Started By
Message

re: 1 of the 4 women still suing Watson has now filed a suit against the Houston Texans

Posted on 6/27/22 at 2:51 pm to
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112918 posts
Posted on 6/27/22 at 2:51 pm to
quote:

You don’t find it coincidental that there are like 60 women with the same story & only 24 decided to sue?

So you're saying there are actually 60 women, and not a single one reported to the police immediately after?
quote:

You rolling with the 60 women made up a story?

I'm rolling with neither side, not making any assumption that either is 100% true, that's my point.

Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
39349 posts
Posted on 6/27/22 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

The timing of it all almost guarantees that this is what happened. The Texans were keeping all this quiet while Watson was playing for them.


You have the timeframe completely messed up. He asked for the trade, and the Texans were listening to offers when this popped up. Why would Houston do this knowing it would lower his value and complicate a trade?

You're the one with the messed up timeframe. All this came out AFTER the Texans tried to trade him and couldn't get what they wanted.

quote:

Personally, I hope this blows up and McNair has to sell the team and takes Easterby with him.
Agree.

quote:

However, they are stating that the Texans should be held liable for what Watson did, which seems like a stretch to me.
The Texans were fully aware of what was going on and in fact enabled it and covered it up...until such time that Watson refused to play for them anymore. Rather odd, and coincidental timing wouldn't you say?

Yes, the Texans should be held liable.
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
39349 posts
Posted on 6/27/22 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

You don't find it at all strange or coincidental that of all 24 girls, exactly 0 of them went to the police to report the rape and all 24 "randomly" ended up with the same 1 lawyer, who is a known sleazy lawyer in the Houston area?


That, plus the timing of it all. None of this came out until AFTER Watson refused to play for Texans and the Texans subsequently could not trade him for what they wanted in return.

How difficult would it have been for a sleazy organization like the Texans to contact a sleazy Houston area lawyer to set this whole thing up to make sure if Watson doesn't play for the Texans, he doesn't play at all?
Posted by Righteous Dude
Member since Oct 2017
1550 posts
Posted on 6/27/22 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

Watson had, "humped the table" and "left a wet spot."




Posted by CovingtonTigre
In your head Werder
Member since Mar 2021
1482 posts
Posted on 6/27/22 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

I'm rolling with neither side, not making any assumption that either is 100% true, that's my point.


Shel,

I experienced your point as significantly biased & not neutral
Posted by WuShock
Metairie
Member since Aug 2018
1403 posts
Posted on 6/27/22 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

You're the one with the messed up timeframe. All this came out AFTER the Texans tried to trade him and couldn't get what they wanted.

He asked for a trade in January 2021, and this came up in early March 2021. I don’t think any deal would have been decided on until closer to April. The fact teams still offered three firsts for him tells me that they wouldn’t have had issues getting what they wanted. There is zero reason for them to set this up at the time it was set up. Why not wait another month and trade him first? It’s dumb to lower the value of a player you’re going to have to trade.
quote:

The Texans were fully aware of what was going on and in fact enabled it and covered it up.

At what level and what would they not be able to argue in a way that I already mentioned?
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112918 posts
Posted on 6/27/22 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

Shel,

I experienced your point as significantly biased & not neutral
That's on you for taking what I said and making inferences instead of taking what I said for what I said.

I never took a side, I question anyone who is making assumptions and being fairly certain on either side of this discussion.

Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
33523 posts
Posted on 6/27/22 at 4:08 pm to
Dude is a dog. No shame, literally coming from jumping a table
Posted by SPEEDY
2005 Tiger Smack Poster of the Year
Member since Dec 2003
88204 posts
Posted on 6/27/22 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

Watson had, "humped the table" and "left a wet spot."


Posted by mdomingue
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2010
47686 posts
Posted on 6/27/22 at 5:50 pm to
quote:

since the Texans are ultimately at fault, IMO.


What BS. Watson is ultimately responsible, the Texans have culpability if they allowed it to continue without any consequences for Watson.

quote:

If the accusations are contrived


Yeah, I don't think they all are, though I suspect some are at least overblown.

quote:

it's almost certain that Texans ownership were the creators - in response to Watson refusing to play for them and the Texans subsequently not being able to trade him for what they wanted in return. Basically, the Texans saying, "if you won't play for us, we'll make sure you don't play at all."



Very doubtful.

Posted by Dixie Normus
Earth
Member since Sep 2013
2875 posts
Posted on 6/28/22 at 8:08 am to
quote:

You rolling with the 60 women made up a story?


I’m rolling with the over 20 complaints heard by a grand jury we’re ultimately found to not even have probable cause to prosecute. Grand jury presentations are not constrained by normal rules of evidence. Every one of these that has been seen by a grand jury couldn’t even meet the lowest legal threshold out there to justify a prosecution.

If he did it, he needs to be in jail. Sexual assault is abhorrent. However, the proof is severely lacking at this point. It’s warranted extreme caution when looking at the allegations of the petitions.
Posted by Glorious
Mobile
Member since Aug 2014
26348 posts
Posted on 6/28/22 at 8:09 am to
I don’t understand this rumored one year suspension the NFL is gonna bring down. Do you think he sexually assaulted 20+ women or not?
Posted by JodyPlauche
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2009
9925 posts
Posted on 6/28/22 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

You don't find it at all strange or coincidental that of all 24 girls,


Not at all!
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram