Started By
Message

re: Diving deeper on Standard Lithium?

Posted on 5/29/25 at 9:25 am to
Posted by skewbs
Member since Apr 2008
2139 posts
Posted on 5/29/25 at 9:25 am to
Profits will be taken all the way up. Thats pretty much assured. Good day to do that depending on your position.

Long-term baws, today does not matter.
Posted by The Sultan of Swine
Member since Nov 2010
8285 posts
Posted on 5/29/25 at 9:28 am to
I still like the mid $2s as a target. As mentioned before, the lithium price is trying to hold this thing down, so we'll see
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
144922 posts
Posted on 5/29/25 at 11:12 am to
quote:

Long-term baws, today does not matter.

Posted by SmackoverHawg
Member since Oct 2011
29005 posts
Posted on 5/29/25 at 11:57 am to
Wouldn't doubt if they are doing some fund raising to fill the coffers a little more.
Posted by OldSouth
Folsom, LA
Member since Oct 2011
10977 posts
Posted on 5/29/25 at 12:41 pm to
This is such bullshite.
Posted by Wraytex
San Antonio - Gonzales
Member since Jun 2020
2938 posts
Posted on 5/29/25 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

This is such bullshite.



Yep! Added more.
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
144922 posts
Posted on 5/29/25 at 1:34 pm to
I hooked my wagon to this rollercoaster securely yesterday….. not sure I even have a choice but to buy more at a 3% discount today



Fml
Posted by Wraytex
San Antonio - Gonzales
Member since Jun 2020
2938 posts
Posted on 5/29/25 at 2:24 pm to
Now we find out if this outfit ever intended to make it to production or if they start talking buyout.
Posted by Ballstein32
Member since May 2020
399 posts
Posted on 5/29/25 at 4:05 pm to
If Exxon or Albemarle or Equinor or Koch or Tesla or any number of other companies wanted to buy them out i would be a happy camper.
Posted by Wraytex
San Antonio - Gonzales
Member since Jun 2020
2938 posts
Posted on 5/29/25 at 4:23 pm to
Does the Govt grant pass through to a buyer?
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
23175 posts
Posted on 5/29/25 at 6:07 pm to
quote:

Now we find out if this outfit ever intended to make it to production or if they start talking buyout.


They have been producing battery grade lithium since the beginning, they just couldn't sell it due to the royalty hang-up. I don't know how much the demo plant can produce, but any amount sold should make some waves.

I recall that they did install a few scaled up units a while back.

Anyone know what their current demo plant production capacity is?
Posted by CarbonAce
Member since Apr 2021
182 posts
Posted on 5/29/25 at 6:33 pm to
They cant sell from demo plant!
Posted by Ballstein32
Member since May 2020
399 posts
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:00 pm to
No clue, but I'd guess no.
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
144922 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 8:46 am to
quote:

They have been producing battery grade lithium since the beginning, they just couldn't sell it due to the royalty hang-up. I don't know how much the demo plant can produce, but any amount sold should make some waves. I recall that they did install a few scaled up units a while back. Anyone know what their current demo plant production capacity is?
Grok says


The demonstration plant is primarily designed for testing and refining the DLE process, not for commercial production. The royalty rate approval applies specifically to the Reynolds Unit, which is part of the planned commercial-scale operation targeting 22,500 tonnes per year of battery-quality lithium carbonate, with full production expected by 2028. There’s no indication in the available information that the demonstration plant’s output is intended for commercial sale or covered under the royalty agreement for immediate sales.

Additionally, selling lithium from the demo plant would likely require further regulatory approvals, including environmental permits and commercial production licenses, which are separate from the royalty rate approval. The SWA Project has received federal support, such as a $225 million Department of Energy grant and fast-track status under Executive Order 14241, but these are geared toward development and eventual commercial production, not immediate sales from the demo facility.

In summary, while the royalty rate approval is a critical step for the SWA Project’s commercial phase, it does not explicitly allow Standard Lithium to sell lithium from their demonstration plant. The plant’s purpose remains focused on technology validation, and commercial sales would likely require additional permissions and infrastructure development.






Posted by BestBanker
Member since Nov 2011
18268 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 9:00 am to
So, please just ask Grok if we should sell now?
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
144922 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 9:09 am to
I honestly hadn’t done enough reading and was thinking they would be selling from the demo plant. I’m not sure why they wouldn’t have been working towards being able to sell the lithium produced. Makes me lean much more towards their ultimate goal being to sell the technology.
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
144922 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 9:13 am to
Reasons to Consider Holding SLI

1. Recent Positive Developments:
• Royalty Approval: The Arkansas Oil and Gas Commission’s unanimous approval of a 2.5% royalty rate for the South West Arkansas (SWA) Project’s Phase 1 on May 28, 2025, is a significant milestone. This removes a regulatory hurdle and supports the project’s path to commercial production, expected by 2028 with a target of 22,500 tonnes of battery-grade lithium carbonate annually.
• Technological Progress: Standard Lithium’s Direct Lithium Extraction (DLE) technology has achieved a 99% lithium recovery rate in pilot testing, positioning the company as a leader in innovative lithium extraction. This could enhance its long-term value as demand for lithium grows with electric vehicle (EV) adoption.
• Federal Support: The SWA Project’s designation as a “priority transparency critical mineral project” under Executive Order 14241, along with a $225 million Department of Energy grant, signals strong U.S. government backing to reduce reliance on foreign lithium supplies. This could bolster investor confidence and project financing.
2. Financial Position:
• As of Q1 2025, Standard Lithium reported a cash position of $31.6 million and working capital of $31.3 million, indicating financial stability to support ongoing development. The company also reduced its net loss from $7.7 million in Q1 2024 to $1.6 million in Q1 2025, showing improved financial management.
• The company’s Altman Z-Score of 10.65 suggests a very low bankruptcy risk, and a current ratio of 4.37 reflects strong liquidity.
3. Market Sentiment:
• Posts on X indicate bullish sentiment, with some users noting SLI’s strong technical structure after breaking out above resistance levels, suggesting potential for further upside.
• Analyst coverage, such as a Seeking Alpha report from April 2025, views SLI as undervalued with significant upside potential due to its partnerships (e.g., with Equinor) and high-quality assets in the Smackover Formation.
4. Long-Term Lithium Demand:
• Despite short-term fluctuations in lithium prices (down to ~$10,600/ton from $85,000/ton two years ago), the long-term outlook for lithium remains strong due to EV growth and energy storage needs. Standard Lithium’s focus on sustainable DLE technology positions it well for future demand.


Reasons to Consider Selling SLI

1. Lack of Current Revenue:
• Standard Lithium is not yet producing lithium commercially, with full production not expected until 2028. This makes it a high-risk investment, as it relies on future milestones like completing the Definitive Feasibility Study (DFS) and securing offtake agreements.
• The company faces potential funding challenges, as its joint venture partner Equinor’s funding is expected to be exhausted in Q2 2025, requiring Standard Lithium to cover its share of capital expenditures. This could lead to stock dilution if additional financing is needed.
2. Stock Volatility:
• SLI’s stock price has been volatile, with a 1-year range of $1.07–$2.64 and a current price of $1.765 (as of May 30, 2025). While it’s up 5.06% year-over-year, it remains well below its historical highs (e.g., $39.99 in 2016). The stock surged 48.5% in October 2024 after a sector-wide rally but has since moderated.
• The lack of a P/E ratio or dividend yield reflects its pre-revenue status, making it less appealing for income-focused investors.
3. Market Risks:
• Lithium prices remain cyclical, and while some analysts believe prices have bottomed, others warn of oversupply risks if EV adoption slows. This could pressure SLI’s valuation if market conditions deteriorate.
• Competition from larger, revenue-generating lithium producers like Albemarle and SQM, which trade at lower sales multiples, could overshadow SLI’s potential in the near term.
4. Historical Risks:
• Past short reports, such as those from Hindenburg Research and Blue Orca in 2021–2022, raised concerns about SLI’s technology and financial transparency, contributing to significant stock declines. While these are older issues, they highlight the speculative nature of the stock.
Posted by SmackoverHawg
Member since Oct 2011
29005 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 9:35 am to
quote:

In summary, while the royalty rate approval is a critical step for the SWA Project’s commercial phase, it does not explicitly allow Standard Lithium to sell lithium from their demonstration plant. The plant’s purpose remains focused on technology validation, and commercial sales would likely require additional permissions and infrastructure development.



Trump's recent moves should make this easier and less costly if they do. The original plan was to get the lanxess site producing like 100-200 tons/ year from the demo and sell that to help fund the build, but many things have changed since then. So...I have no clue and would just be pulling it out of my arse right now, but I'll ask around and see what the plans may be.
Posted by ev247
Member since Nov 2022
448 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:38 am to
I don’t see their goal being to sell the technology.

Standard owns DLE technology and has instead chosen to license Koch’s DLE technology because it’s better in several critical ways (uses less reagents and water, reduces overall opex costs). If Standard wanted to sell their tech, the sales pitch might be funny: “Please buy this tech that we ourselves turned our backs on, even before fully proving its viability at commercial scale.”
Posted by CharleyLake
Member since Oct 2006
1406 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:39 am to
Thank you for taking time to make this clear and concise evaluation. I have 11,000 + shares in an IRA and my basis is about $5/share. I stubbornly failed to cut my losses a few years ago and now I suspect that I am in the investment for the long haul.

Nonetheless your reasons provided help me define the situation.
Jump to page
Page First 952 953 954 955
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 954 of 955Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram