Started By
Message

re: Thematic Investing Master Thread

Posted on 7/20/26 at 11:47 am to
Posted by iPad
Find Me At An Apple Store Near You
Member since Nov 2025
1527 posts
Posted on 7/20/26 at 11:47 am to
Thanks for posting this
Posted by bayoubengals88
LA
Member since Sep 2007
26206 posts
Posted on 7/20/26 at 11:55 am to
quote:

Thanks for posting this

It's a lot, but it also ain't going anywhere. I'll use it as a reference.
Hope you enjoy

The way I look at it, what I'm really interested in is OUST, FLY, and ELVA. With the inclusion of NBIS, that's four sectors.

If money grows I'll be looking to get into QNT and FORM for quantum exposure. FORM being the cyrogenics cooling play for the sector.

Additionally, I really like having some metals exposure, but currently don't have the money for it.

Posted by Omada
Hoist the black flag, slit throats
Member since Jun 2015
765 posts
Posted on 7/20/26 at 2:11 pm to
What you added is very similar to what is in the next post. All it says is how scores are meant to be read, not how they are calculated. As is, no one can tell if the listed scores are correctly calculated, if the calculations actually use the variables that are claimed to be used, if the calculations actually make sense and work as intended, or if the scoring system actually has any predictive value by backtesting it. For all your readers know, the scoring system is actually the percentage of employees that are at least an OT 6 multiplied by a randomly generated number for the CEO's star sign.

I haven't read the vast majority of what you've posted in the thread due to the sheer enormity of it, but I came away thinking it was overwhelmingly the work of LLMs after skimming. I know you stated that at the very beginning, but you may want to make it clear to your readers that LLMs make lots of mistakes. It took Gemini a dozen attempts or more just to create a proper opening range indicator for thinkorswim for me, and it constantly said the new code was the foolproof method or it would definitely work, for example. They also have a tendency to suck up to the user, to put it bluntly, which can lead to errors.

Edit: not trying to crap all over your work, just trying to help.
This post was edited on 7/20/26 at 2:13 pm
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
34020 posts
Posted on 7/20/26 at 3:18 pm to
The Lord has heard my prayers

DJT just signed a new EO to significantly restrict defense contractors from using Chinese critical minerals

LINK
Critical minerals new thray
This post was edited on 7/20/26 at 3:30 pm
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
51290 posts
Posted on 7/21/26 at 11:04 am to
I do think that DOCN deserves a place in your cloud/memory theme. Their growth is accelerating (they just preannounced earnings) and their biggest impediment (debt) is being addressed by non dilutive means.

and they just announced today a 30% price increase
Posted by bayoubengals88
LA
Member since Sep 2007
26206 posts
Posted on 7/21/26 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

Edit: not trying to crap all over your work, just trying to help.

No problem my friend. And yes, of course it's AI generated. I just did the prompting.

The risk reward is simply based on cash balance and backlog vs. current market penetration against future TAM opportunities.

This entire thread is an index of ideas that may pique interests in individual names. You can then take those names and do more research on the single equity. By no means is this comprehensive. It's an inch deep and a mile wide.

On the other hand, the NBIS and OUST threads are a mile deep.
Posted by cadillacattack
the ATL
Member since May 2020
11550 posts
Posted on 7/29/26 at 12:11 pm to
looks like ONDS may sustain a break below the 250 Bar support level ($7.65) ... its currently at $7.20 and mildly declining .... mebbe an opportunity soon?
Posted by bayoubengals88
LA
Member since Sep 2007
26206 posts
Posted on 7/29/26 at 7:48 pm to
There are many opportunities right now

If I had cash and wanted to pick a less crowded name, I’d go for ONTO at these levels.

ONDS just doesn’t move to my liking, even in a good market.
Posted by cadillacattack
the ATL
Member since May 2020
11550 posts
Posted on 7/30/26 at 5:47 am to
Same here. I was active on ondas a couple years ago, mainly because of their Seimens AG partnership…..but currently focused on less speculative opportunities.

Posted by LChama
Member since May 2020
4518 posts
Posted on 9/19/26 at 6:46 pm to
Interesting since this thread… som yuge winners and a lot of opportunities

Ticker % Gain/Loss
1 TEAM +105.83%
2 NLST +92.19%
3 LHX +89.14%
4 SMCI +61.66%
5 SWKS +49.55%
6 SMTC +48.05%
7 NRGV +45.78%
8 INFQ +45.54%
9 ZETA +39.42%
10 IREN +38.85%
11 VOYG +38.49%
12 PPTA +37.51%
13 QRVO +37.05%
14 SATL +33.77%
15 MRVL +29.45%
16 ATKR +28.47%
17 LITE +27.03%
18 RDW +27.10%
19 NBIS +25.79%
20 ASAN +23.67%
21 BE +23.57%
22 PSTG +20.78%
23 COHR +14.32%
24 DIGI +12.84%
25 COHU +12.82%
26 LTRX +12.72%
27 FORM +12.13%
28 CRWV +11.13%
29 CLS +10.38%
30 APLD +9.03%
31 STX +9.03%
32 FLY +8.82%
33 MNDY +8.19%
34 SMR +7.12%
35 SLDP +6.93%
36 VSAT +6.86%
37 AUR +6.12%
38 POET +5.55%
39 TRMB +5.46%
40 IESC +5.11%
41 MRAM +5.02%
42 LMT +4.84%
43 SONY +4.81%
44 GSAT +4.62%
45 MP +4.47%
46 CIFR +4.44%
47 MTSI +3.18%
48 LUNR +3.11%
49 AAOI +2.70%
50 CAMT +2.03%
51 NVT +1.91%
52 UUUU +1.83%
53 SATS/ECHO +1.59%
54 PWR +1.30%
55 ASTS +1.25%
56 PLAB +0.90%
57 IRDM +0.19%
58 ALAB -0.12%
59 NVTS -0.26%
60 BLZE -0.45%
61 MDA -0.56%
62 IONQ -1.63%
63 NNE -1.87%
64 FCEL -2.11%
65 BKSY -2.34%
66 EOSE -4.12%
67 NNDM -4.32%
68 RKLB -4.51%
69 SOUN -5.26%
70 KTOS -5.18%
71 QCOM -3.37%
72 LAC -3.05%
73 GNRC -3.48%
74 PLUG -3.69%
75 ROK -3.91%
76 CGNX -3.92%
77 PTC -3.02%
78 AMBA -7.59%
79 INOD -6.03%
80 CIEN -6.84%
81 LEU -6.93%
82 VICR -6.27%
83 VIAV -7.34%
84 NTCT -7.48%
85 WDC -7.51%
86 MKSI -7.54%
87 FSLR -7.56%
88 OKLO -7.56%
89 AEIS -7.69%
90 HLIT -7.73%
91 LOAR -7.94%
92 ADEA -8.28%
93 HUBB -8.54%
94 AMSC -8.60%
95 LSCC -9.19%
96 AZZ -9.84%
97 CALX -9.96%
98 PRIM -10.27%
99 CRNC -10.43%
100 LTBR -10.44%
101 MRCY -11.24%
102 GILT -11.85%
103 AEVA -12.05%
104 CEVA -12.68%
105 RGTI -13.00%
106 CRDO -13.22%
107 BWXT -13.82%
108 VRT -13.88%
109 TRT -14.41%
110 KLIC -14.48%
111 ARQQ -15.06%
112 OUST -16.05%
113 FLUX -16.67%
114 MOD -17.71%
115 HLIO -18.03%
116 AVAV -18.41%
117 FN -18.78%
118 SERV -18.86%
119 INTT -19.64%
120 ONDS -19.73%
121 ACLS -19.85%
122 POWI -28.54%
123 POWI -28.54%
124 SHLS -26.21%
125 EXTR -26.47%
126 ALGM -26.64%
127 PL -26.92%
128 OSS -28.29%
129 DY -28.33%
130 TE -28.60%
131 MVST -28.89%
132 AGX -29.28%
133 QBTS -29.40%
134 MVIS -29.81%
135 ELVA -30.27%
136 AAON -31.11%
137 ARRY -33.55%
138 LAES -34.92%
139 MTZ -34.95%
140 ENVX -36.65%
141 ADTN -38.20%
142 VPG -39.69%
143 FLNC -47.97%
144 AMPG -48.80%
145 LAZR -85.71%
— THR N/A
— CSGS N/A
— QNT N/A
Posted by bayoubengals88
LA
Member since Sep 2007
26206 posts
Posted on 9/20/26 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

Interesting since this thread… som yuge winners and a lot of opportunities
Honestly pretty surprising given the timing
Posted by lsuconnman
Baton rouge
Member since Feb 2007
5708 posts
Posted on 9/20/26 at 5:16 pm to
quote:

Interesting since this thread… som yuge winners and a lot of opportunities


2/3 are underwater. Motley Fool, SA, and Reddit have provided that level of performance for a decade. I think the only thing new is an LLM is repackages the info as its own the provides it in a single convenient location.
Posted by bayoubengals88
LA
Member since Sep 2007
26206 posts
Posted on 9/20/26 at 6:10 pm to
-1.33 % total.

I disagreed with many of the stocks mentioned, but I also had never heard of TEAM…so…
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
51290 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 1:18 pm to
e-commerce could be changing forever
earlier, AMZN banned METAs muse agent from accessing its platform when it discovered muse agents were browsing and selecting items autonomously

quote:

Amazon has blocked Meta's new AI shopping agent, Muse, from its platform, citing violations of its Conditions of Use. This move follows Amazon's previous legal struggles against similar AI agents, prompting a new strategy: directly enforcing customer agreement terms. Amazon alleges Muse operates without proper identification and captures login data, claims Meta refutes. The e-commerce giant, which successfully deploys its own Alexa for Shopping AI, aims to maintain control over the customer journey and checkout process. This dispute underscores a growing battle for platform dominance in the AI agent era, where companies like Amazon and Meta, who also restrict third-party agents on their platforms, are asserting ownership over customer interactions and transactions.


On the other side of the web we have this announcement

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


$SHOP shares up 5% on the news

So on the one hand we have Amazon attempting to wall off its platform and Shopify deciding to meet its customers where they already are
Posted by bayoubengals88
LA
Member since Sep 2007
26206 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 1:32 pm to
Both are Nebius customers
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
51290 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 1:47 pm to
the online shopping experience becoming agentic could be a powerful uplift for quite a few businesses NBIS in particular
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram