Started By
Message

re: At what age did you / do you plan to start taking social security?

Posted on 3/25/25 at 8:41 pm to
Posted by fallguy_1978
Best States #50
Member since Feb 2018
52928 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 8:41 pm to
quote:

Initially 62 - reversed that decision - returned amount disbursed - drew at 65

I'm going to have to work until 65 most likely for health insurance reasons alone.
Posted by bulldog95
North Louisiana
Member since Jan 2011
21168 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 9:25 pm to
Probably 65-67 depends on economy, work life balance, and how much is in my Roth. Right now I’m averaging between .$600-$800 a month in dividends in my Roth
Posted by KillTheGophers
Member since Jan 2016
6726 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 11:14 pm to
Me, 70
Wife, 62

I’ll die way before her and my salary is substantially more than hers.
Posted by Stamps74
Member since Nov 2017
1331 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 4:54 am to
quote:

dividends in my Roth


I’m so ignorant on all this, I thought somebody in different thread said don’t put dividend stocks in Roth.

I understand one size doesn’t fit all.
Posted by Fat Bastard
2024 NFL pick'em champion
Member since Mar 2009
87964 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 7:56 am to
quote:

You both can’t max it out on just one person’s earnings record, but it’s different if she has her own record on which to draw.

ETA - I see it’s been covered


yes, i had it wrong. misunderstood. yes, she has her own SS record from working all her life so she will be able to get max money as well with me in retirement.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
57723 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 8:39 am to
I got my 40 quarters in before coming to work for the state. I plan to retire with ~25 years in, which will put me at ~65. Since I am not paying in, taking it later won't increase my benefits (at least I don't think it will since we don't pay in). If that's the case, I'll take them when I hit 67 (I may push retirement back a couple of years to do it all together, just depends on the economy, my health and what's going on in mine and the wife's lives at the time).
Posted by Bdiddy
Member since Jul 2021
308 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 9:11 am to
quote:

There is no household limit on SS. Each individual will get whatever they have earned.


You received an accidental downvote as I hit the wrong "thumb". You are correct regarding there being a household limit that would keep them from maxing both SS amounts.
Posted by KWL85
Member since Mar 2023
2980 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 9:36 am to
. If SS is just a supplement and you aren't reliant on it, take it as early as possible and just invest that money.
________

Not a slam dunk on this. Delaying is getting a guaranteed 8%. If you are already heavily invested with your other money, then there is nothing wrong with leaving some in a guaranteed basket.

Also, drawing earlier has tax implications if you are still earning income.
Posted by VABuckeye
NOVA
Member since Dec 2007
38283 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 9:38 am to
quote:

Also, drawing earlier has tax implications if you are still earning income.


It salso creates the possibility that the amount of SS received can be reduced. $1 for every $2 earned over $22320 for the year.

There is no one size fits all for this. People need to research and see what their situation is.
Posted by Sho Nuff
Oahu
Member since Feb 2009
13373 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 9:49 am to
quote:

Outside of a really poor health situation or family history, drawing early is the gamble.

In my head the gamble is two-fold:
Our shite govt eating up all/most of my SS and I don't know when I'll die. I just retired at 50 and based on my investments and plan, I won't "need" the money at 62. However, I am thinking of taking it and just investing it. Yes, I get that waiting can increase it a guaranteed amount vs investing, but is there a guarantee it will still be there a few years later? Is it a guarantee I won't die in my 70's and therefore waiting wasn't the right play? Those are the questions we can't answer.

I'm honestly still not sure what I plan on doing as I go back and forth with it. My wife is 7 years younger than me so I checked that link from Fat Bastard and it says my wife should draw at 62 and me 70. I just don't think I'll live long enough to make sense of drawing at 70. I'm open ears to suggestions.
Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
43996 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 9:50 am to
When I turn 62, that's the year that they projecting will be the last will full payouts.
Posted by Fat Bastard
2024 NFL pick'em champion
Member since Mar 2009
87964 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 9:59 am to
im leaning towards drawing at 62 now for all the unknown reasons BUT, i will still be making money with passive and investment income and maybe still running my business. That may make that NULL and VOID to where i have to wait until 67 for it to not affect my current income. I always planned to retire WITHOUT SS so i really have not kept up as to how it works as I never expected it.

The biggest concern for mew is healthcare then having medicare and having to get a supplemental plan. all this crap could blow up before i retire.

i might work 10, 15 or 20 more years. who knows. i will always be making money with investments though. NFW did i ever prepare to rely on SS alone. we learned that decades back which should pay off for us. almost look at SS as some type of bonus $$$

edited above per VA buckeye corrections

This post was edited on 3/26/25 at 10:13 am
Posted by VABuckeye
NOVA
Member since Dec 2007
38283 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 10:06 am to
quote:

where i have to wait until 67 for it to be tax free


Turning 67 does not mean it is tax free. It just means that you aren't income limited so your disbursement can't be reduced. You can still be taxed on up to 85% of your SS disburesement depending on your AGI. (Maybe MAGI).
Posted by Fat Bastard
2024 NFL pick'em champion
Member since Mar 2009
87964 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 10:09 am to
quote:

Turning 67 does not mean it is tax free. It just means that you aren't income limited so your disbursement can't be reduced. You can still be taxed on up to 85% of your SS disburesement depending on your AGI. (Maybe MAGI).



gotcha. i chose wrong words. i meant it will not be reduced based on my income.

sounds like i'm screwed until 67 now regardless. well at least i know now.
Posted by geauxpurple
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2014
16259 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 10:12 am to
66 years and 8 months.
Full retirement age.
Just applied for it.
Posted by VABuckeye
NOVA
Member since Dec 2007
38283 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 10:17 am to
I'm stuck in the wait until 67 boat as well. My wife has a small bookkeeping business and is able to keep her reportable income below the $22320 threshhold.
Posted by FortunateSon
Tennessee
Member since Apr 2024
91 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 10:59 am to
Me: 70
Wife: 62

Our reasoning is that if something happens to me, my wife will be eligible for my check amount. I want to make that amount as high as possible.
Posted by Sho Nuff
Oahu
Member since Feb 2009
13373 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 11:05 am to
quote:

almost look at SS as some type of bonus $$$


This is exactly how I am looking at it and am fortunate (plus hard work) to be able to.
Posted by Dixie2023
Member since Mar 2023
4578 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 11:07 am to
62. I’m retiring early and will make do on what is due me and leave retirement account alone as long as I can. I’d rather live my life bf turning elderly.
Posted by nctiger71
North Carolina
Member since Oct 2017
1414 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 11:58 am to
quote:

Me: 70 Wife: 62

Our reasoning is that if something happens to me, my wife will be eligible for my check amount. I want to make that amount as high as possible.
I took it at 70, wife took the spousal amount at 65 or 66 - whatever age it maxed out for her.

The idea above was one reason. We’re both healthy (as far as we know) and she will likely live into her 90s. I retired at about 65 and lived off savings for 5 years. Another reason for waiting was the market was flat when I retired and waiting to take SS had a built in 7-8% annual growth rate. And future COLAs would be based on larger current payments.

If either of us would have had a serious health issue we would not have waited. But, if making that decision today and given the current US debt amount I’m not sure I would wait. I don’t have as much faith in SS being there now as I did 11 years ago.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram