- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Retiring at 50 with $2MM in savings
Posted on 5/19/26 at 2:51 pm to kywildcatfanone
Posted on 5/19/26 at 2:51 pm to kywildcatfanone
quote:
Why?
Probably because going back to work at 60 isn't supposed to be part of the plan. And that's what would likely happen barring some amazing market growth.
I mean, I'll be 55 when I retire and will have slightly more than the OP...5 less years to live, and slightly more money. And no way in hell will I be able to afford to "travel the world and live up life". At least not in the way that I define "travelling the world and living up life". To me that means multiple, probably at least three, overseas trips per year in addition to local travel and entertainment. Maybe you have a different perspective of it.
Posted on 5/19/26 at 3:26 pm to Everyday Is Saturday
quote:
Sleep!
Health & Fitness
Fun with wife (Honeymoon 2.0)
No Sunday or work stress
No more fractionization (involved in many things / projects at work all at once all the time)
Clear mindedness / spiritual awareness
More time used to help others
To do list control and completion
No more work travel
I could go on….
Yep and like I said, you don't read well.
Absolutely 0 of those is applicable to what I said.
You boomers aren't understanding the difference between financial independence and retirement.
I full understand quiting a 40+ hour career job.
The OP is about "retiring" with $2 mil. Being done with work.
My point is that you can quit a career job early and be financially independent, but still earn income in a multitude of ways.
Work as a Golf Course starter, for instance. Bass Pro shops, etc. You can do some small jobs, work as a handi man for example doing only specific jobs that you enjoy. You can have a second "career" and earn $20k or so and change the amount of money you need in retirement accounts drastically.
Posted on 5/19/26 at 3:28 pm to deuceiswild
quote:
Probably because going back to work at 60 isn't supposed to be part of the plan. And that's what would likely happen barring some amazing market growth.
I mean, I'll be 55 when I retire and will have slightly more than the OP...5 less years to live, and slightly more money. And no way in hell will I be able to afford to "travel the world and live up life". At least not in the way that I define "travelling the world and living up life". To me that means multiple, probably at least three, overseas trips per year in addition to local travel and entertainment. Maybe you have a different perspective of it.
Correct, and that's exactly my point. Being financially independent is one thing, but I don't want to be financially extremely limited also. I'm not going to stop working to cut coupons and just imagine if I had a little more money I could afford that one extra golf trip or whatever I want to go on every year.
Posted on 5/19/26 at 3:30 pm to xBirdx
quote:
It’s almost impossible to have $2mm in cash at 50
Not true at all, as has been said a few times already.
But to add some perspective, I didn't start my 401K till age 32. I did max it out every year since then. No catch-up payments over the last few yrs or anything fancy. I just maxed it out every year.
I am now 53 with $1.45M in that account (and we don't even have a very wide selection of funds to invest in). I plan to continue to max it out for my remaining two years.
I feel 100% certain that if I were able to start saving 7 or 8 yrs earlier while in my early 20s, I'd easily have over $2M in there. Probably significantly more than $2M.
Posted on 5/19/26 at 3:31 pm to notsince98
quote:
Seems there is a disconnect on the definition of retirement. Retirement doesnt just broadly mean "no income" anymore. Many people do part time gigs in retirement but focus on things they enjoy or even start their own business. For some folks retirement means never leaving the couch. These days, all you can safely assume is that one thing is ending (usually a career).
I would strongly disagree. Retirement is that, its literally retiring from working.
Being financially independent and not working a career 40+ hour a week job is exactly that.
This is my entire point. That's not what the OP said though. The OP is "can you retire at 50 with $2 mil".
The answer is absolutely. I mean you could buy a $250k house on a couple of acres and retire with $1 mil in retirement accounts, and live very frugaly.
Posted on 5/19/26 at 3:45 pm to baldona
quote:
Retirement is that, its literally retiring from working.
If we are getting literal, this is MW defintion:
quote:
The meaning of RETIRE is to withdraw from one's position or occupation : conclude one's working or professional career
That does not provide any definite meaning of what comes after that. Retirement is a personal thing and varies by person.
This post was edited on 5/19/26 at 3:46 pm
Posted on 5/19/26 at 6:32 pm to deuceiswild
IN CASH SAVINGS!!!
Not a 401k. I was referencing liquid cash
I’ve mentioned that multiple times here
Not a 401k. I was referencing liquid cash
I’ve mentioned that multiple times here
Posted on 5/19/26 at 6:40 pm to baldona
quote:
Correct, and that's exactly my point. Being financially independent is one thing, but I don't want to be financially extremely limited also.
4 posts to get to your point
+
I don’t read Auburnese well
=
Time neither of us will ever get back. Pity.
Curious adverb you choose—a very personal adverb. If you have higher level of wants than what $XMM retirement at YY age can provide, you don’t have financial freedom at that point. You are beholden to filling $ gaps to quench higher wants / thirst. If new found “retirement” requires you to trade your time and effort into work to satisfy those, of course that’s an option. Does not feel like retirement to me (when required/beholden to fill gaps), but personal finance is personal, assured as the sun rising in the east.
I think the desire for more, at the expense of enough, is where too many falter and find themselves on the depressed side of financial freedom continuum. And by ‘enough’, I’m speaking far and away from FIRE lifestyle or even any major sacrifices, if any at all.
My (personal) way of thinking: There is a breakeven point between higher retirement lifestyle and consuming precious retirement time to achieve it. This became abundantly clear to me when it took doubling our nest egg to improve retirement lifestyle beyond “the incremental” change. Doubling it consumed considerable precious time to achieve it. Decision taken: early retirement.
I believe the value of time and what is true meaning of freedom in retirement needs a line item in retirement spreadsheets! And it might also provide all needs and wants, in so doing. We are blessed. Hope you are, too.
Boomer (GenX) out.
This post was edited on 5/19/26 at 7:28 pm
Posted on 5/19/26 at 8:23 pm to notsince98
Health care and taxes potholes to navigate. I’m a year in but at 65 had one of those covered. 100K a year is very doable. Compounding interest is a beautiful thing.
Posted on 5/19/26 at 9:17 pm to xBirdx
My apologies.
That said, it can still be done, but it would be much harder. Youd need a high paying job and/or be single with no kids.
You'd have to dedicate after tax dollars which makes it harder to do. You also don't get the company match, but in my case our match is not as high as most. It's less than 5%.
You'd likely not be also saving in any retirement accounts unless you lived in a cardboard box or in your dads basement.
So I'll change my stance a little. While technically possible, it would require circumstances that make it practically impossible for most people.
That said, it can still be done, but it would be much harder. Youd need a high paying job and/or be single with no kids.
You'd have to dedicate after tax dollars which makes it harder to do. You also don't get the company match, but in my case our match is not as high as most. It's less than 5%.
You'd likely not be also saving in any retirement accounts unless you lived in a cardboard box or in your dads basement.
So I'll change my stance a little. While technically possible, it would require circumstances that make it practically impossible for most people.
Posted on 5/19/26 at 10:34 pm to xBirdx
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/19/26 at 11:21 pm
Posted on 5/20/26 at 7:38 am to deuceiswild
It’s possible to retire early and have enough accumulated that you are not limited in doing the things you’ve always dreamed of doing. It’s rare, though, and takes doing everything right and having good luck as well. Of course it’s all relative to your lifestyle lived and desired.
EDIT: Communist downvoters persist.
EDIT: Communist downvoters persist.
This post was edited on 5/20/26 at 8:31 am
Posted on 5/20/26 at 9:40 am to RoyalWe
quote:
It sounds like you’re not willing to do that, which is fine and a personal decision. It is, however, very possible.
That couple hundred thousand a year pay raise goes a long way
Multiply times two with a badass spouse and you’re talking a few hundred thousand dollar raise.
My wife and I have both 4x our salary’s the last 12 to 15 years. Now it took some work and moving from TX To AZ, NC, LA, and back to the motherland in TX but it’s certainly doable.
There’s a bunch of ways to get to 2 mil by 50. I woke up at 32 and was done making 60k a year. Gambled on myself and took a lower salary for commission/bonus comp plan and it’s been life changing.
