re: Spec Play - HGRAF

quote:

---

My overriding point is - you know who is acting like the Hyperion process is still risky? HGRAF is.

---

Concise. Well done. A skill I wish I had.

I do believe we will hit $10 before we list on the Nasdaq even if this company never makes a dime.
It’s risky to buy and it’s risky to sell.

Definitely need more sunshine pumped in here.

Got you, fam.

I am extremely happy with a strong close to the week, especially during such a couple of bloody days in the market. I would have been very concerned if we dipped below $5 as that could jeopardize the uplisting. But today showed a lot of strength and gives me much confidence we’ll stay above $5 (if not well above $5) for the foreseeable future.

In reading between the lines in recent interviews, I also think HG has chosen to intentionally stagger news every couple of weeks during the uplisting process to keep momentum smooth and positive.

Yes we’re all aware we have to actually produce and sell graphene now. These aren’t new concerns. It just means we’re finally getting past some of the other issues where we can even start talking about producing and selling graphene.

Great problem to have. I remain very bullish

I don’t anything to add to this fine discussion other than a .

It’s been a good week here in the HGRAF thread.

Finding a project manager, ops manager, and start up manager in the Austin and/or greater Houston area is not in my top 10 concerns. I get its yours, that's fine, but given the current situation it's down the ladder for.me.

I just don’t understand the negativity but again I am not a day trader, so I guess it goes with the territory in order to be successful at that.

I will say that even if this company never make a dime of profit the IP and patents are worth over $10 a share at a minimum so I still don’t understand the hesitation because this company would be acquired at a minimum

quote:

---

Go to their website and read the Bios of their BoD and Executive team. Most Execs have been involved with start ups and product development at some level or come from a scientific/industrial background.

---

I did that. And then I researched each element of their bios, meaning how did the company do under their leadership.

And to be clear about something - my contribution to this thread seems to be perceived by some as overly negative, but that isn’t the intent. The exchange you and I have had (along with a few others) is actually pretty normal and healthy discussion for a thread like this.

I’m a believer in HGRAF. I own 10K shares and made that investment based largely on the information and ideas that have been shared here. This thread is a resource.

I’ve also been involved in a few ventures similar to what HGRAF is attempting - early-stage commercialization/business development, once within a business unit of a large conglomerate, once for a company that for two years was the fastest growing chemical company in the world, and lastly as an entrepreneur. Experience has taught me that it pays to question everything… and then question it again.

That’s how I make my best investments, and I suspect that’s not a unique approach amongst posters in this thread given the number of guys bought into HGRAF here.

Where’s the link

Always good to see counterpoints in assessing investments.

I know that I’m trying not to get too excited and buy a dump truck of this knowing that it’s still a speculative play.

Reading Kevin Bs tweets on the daily can get you really pumped about this thing

quote:

---

Tigerdroppings now being researched by ChatGPT

---

Damn chicken… you made it big time

Congrats