- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Did y'all catch Dave Ramsey rip George Kamel apart over withdrawing 4% from retirement?
Posted on 4/3/24 at 7:48 am
Posted on 4/3/24 at 7:48 am
George's Video - Bookmarked at 5:15
Caller asks about George's 4%
George says 4%. His example is retiring at 30.
Dave says 8%. His example is retiring at 60-ish (I'm assuming). The caller doesn't make it known to Dave that George's example is the age of 30.
According to Dave, if you're making 12% on mutual funds and S&P is avg. 11.8%, and if you account for an average of 4% inflation per year, withdrawing 8% is fine.
What's the Money Board think?
Caller asks about George's 4%
George says 4%. His example is retiring at 30.
Dave says 8%. His example is retiring at 60-ish (I'm assuming). The caller doesn't make it known to Dave that George's example is the age of 30.
According to Dave, if you're making 12% on mutual funds and S&P is avg. 11.8%, and if you account for an average of 4% inflation per year, withdrawing 8% is fine.
What's the Money Board think?
Posted on 4/3/24 at 7:55 am to finchmeister08
Who is in the 100% S&P 500 during retirement? So, the. 70 year old would have had 25-30% of his investable assets wiped out in 2022?
This post was edited on 4/3/24 at 8:50 am
Posted on 4/3/24 at 7:57 am to finchmeister08
Dave Ramsey has always had really bad investment/retirement withdrawal rate advice.
He rails on the 4% rule where the math clearly shows why investment pros actually recommend that. I've seen him on calls before say you can withdraw 10% of your balance every year and you should be fine in retirement, forget the 8%. Basically he tries to make retiring on just $1M sound a lot better than it really is "you can take out $100k/yr with $1M in retirement accounts" etc...He also assumes you leave everything in aggressive growth stocks forever, never get more conservative in your portfolio.
Imagine giving that advice to someone who retired at the end of 2007 with $1M in S&P 500, "You can take out $100k a year". That person would have about $500k or close to it by the end of 2008 taking out $100k and losing 40% roughly of balance. So now they take out $100k from from a $500k balance the next year after?
Also his "well I get 12-13% annually on my portfolio" is utter horseshite if he follows his own investment advice which is 25% large/middle/small cap growth each and then 25% more in international. International has been utter crap for a long time now, there's no way a 25% even breakdown among those categories is giving you a 12-13% annual rate of return over the last decade or two. Moneyguy shows busted this up pretty bad before on Ramsey testing his hypothetical portfolio, where they even chose some of the best in his categories and came nowhere near a 12-13% annual rate of return.
He rails on the 4% rule where the math clearly shows why investment pros actually recommend that. I've seen him on calls before say you can withdraw 10% of your balance every year and you should be fine in retirement, forget the 8%. Basically he tries to make retiring on just $1M sound a lot better than it really is "you can take out $100k/yr with $1M in retirement accounts" etc...He also assumes you leave everything in aggressive growth stocks forever, never get more conservative in your portfolio.
Imagine giving that advice to someone who retired at the end of 2007 with $1M in S&P 500, "You can take out $100k a year". That person would have about $500k or close to it by the end of 2008 taking out $100k and losing 40% roughly of balance. So now they take out $100k from from a $500k balance the next year after?

Also his "well I get 12-13% annually on my portfolio" is utter horseshite if he follows his own investment advice which is 25% large/middle/small cap growth each and then 25% more in international. International has been utter crap for a long time now, there's no way a 25% even breakdown among those categories is giving you a 12-13% annual rate of return over the last decade or two. Moneyguy shows busted this up pretty bad before on Ramsey testing his hypothetical portfolio, where they even chose some of the best in his categories and came nowhere near a 12-13% annual rate of return.
This post was edited on 4/3/24 at 8:00 am
Posted on 4/3/24 at 8:01 am to finchmeister08
I watched a video the algorithm suggested to me a few weeks ago on this and they showed the math and basically exposed Dave as a fricking idiot.
His basic financial plan is good for (1) dumb people (2) people who had no financial education but are willing to change. Basically getting you out of hoc and starting to save.
Almost anything else Dave Ramsey says is not based in anything (other than his magical investment opportunities that are secret) and is much more often bad advice than good advice.
His basic financial plan is good for (1) dumb people (2) people who had no financial education but are willing to change. Basically getting you out of hoc and starting to save.
Almost anything else Dave Ramsey says is not based in anything (other than his magical investment opportunities that are secret) and is much more often bad advice than good advice.
Posted on 4/3/24 at 8:03 am to thunderbird1100
quote:
Also his "well I get 12-13% annually on my portfolio" is utter horseshite if he follows his own investment advice which is 25% large/middle/small cap growth each and then 25% more in international. International has been utter crap for a long time now, there's no way a 25% even breakdown among those categories is giving you a 12-13% annual rate of return over the last decade or two. Moneyguy shows busted this up pretty bad before on Ramsey testing his hypothetical portfolio, where they even chose some of the best in his categories and came nowhere near a 12-13% annual rate of return.
These magical investments are always the thing that kills any analysis of his investment advice.
We can all crate hypothetical scenarios of amazing ways to invest if we get to rely on magical unicorn investment outlets.

Posted on 4/3/24 at 8:07 am to finchmeister08
Ramsey is a shock jock that likes to shame people out of debt. It works for his purpose
But if you are a responsible person he offers no advice worth taking.
But if you are a responsible person he offers no advice worth taking.
Posted on 4/3/24 at 8:18 am to finchmeister08
8% very comfortable?
Tell that to the guy who retired in 2000 taking 8% out for 15 years..
Tell that to the guy who retired in 2000 taking 8% out for 15 years..
Posted on 4/3/24 at 8:47 am to finchmeister08
It is always relative to income. Can't focus on withdrawal rate alone.
Also, a steady withdrawal rate never materializes. Withdrawal rates fluctuate with age. Most go thru some years of spending more on key wishes and less in other years. Medical costs and insurance affect withdrawal rates and can fluctuate by large amounts.
Also, a steady withdrawal rate never materializes. Withdrawal rates fluctuate with age. Most go thru some years of spending more on key wishes and less in other years. Medical costs and insurance affect withdrawal rates and can fluctuate by large amounts.
Posted on 4/3/24 at 9:24 am to finchmeister08
He knows most his core audience would capitulate if they knew 4% SWR was the realistic planning factor. He is selling hope and financial freedom for folks w little or no savings. Tell them they need $1m to replace $40k income and most wont think it's attainable and will just say F it and keep living beyond their means.
He's either an idiot for not understanding sequence of returns risk or a being a savvy/somewhat slimy marketer. I dont think he's actually that dumb. Dave has done a lot of good but this one really irritates me. I get it, if he doesnt want to take away people's hope but it's very disingenuous unless he is just a fool.
He's either an idiot for not understanding sequence of returns risk or a being a savvy/somewhat slimy marketer. I dont think he's actually that dumb. Dave has done a lot of good but this one really irritates me. I get it, if he doesnt want to take away people's hope but it's very disingenuous unless he is just a fool.
Posted on 4/3/24 at 11:06 am to TorchtheFlyingTiger
I have been looking at safe withdrawal estimates for a long time. I think the 4% rule is a good starting point for estimating how far retirement assets will go but the math behind it is very rigid. For instance, are you going to withdraw 4% from your retirement account every year and quit? Or, after a couple of good years in the stock market, are you going to withdraw 9% so you can buy a new truck (or roof, or AC) that year, but figure you are still safe because 4% of what's left is going to be enough next year? Are you going to try to get by on 3.5% if the stock market declines for a couple of years, maybe skip a vacation or something? When you compare the options of taking Social Security at age 62, 67, or 70 do you still plan to draw your assets down by 4% in each scenario?
It's a very typical of economists who keep preaching that the economy is like a pie, and that if someone gets a bigger piece, then everyone else's piece has to be smaller. In reality, everyone will adjust their spending somewhat to conditions. We see that every day in economic statistics when consumer adjust their spending based on how they perceive the economy. You will do the same in retirement, and a great many will crash and burn regardless of what withdrawal rate they choose.
In all those "Monte Carlo Analysis" scenarios, usually something like 8% is a safe withdrawal rate in something more than 60% of all scenarios (don't hold me to exact numbers this is off the top of my head), and 4% is safe in 95%. I don't go out deep sea fishing when there are 12 foot swells, if the water is too rough, I stay home. That's how people live, and how most are going to manage retirement assets. The 4% rule, or 8%, or 12%, are useful numbers, but life is different than that, and you will adjust your behavior to the situation at hand. If you have been good at doing that all your life, you probably will continue to be good in retirement.
Just remember the fable of the ant and the grasshopper. If the market is good for a few years, plan on that truck, but plan on stashing some of your wealth in some asset to prepare for the inevitable times when the market will not be good.
It's a very typical of economists who keep preaching that the economy is like a pie, and that if someone gets a bigger piece, then everyone else's piece has to be smaller. In reality, everyone will adjust their spending somewhat to conditions. We see that every day in economic statistics when consumer adjust their spending based on how they perceive the economy. You will do the same in retirement, and a great many will crash and burn regardless of what withdrawal rate they choose.
In all those "Monte Carlo Analysis" scenarios, usually something like 8% is a safe withdrawal rate in something more than 60% of all scenarios (don't hold me to exact numbers this is off the top of my head), and 4% is safe in 95%. I don't go out deep sea fishing when there are 12 foot swells, if the water is too rough, I stay home. That's how people live, and how most are going to manage retirement assets. The 4% rule, or 8%, or 12%, are useful numbers, but life is different than that, and you will adjust your behavior to the situation at hand. If you have been good at doing that all your life, you probably will continue to be good in retirement.
Just remember the fable of the ant and the grasshopper. If the market is good for a few years, plan on that truck, but plan on stashing some of your wealth in some asset to prepare for the inevitable times when the market will not be good.
This post was edited on 4/3/24 at 11:17 am
Posted on 4/3/24 at 12:17 pm to finchmeister08
quote:
What's the Money Board think?
I think Ramsey is hack and a hypocrite. He uses God to sell. He takes government incentives while railing against them. To get hired there, they interview your spouse and will fire you if you have a kid out of wedlock. Super creepy vibe in those offices. They have a "righteous living policy"
quote:
Ramsey and other company executives said in their depositions they don't fire employees for engaging in oral sex outside of marriage, but only sexual intercourse.
quote:
the company fired a male employee whose wife was pregnant after company officials calculated the date of conception was before the couple got married, according to transcripts with depositions with multiple company officials and copies of their emails. Another female employee was fired after her boyfriend was reportedly seen walking around her apartment building one morning in boxers.
If an employee is living with a boyfriend or girlfriend, company officials assume the couple is having premarital sex, thus necessitating that employee's termination, Ramsey and another company executive said in depositions.
LINK
Posted on 4/3/24 at 12:47 pm to BottomlandBrew
quote:
He takes government incentives while railing against them.
this isn't some type of gotcha. You can totally be against govt handouts and still take them. Might as well have good people taking that money (who probably actually paid taxes anyway) and do something good with that money. Any money passed up by the good folks just ends up with the wrong folks.
there should have been no covid stimulus checks but you'd be crazy if you didn't take it and keep it.
This post was edited on 4/3/24 at 12:49 pm
Posted on 4/3/24 at 12:52 pm to finchmeister08
I mean an 8% withdrawal rate is fine if you can guarantee 12% returns every year without fail.
But all it takes is just one bad year of a 20% drop and you have a huge problem on your hands.
Remember, this guy went bankrupt. He didn't all of a sudden learn some magic financial breakthrough.
Having no consumer debt, especially no credit card debt, is great advice for anyone. He likes to say it's advice his grandma would give... and he is 100% correct.
But Dave has figured out that if you become an "expert" in one area, then people will let you sell other areas to them... and when you sprinkle in some religion... it makes a lot of sense.
He's basically Joel Osteen in corporate form instead of church form.
But all it takes is just one bad year of a 20% drop and you have a huge problem on your hands.
Remember, this guy went bankrupt. He didn't all of a sudden learn some magic financial breakthrough.
Having no consumer debt, especially no credit card debt, is great advice for anyone. He likes to say it's advice his grandma would give... and he is 100% correct.
But Dave has figured out that if you become an "expert" in one area, then people will let you sell other areas to them... and when you sprinkle in some religion... it makes a lot of sense.
He's basically Joel Osteen in corporate form instead of church form.
Posted on 4/3/24 at 1:12 pm to finchmeister08
Dave is retarded because he is acting like SOR risk doesn’t exist.
Posted on 4/3/24 at 1:32 pm to finchmeister08
Seems like Ramsey's advice is to live in a shack while having a million in the bank and then die and pass it off to your children who will continue living in that shack.
Posted on 4/3/24 at 1:36 pm to finchmeister08
quote:
Dave Ramsey
Buy your house with cash. If you're coming from nothing this is almost impossible.

Posted on 4/3/24 at 1:39 pm to jcaz
quote:
Seems like Ramsey's advice is to live in a shack while having a million in the bank and then die and pass it off to your children who will continue living in that shack.
People who choose to live with less are much happier than those that choose to live with more.
Posted on 4/3/24 at 2:01 pm to notsince98
quote:
People who choose to live with less are much happier than those that choose to live with more.
A 2500 square foot house and a new car isn't living with more if you are otherwise not in the red budget wise.
I reject Ramsey because even when you are otherwise financially healthy, he'd rather you drive a beater and max out your roth IRA. Enjoy life a little.
Posted on 4/3/24 at 2:17 pm to finchmeister08
Dave Ramsey is a very good for general purpose “how to handle money and run your household financially”. It’s not an end point, it’s a basic overview guide. Many many people will not get past the basic overview. Certainly most on money talk are way beyond that overview and focused on maximizing every avenue they can. Most Americans are not money talk
Popular
Back to top