I could chase more money but my work life balance is amazing so I don’t see the point.
Posted on 5/20/26 at 10:38 am to RoyalWe
quote:
EDIT: Communist downvoters persist
I'm not in the least. I down voted because of your echoing the theme that it takes "good luck." Other than the luck we all enjoy here of being in US at this time, I'd say it has very little to do with good luck. I did this with nothing but disciplined index investing, no company match and zero head start or family financial assist other than a few hundred $ here and there as a college student. All on single income most this time for a family of 4 on an above average but not high income. Discipline, reasonable frugality, and an early start is what it took. Anyone with a decent income over past 25 years could have done this.
Posted on 5/20/26 at 11:03 am to Everyday Is Saturday
quote:
My (personal) way of thinking: There is a breakeven point between higher retirement lifestyle and consuming precious retirement time to achieve it. This became abundantly clear to me when it took doubling our nest egg to improve retirement lifestyle beyond “the incremental” change. Doubling it consumed considerable precious time to achieve it. Decision taken: early retirement.
I believe the value of time and what is true meaning of freedom in retirement needs a line item in retirement spreadsheets! And it might also provide all needs and wants, in so doing. We are blessed. Hope you are, too.
Yes but the point you continue to leave out, is that if you are busting your butt in your 30s and 40s to retire early you are also losing precious time there.
There's a balance.
I just went to Rome with my kids. It cost more than I wanted. I could have went on a vacation 1/4 of the cost and put the rest to retirement. I didn't splurge grossly on anything we did, and I enjoyed all of it. I did it because I wanted to not just go to Rome, I wanted to go to Rome with my kids at a certain age to show them the world and educate them on many aspects of history, culture, religion, etc. This came at a significant cost.
In making decisions like that, I am delaying my true "retirement"..
My point goes back to the OP, $2 mil at 50 is not a ton. Why not continue to work part time and get that number to $3 or maybe even $4 mil and find a balance in life?
This whole idea that "work" = unhappiness is simply un true. If you hate your life, absolutely change it.
This post was edited on 5/20/26 at 11:12 am
Posted on 5/20/26 at 1:00 pm to baldona
quote:
Yes but the point you continue to leave out, is that if you are busting your butt in your 30s and 40s to retire early you are also losing precious time there.
Suppose a 9 month gestation period is lost time, too? Most of the 3rd trimester is really just a formality anyway. Kidding.
I think earlier in careers you are using time to create time (an early retirement). But it takes time to build critical $ mass to achieve it.
Our plan was to achieve it in full when ejecting from work.
I hear you. If you call it early retirement but have to work (enjoyed or not), that makes sense. We just tend to be more black n white, not modifying our vision for complete financial freedom / pure available retirement time of life to call it “early retirement”.
Balance for sure! We did some big things earlier in life for similar reasons. We also found that the little things were often the big things, another form of balance.
Thats the personal part of personal finance.
Bottom line: enjoy your life and family.
Posted on 5/21/26 at 10:22 am to baldona
quote:it is for me
This whole idea that "work" = unhappiness is simply un true.
frick work. Fun is where it’s at
Posted on 5/21/26 at 12:07 pm to cgrand
quote:
“work" = unhappiness is simply un true.
Happiest day of my week is Sunday (evening in particular). And it’s NOT because I get to go to work on Monday!
Quite the opposite.
Close second happiest day of week is the rest of them. The days are Saturdays, and the nights are Fridays.
Just damned glorious!
Posted on 5/21/26 at 12:41 pm to TorchtheFlyingTiger
quote:The Psychology of Money speaks to "luck" in wealth accumulation. Luck can absolutely play a role in whether you are successful or how successful you are. If it makes you feel better, I'll modify it to say it takes not having really bad luck.
I down voted because of your echoing the theme that it takes "good luck."
Posted on 5/21/26 at 12:56 pm to RoyalWe
I had incredible luck. Not ashamed in any way to acknowledge that. But there is a lot of luck to go around you just have to be in the right position (with plenty of flexibility) to take advantage of it
Popular
Back to top


1






