Started By
Message

re: Athletic story on the Aikman/Buck drama

Posted on 10/30/26 at 11:14 am to
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
42389 posts
Posted on 10/30/26 at 11:14 am to
If you just synched the home teams radio broadcast over the video, the ratings for MNF wouldn't fluctuate +/- 3%.
Posted by supatigah
CEO of the Keith Hernandez Fan Club
Member since Mar 2004
90732 posts
Posted on 10/30/26 at 11:16 am to
quote:

I still can't believe what these networks pay for this talent.

Nobody watches these games because of who is in the booth. Fifteen mil + for Buck's new contract.

You could find someone to do it for 1/10th of that.


you dont overpay for the broadcast to be good

you overpay for the guarantee that the broadcast will not be bad

because a bad broadcast becomes a viral story and delegitimizes the product you paid a premium for the rights to broadcast

plus a bad production brings the League to your door wanting answers
Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
81846 posts
Posted on 10/30/26 at 11:19 am to
They're not going to be replacing Aikman with a 28 yr old talking in his second language. They'll probably just hire Greg Olsen and it'll be fine.
Posted by Tifway419
Member since Sep 2022
2603 posts
Posted on 10/30/26 at 11:34 am to
I’m still trying to figure out who’s side I’m on.

But then again, IDGAF
Posted by Trojan15
Ville Platte
Member since Oct 2006
485 posts
Posted on 10/30/26 at 11:35 am to
for me the voice of some of the announcers is off putting. I dont care for olsen or jj watt. I don't need football knowledge, i just want to listen to a voice that is not annoying.
Posted by crimsonsaint
Member since Nov 2009
38037 posts
Posted on 10/30/26 at 11:52 am to
quote:

I don't care about multi millionaires cat fighting.


Yeah don’t even care.
Posted by mattz1122
Member since Oct 2007
57299 posts
Posted on 10/30/26 at 12:05 pm to
I have no faith ESPN hires Olsen.

The hiring of Buck and Aikman was less about increasing viewership and more about the network signaling its commitment to the NFL after a decade of CTE reporting and the increasingly shittier MNF game scheduling as a consequence.
Posted by CatfishJohn
Member since Jun 2020
23733 posts
Posted on 10/30/26 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

I don't watch a game for who is in the booth, but it can sure ruin a game listening to some of these broadcast teams.



Was about to post the same.

I don't watch for them, but I'll sure as shite stop watching because of them.
Posted by spaghettioeauxs
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2017
3297 posts
Posted on 10/30/26 at 12:17 pm to
Yep, watch a game with a bad female play by play announcer and see how fast you either mute it or turn it off altogether.
Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
81846 posts
Posted on 10/30/26 at 12:23 pm to
quote:


I have no faith ESPN hires Olsen.

I'd imagine Olsen wants to be back on a #1 team. Even if it's not him I doubt they would push Aikman out without an ace in the hole.
quote:

The hiring of Buck and Aikman was less about increasing viewership and more about the network signaling its commitment to the NFL after a decade of CTE reporting and the increasingly shittier MNF game scheduling as a consequence.

Yeah and they're even more committed now since the NFL owns a portion of ESPN.
Posted by Hamma1122
Member since Sep 2016
22836 posts
Posted on 10/30/26 at 12:35 pm to
Olsen on MNF would be good
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram