- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Amite kicked out of the playoffs due to fight
Posted on 12/2/15 at 10:50 am to JJ27
Posted on 12/2/15 at 10:50 am to JJ27
quote:
Except he gave Byrd a pass after they appealed and let them back into the playoffs.
The Byrd issue has nothing to do with this situation. It was actually a good reversal by the LHSAA for what amounts to a class scheduling issue.
Posted on 12/2/15 at 10:51 am to JJ27
You're talking about something completely different. I was talking about the director being fair in applying rules. He suspended Byrd and the Executive Committee overturned him. So what you said affirms my argument.
Posted on 12/2/15 at 11:00 am to thatguy777
Fair enough. If the executive board can overturn him, how much power does he actually have to change the culture of the LHSAA? What did they want the kids to do? Stand there and watch Bogalusa start a fight, clear the bench, and beat down their friends? Bogalusa started it correct? Someone said there's no video evidence. Is this a case of the LHSAA following the NCAA example of being harder on teams that don't cooperate?
Posted on 12/2/15 at 11:03 am to JJ27
there has to be video, but the LHSAA has no subpoena power...
Posted on 12/2/15 at 11:05 am to JJ27
quote:
Someone said there's no video evidence
There is plenty of video evidence. Amite's game film "magically" didn't record the fight.
quote:
What did they want the kids to do?
Follow the rules.
Posted on 12/2/15 at 11:06 am to chalmetteowl
Fambrough just tweeted that suit is filed. Judge Bill Morvant was assigned case.
Posted on 12/2/15 at 11:08 am to chalmetteowl
quote:
there has to be video,
Not necessarily from the schools. WM and Ouachita got into a bench clearing brawl in 95 and the video mysteriously came up missing. Ouachita started it by their sideline, and every single one of us left the bench to go get our guys. No suspensions for anyone, just a warning that if it happened again we would be out of the playoffs. Happened in week 8 of the regular season I believe.
Posted on 12/2/15 at 11:09 am to rmc
quote:
Judge Bill Morvant was assigned case.
Not good for Amite
Posted on 12/2/15 at 11:11 am to JJ27
quote:
Not necessarily from the schools.
Are you really going to believe that a HS football program doesn't record every game for film study?
ETA: I just checked. Amite has a hudl account specifically for management of football game film.
This post was edited on 12/2/15 at 11:14 am
Posted on 12/2/15 at 11:13 am to Antonio Moss
I don't think it's necessarily bad for Amite. I guess it just depends on what Tangi has to show him. I don't know enough to say but I think most judges are gonna let the kids play unless the facts are so slanted against the team.
Posted on 12/2/15 at 11:13 am to Antonio Moss
quote:
Are you really going to believe that a HS football program doesn't record every game for film study?
No doubt. The film guy for both teams most likely filmed the whole thing. They just deleted them.
Posted on 12/2/15 at 11:14 am to Antonio Moss
quote:
Are you really going to believe that a HS football program doesn't record every game for film study?
That's not what I said at all. I said the schools didn't necessarily cooperate and the film of the fight might have mysteriously disappeared
Posted on 12/2/15 at 11:14 am to Antonio Moss
game film operators generally shut down between plays - hence no official game film of fight... just like last year when a top LSU recruit was suspended then unssuspended.
Posted on 12/2/15 at 11:16 am to rmc
quote:
I don't think it's necessarily bad for Amite.
I guarantee you they wanted Fields or Clark.
Posted on 12/2/15 at 11:17 am to choupiquesushi
quote:
game film operators generally shut down between plays - hence no official game film of fight... just like last year when a top LSU recruit was suspended then unssuspended.
They can but they don't have too. If the fight started during a play I doubt the film guy just stopped filming. Its possible but doubtful.
Posted on 12/2/15 at 11:17 am to Antonio Moss
Well I wasn't going to say that but I agree. Lol.
Posted on 12/2/15 at 11:22 am to chalmetteowl
the game was at Amite, right?
because when games are filmed from a home press box, you can't really tell who on the visiting team entered the field because it's so far away. you know they entered it but the numbers are hard to read from that distance
because when games are filmed from a home press box, you can't really tell who on the visiting team entered the field because it's so far away. you know they entered it but the numbers are hard to read from that distance
This post was edited on 12/2/15 at 11:26 am
Posted on 12/2/15 at 12:16 pm to ToulatownTiger
quote:
There were many other clearly broken rules that were not enforced in the past couple years and this year. Why change that this time?
And I don't give a rats arse about Amite
different sheriff in town now.. kemosabe
Posted on 12/2/15 at 12:54 pm to choupiquesushi
maybe it's just me but there should be additional penalties for schools that file suits against the LHSAA and lose... what they're doing is trying to circumvent the LHSAA process
Posted on 12/2/15 at 1:12 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
maybe it's just me but there should be additional penalties for schools that file suits against the LHSAA and lose... what they're doing is trying to circumvent the LHSAA process
Nah. Even though they're in the wrong here, you don't want to punish people for trying to hold people accountable, especially semipublic entities like the LHSAA.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News