Started By
Message

re: Barry Bonds sure has lost some weight from his playing days

Posted on 1/28/11 at 1:31 pm to
Posted by SCUBABlake
RIP WT6
Member since Jan 2008
40338 posts
Posted on 1/28/11 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

if setroids improve performance, why did they not improve the performance of these guys? If the consensus about steriods is correct, there should be no such thing as a guy who used and wasn't worth a damn.


huh? so you're saying that steroids should automatically bring a middle-of-the-pack player to elite status? that existing talent doesn't matter?

quote:

I'm still waiting for someone to explain why Roger Maris could hit 61 with out steroids, but other guys could not.


bigger ballparks?

ETA: I was confused on the first part. I thought you were coming from the other side of the fence. My b.
This post was edited on 1/28/11 at 1:33 pm
Posted by barry
Location, Location, Location
Member since Aug 2006
51397 posts
Posted on 1/28/11 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

if setroids improve performance, why did they not improve the performance of these guys? If the consensus about steriods is correct, there should be no such thing as a guy who used and wasn't worth a damn.


Baseball is such a weird sport. The smallest things can be the difference between great seasons and bad seasons. They won't make anyone great, it still takes hard work and talent. But all else equal, the person on steroids will blow the other person out of the water. These other guys were probably shitty and had shitty work ethic so it didn't make a difference, or maybe they were already strong and they just had shitty swings so steroids really didn't help them.
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
61010 posts
Posted on 1/28/11 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

Confirmed steroid players had career years far beyond anything they ever had while on steroids. I'm not sure what more proof you need.


so no players ever had extrem outlier seasons before PED? Not to sound like a broken record, but a guy who never hit 40, hit 61 in 1961, long before PED.

quote:

it shows how Bonds bat speed increased in his late 30's, that just doesn't happen, its physically impossible unless you use PED's.


if it can not physically happen, then there should be a study that confirms it. That its rare is not proof. bonds posses rare skill. I link a pod cast on page 1, the guy interviewed claims studies do not show steroids improve performance for baseball. I can't find his paper thought, i think it might be a pay article.
Posted by barry
Location, Location, Location
Member since Aug 2006
51397 posts
Posted on 1/28/11 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

so no players ever had extrem outlier seasons before PED? Not to sound like a broken record, but a guy who never hit 40, hit 61 in 1961, long before PED.


No it can happen, but its was happening with steroid players, the simplest explanation tends to be true. Steroids were around and used by people way before 1961.

quote:

That its rare


Its not rare, its undocumented in the history of man that a person reverses aging. All you people are so laughable that you think steroids didn't have an effect on players. HR numbers just magically went up and they have recently just "magically" gone down with players hitting in the SAME ball parks.
This post was edited on 1/28/11 at 1:39 pm
Posted by SCUBABlake
RIP WT6
Member since Jan 2008
40338 posts
Posted on 1/28/11 at 1:44 pm to
I do believe steroids impacted home runs. You would be foolish not to think such.

But I'm saying the talent level must be there in order for it to have any kind of impact.
Posted by TigerNlc
Chocolate City
Member since Jun 2006
33194 posts
Posted on 1/28/11 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

I'm not questioning why everyone is picking on him. I'm just saying the average person is uninformed when it comes to the situation, they just act like Bonds is the only person to do it and have no knowledge of the upper echelon talent that he possessed.

He was a good player no doubt but IHO he cheated. Plain and simple. He wouldn't have taken them if they didn't improve an aspect of his performance. Even if it was longevity his stats wouldn't be the same. I know others did it but that doesn't make it right and we shouldn't base our character on someone elses actions. I really hope they never let him in or anyone who refused to cooperate or tell the truth.
This post was edited on 1/28/11 at 1:52 pm
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
61010 posts
Posted on 1/28/11 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

He wouldn't have taken them if they didn't improve an aspect of his performance




That's a pretty ridiculous statement
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45219 posts
Posted on 1/28/11 at 1:55 pm to
Where's your objective proof of increased bat speed?

You know, an actual measurement of his bat speed...
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
61010 posts
Posted on 1/28/11 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

Its not rare, its undocumented in the history of man that a person reverses aging


I didn't say anything about aging, I was talking about bat speed. lots of things were never done before they were done. If Bonds bat speed improved that fact does not prove anything.

quote:

All you people are so laughable that you think steroids didn't have an effect on players. HR numbers just magically went up and they have recently just "magically" gone down with players hitting in the SAME ball parks.


listen to the podcast i posted and refute it with something other than anecdotal evidence.

As far as the numbers going down, Bonds, McGwire and Sosa are no longer playing. Maybe the new guys aren't as good at hitting HR's. The ball parks are not the only factor, are they calling more strikes? Did pitchers maybe get better? There are lots of possible explainations, but we don;t want to ruin a good story now do we.

Posted by NawlinsTiger9
Where the mongooses roam
Member since Jan 2009
39622 posts
Posted on 1/28/11 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

I've heard that setroids do not in fact increase fast muscle twitch. It builds bulk, bulk should decrease, not increase bat speed


Not claiming to know much about the topic, but isn't track & field the ground zero of doping? It seems like America's best sprinters have been surrounded with the steroid/PED controversy.

Knowing that sprinters take them, it seems like some drugs could have something to do with speed, right?
Posted by barry
Location, Location, Location
Member since Aug 2006
51397 posts
Posted on 1/28/11 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

Where's your objective proof of increased bat speed?

You know, an actual measurement of his bat speed...



LINK


You say that like measuring bat speed is some sort of great feat of science.
Posted by barry
Location, Location, Location
Member since Aug 2006
51397 posts
Posted on 1/28/11 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

As far as the numbers going down, Bonds, McGwire and Sosa are no longer playing. Maybe the new guys aren't as good at hitting HR's. The ball parks are not the only factor, are they calling more strikes? Did pitchers maybe get better? There are lots of possible explainations, but we don;t want to ruin a good story now do we.


So its much more believable that offesnsive numbers are down because of crappier players, umpires, better pitchers, etc etc or than the fact that steroids is now tested for and punished. Right.......
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
290855 posts
Posted on 1/28/11 at 2:20 pm to
steroids make you stronger, the bat is going to feel lighter in your hands, thus you are going to swing it a lot quicker. It doesnt really take science to figure that out


Posted by The Yetty
Member since Feb 2005
12542 posts
Posted on 1/28/11 at 2:25 pm to
I'm not defending Barry, but I've lost about 35 pounds after I finished my collegiate playing days. Have you seen Teddy Bruschi on NFL Live lately?
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
61010 posts
Posted on 1/28/11 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

Not claiming to know much about the topic, but isn't track & field the ground zero of doping? It seems like America's best sprinters have been surrounded with the steroid/PED controversy.

Knowing that sprinters take them, it seems like some drugs could have something to do with speed, right?


then it should be easy to prove with actual studies and real evidence, not just, well so and so used and he hit a bunch of HR, there fore steroids make you hit more HR's.
Posted by barry
Location, Location, Location
Member since Aug 2006
51397 posts
Posted on 1/28/11 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

I'm not defending Barry, but I've lost about 35 pounds after I finished my collegiate playing days. Have you seen Teddy Bruschi on NFL Live lately?


Yea just ignore the OP, its a stupid comment.
Posted by rondo
Worst. Poster. Evar.
Member since Jan 2004
77515 posts
Posted on 1/28/11 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

Lester Earl


you're needed in da rw3r thread
This post was edited on 1/28/11 at 2:27 pm
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
61010 posts
Posted on 1/28/11 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

but I've lost about 35 pounds after I finished my collegiate playing days. Have you seen Teddy Bruschi on NFL Live lately?


What does that have to do with steriods? I would imagine Bruschi doesn't work out like he used to, probably has a different diet
Posted by barry
Location, Location, Location
Member since Aug 2006
51397 posts
Posted on 1/28/11 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

then it should be easy to prove with actual studies and real evidence


The fricking drugs are called PED's, PERFORMANCE ENHANCING DRUGS. I don't need a study to tell me fricking cheese makes everything better. Its just that bleeping obvious.
Posted by The Yetty
Member since Feb 2005
12542 posts
Posted on 1/28/11 at 2:28 pm to
That's my point.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram