- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Bengals players reportedly want team to consider bringing in Colin Kaepernick
Posted on 9/18/17 at 10:51 am to cubsfan5150
Posted on 9/18/17 at 10:51 am to cubsfan5150
quote:32, without question.
64? Maybe... 32, probably not.
Also, LOL at "maybe" to 64. Too funny
This post was edited on 9/18/17 at 10:52 am
Posted on 9/18/17 at 10:52 am to shel311
Are you talking about the 32 starters or 32 best QBs in the league? Some teams have a backup that would be better than some teams starters. Jimmy G in New England for instance is better than Josh McCown.
Posted on 9/18/17 at 10:53 am to StrongBackWeakMind
All things considered? Yes, of course.
You need a starter for one season, maybe two if you draft a rookie.
Your team is bad, you know it, so you go cheap.
You need a starter for one season, maybe two if you draft a rookie.
Your team is bad, you know it, so you go cheap.
Posted on 9/18/17 at 10:54 am to td01241
quote:
Are you talking about the 32 starters or 32 best QBs in the league? Some teams have a backup that would be better than some teams starters. Jimmy G in New England for instance is better than Josh McCown.
quote:
He is very very obviously 1 of the best 32 QBs in the league.
Posted on 9/18/17 at 10:54 am to td01241
Bingo
Cincinnati's backup is highly thought of too
Cincinnati's backup is highly thought of too
Posted on 9/18/17 at 10:55 am to StrongBackWeakMind
quote:
Looked good in his first game.
Haven't watched the Ravens game yet, but doesn't look good.
And?
Are you saying the Browns should bench their rookie QB they believe is their future because he had a bad game in his second career start against a good defense?
I don't know if Kizer is the answer or not, but if that's what you're arguing, it's retarded.
Posted on 9/18/17 at 10:56 am to shel311
Post the numbers that support your claim. Otherwise you're throwing shite at the wall and hoping it sticks.
Posted on 9/18/17 at 10:56 am to cubsfan5150
No owner wants to put up with the crap that will come with him. If he was really good, they'd have signed him but to take him will piss off a large percentage of any fanbase. Not to mention his stupid girlfriend all over social media bitching for him. Why put up with all of that?
Posted on 9/18/17 at 10:57 am to cubsfan5150
If AJ were that highly thought of, I doubt his teammates would be pushing to sign Kaep instead of playing him.
That being said, I just want the shite show to end and a horrible showing in Cincy should be the end of this.
That being said, I just want the shite show to end and a horrible showing in Cincy should be the end of this.
Posted on 9/18/17 at 10:58 am to cubsfan5150
quote:Oof. I disagree, to say the least.
All things considered? Yes, of course.
Posted on 9/18/17 at 10:58 am to StrongBackWeakMind
quote:
Was there supposed to be a point attached to this post? Or were you using yards/game as the defining factor in a Dalton vs Kaep debate?
Being that there's so much NFL qb knowledge in this thread I assumed they already knew Dalton took the Bengals to the playoffs for 5 consecutive years from 2011-2015. They averaged 10 wins a season during that team. I'm sure you already knew that though.
What they may not know is the guy you are advocating for to replace him has, on average, thrown for 61 less yards per game. Meanwhile the 49ers were 8-8 in '13, 5-11 in '14, and as previously mentioned 1-10 in his eleven starts in '16.
Posted on 9/18/17 at 10:58 am to double d
Cincy may consider it if the alternative is losing the locker room and having a lame duck season.
Posted on 9/18/17 at 10:58 am to RedRifle
Might as well give it a try. The Bengals offensive line can't protect Dalton. Maybe a more mobile QB will be more effective.
My understanding is that Kaep runs a very specific offense but the Bengals have very little to lose with how things are going.
My understanding is that Kaep runs a very specific offense but the Bengals have very little to lose with how things are going.
Posted on 9/18/17 at 10:59 am to lsuguy84
quote:Are you insinuating that 32 NFL QBs have better numbers than Kaep?
Post the numbers that support your claim. Otherwise you're throwing shite at the wall and hoping it sticks.
Man, that's rich.
I'll give you 2...90+ QB rating last season and 4:1 TD INT ratio. What else would you like?
This post was edited on 9/18/17 at 11:00 am
Posted on 9/18/17 at 10:59 am to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
And?
Are you saying the Browns should bench their rookie QB they believe is their future because he had a bad game in his second career start against a good defense?
I don't know if Kizer is the answer or not, but if that's what you're arguing, it's retarded.
I was commenting on Kizer. Nothing to do with Kaep.
Bring your blood pressure down.
Posted on 9/18/17 at 11:03 am to shel311
They really are almost identical, but Dalton gives you considerably more y/g passing. Seems worthless to bring him in.
Try AJ

Try AJ

This post was edited on 9/18/17 at 11:03 am
Posted on 9/18/17 at 11:04 am to shel311
Well I apologize. There were 25 QB's with a higher completion percentage last year. He was better than Osweiller, Bortles, Fitzpatrick and Newton in that regard.
Posted on 9/18/17 at 11:04 am to teke184
Do people really still think the only reason he's not on team is because of talent? Do you really think with that amount of teams with shitty qb play that no one would take a chance on a guy that helped bring a team to a super bowl?
It's pretty clear this is about 3 issues: trying not to piss off your fanbase, avoiding a media circus, and questions about whether or not Kap would be fully focused on football.
If he never did this protest there's no doubt he'd be on a team right now.
It's pretty clear this is about 3 issues: trying not to piss off your fanbase, avoiding a media circus, and questions about whether or not Kap would be fully focused on football.
If he never did this protest there's no doubt he'd be on a team right now.
Posted on 9/18/17 at 11:06 am to lsupride87
quote:In fairness, Dalton is also 1 of the best 32 QBs in the NFL.
They really are almost identical, but Dalton gives you considerably more y/g passing. Seems worthless to bring him in.
Try AJ
I'll take YPA over passing yards per game, personally though. But yes, they are similar from a career standpoint. Dalton had 1 great year, and he had an absurd Oline where he was never touched and took advantage of that. If you factor in Oline play and give each an Oline that isn't that dominant, I'd absolutely take Kaep over Dalton.
Posted on 9/18/17 at 11:07 am to lsuguy84
quote:That strengthens my argument.
There were 25 QB's with a higher completion percentage last year. He was better than Osweiller, Bortles, Fitzpatrick and Newton in that regard.
Popular
Back to top


1






