthePoint
quote:for the NBA, yes. don't have to look that up.
they are objectively bad percentages for 3pt shooting
but for all I know that could be the best ever in WNBA, which is the point I was making.
Posted on 6/14/25 at 7:23 pm to lsupride87
Thanks for helping me with my argument I guess
Posted on 6/14/25 at 7:53 pm to lsupride87
quote:Generational talent.
She is 32nd in eFG%
Posted on 6/14/25 at 8:01 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
Generational talent.
Where’s the 50 players? Why do you always disappear?
Posted on 6/14/25 at 8:25 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
Generational talent.
Your Bayou Queen is rolling out a 32% FG inside 5 feet.
GeNErATIonAl.
Posted on 6/14/25 at 8:30 pm to GalacticaCannon
quote:
Your Bayou Queen is rolling out a 32% FG inside 5 feet.
BuT mUh ReBoUnDs
Posted on 6/14/25 at 8:34 pm to GalacticaCannon
quote:Nobody is calling "Bayou Queen" generational. She's having a terrible year on a terrible team.
Generational talent.
Your Bayou Queen is rolling out a 32% FG inside 5 feet.
GeNErATIonAl.
You Cait Queens have reached cult status.
Posted on 6/14/25 at 8:38 pm to TX Tiger
Can you stop running from my posts?
Posted on 6/15/25 at 7:59 am to PrimeTime Money
to be fair, she does take a lot of tough shots, 4-5 feet past the 3pt line(top of key), etc. moving 3pt'ers,etc
I would call many of her shots, bad choices, but does seem to hit a good chunk of them. at iowa, she had to take those shots
I would call many of her shots, bad choices, but does seem to hit a good chunk of them. at iowa, she had to take those shots
Posted on 6/15/25 at 8:50 am to iwyLSUiwy
quote:
white male boomer wnba fans
I said last night that I regret not buying the 22 Fever tshirt that I laughed at in Dicks. My wife asked why I would ever wear one, and I said just to frick with people and get some laughs when I’m in Lowe’s or the grocery store.
Posted on 6/15/25 at 10:49 am to TX Tiger
quote:That's because she's terrible.
She's having a terrible year on a terrible team.
Posted on 6/15/25 at 10:50 am to GalacticaCannon
quote:
Your Bayou Queen is rolling out a 32% FG inside 5 feet.
Clark career .52 eFG%
Reese career .39 eFG%
Clark is not a generational shooter even for womens basketball standards. Comparing her to curry is dumb as shite
End of story
She is more of a Westbrook or Luka comp. Exciting player that takes a lot of shots
For perspective, curry has a .58 career eFG%
That is generational for a shooter
This post was edited on 6/15/25 at 11:14 am
Posted on 6/15/25 at 11:08 am to lsupride87
her eFG% is .526 for her career. LINK
Posted on 6/15/25 at 11:11 am to antman123
I’ll update finger hit 4 instead of 5
This post was edited on 6/15/25 at 11:12 am
Posted on 6/15/25 at 2:23 pm to lsupride87
quote:
generational shooter
She’s a generational playmaker. I don’t think anyone ever argued her being an elite pure shooter. She does pop from deep deep range better than anyone this mediocre league has before though.
Posted on 6/15/25 at 3:46 pm to PrimeTime Money
It really is a shame for Clark that she showed up when she did. She’s never going to get to just be who she is. She’s a generational talent in the women’s game, virtually guaranteed to be a huge part of its history, but she still can’t hang with her elite male counterparts. Not her fault, just how it is. It takes nothing away from her game, or shouldn’t, anyway. That’s why they have separate leagues.
But the media has been absolutely insufferable in promoting the women’s game because of her and provoked a lot of reactive backlash from this unwarranted oversaturation. She’s not allowed to just be a really good women’s bball player, she has to be “Curry but female” or whatever when she obviously isn’t talented enough for that.
But the media has been absolutely insufferable in promoting the women’s game because of her and provoked a lot of reactive backlash from this unwarranted oversaturation. She’s not allowed to just be a really good women’s bball player, she has to be “Curry but female” or whatever when she obviously isn’t talented enough for that.
This post was edited on 6/15/25 at 3:47 pm
Posted on 6/15/25 at 3:52 pm to OKBoomerSooner
quote:Excellent observation.
She’s not allowed to just be a really good women’s bball player, she has to be “Curry but female” or whatever when she obviously isn’t talented enough for that.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 5:09 pm to PrimeTime Money
Bump
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News