- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: At what age did you / do you plan to start taking social security?
Posted on 3/25/25 at 8:41 pm to wfallstiger
Posted on 3/25/25 at 8:41 pm to wfallstiger
quote:
Initially 62 - reversed that decision - returned amount disbursed - drew at 65
I'm going to have to work until 65 most likely for health insurance reasons alone.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 9:25 pm to Artificial Ignorance
Probably 65-67 depends on economy, work life balance, and how much is in my Roth. Right now I’m averaging between .$600-$800 a month in dividends in my Roth
Posted on 3/25/25 at 11:14 pm to Artificial Ignorance
Me, 70
Wife, 62
I’ll die way before her and my salary is substantially more than hers.
Wife, 62
I’ll die way before her and my salary is substantially more than hers.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 4:54 am to bulldog95
quote:
dividends in my Roth
I’m so ignorant on all this, I thought somebody in different thread said don’t put dividend stocks in Roth.
I understand one size doesn’t fit all.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 7:56 am to slackster
quote:
You both can’t max it out on just one person’s earnings record, but it’s different if she has her own record on which to draw.
ETA - I see it’s been covered
yes, i had it wrong. misunderstood. yes, she has her own SS record from working all her life so she will be able to get max money as well with me in retirement.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 8:39 am to Artificial Ignorance
I got my 40 quarters in before coming to work for the state. I plan to retire with ~25 years in, which will put me at ~65. Since I am not paying in, taking it later won't increase my benefits (at least I don't think it will since we don't pay in). If that's the case, I'll take them when I hit 67 (I may push retirement back a couple of years to do it all together, just depends on the economy, my health and what's going on in mine and the wife's lives at the time).
Posted on 3/26/25 at 9:11 am to deathvalleytiger10
quote:
There is no household limit on SS. Each individual will get whatever they have earned.
You received an accidental downvote as I hit the wrong "thumb". You are correct regarding there being a household limit that would keep them from maxing both SS amounts.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 9:36 am to VolSquatch
. If SS is just a supplement and you aren't reliant on it, take it as early as possible and just invest that money.
________
Not a slam dunk on this. Delaying is getting a guaranteed 8%. If you are already heavily invested with your other money, then there is nothing wrong with leaving some in a guaranteed basket.
Also, drawing earlier has tax implications if you are still earning income.
________
Not a slam dunk on this. Delaying is getting a guaranteed 8%. If you are already heavily invested with your other money, then there is nothing wrong with leaving some in a guaranteed basket.
Also, drawing earlier has tax implications if you are still earning income.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 9:38 am to KWL85
quote:
Also, drawing earlier has tax implications if you are still earning income.
It salso creates the possibility that the amount of SS received can be reduced. $1 for every $2 earned over $22320 for the year.
There is no one size fits all for this. People need to research and see what their situation is.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 9:49 am to slackster
quote:
Outside of a really poor health situation or family history, drawing early is the gamble.
In my head the gamble is two-fold:
Our shite govt eating up all/most of my SS and I don't know when I'll die. I just retired at 50 and based on my investments and plan, I won't "need" the money at 62. However, I am thinking of taking it and just investing it. Yes, I get that waiting can increase it a guaranteed amount vs investing, but is there a guarantee it will still be there a few years later? Is it a guarantee I won't die in my 70's and therefore waiting wasn't the right play? Those are the questions we can't answer.
I'm honestly still not sure what I plan on doing as I go back and forth with it. My wife is 7 years younger than me
Posted on 3/26/25 at 9:50 am to Artificial Ignorance
When I turn 62, that's the year that they projecting will be the last will full payouts.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 9:59 am to Sho Nuff
im leaning towards drawing at 62 now for all the unknown reasons BUT, i will still be making money with passive and investment income and maybe still running my business. That may make that NULL and VOID to where i have to wait until 67 for it to not affect my current income. I always planned to retire WITHOUT SS so i really have not kept up as to how it works as I never expected it.
The biggest concern for mew is healthcare then having medicare and having to get a supplemental plan. all this crap could blow up before i retire.
i might work 10, 15 or 20 more years. who knows. i will always be making money with investments though. NFW did i ever prepare to rely on SS alone. we learned that decades back which should pay off for us. almost look at SS as some type of bonus $$$
edited above per VA buckeye corrections
The biggest concern for mew is healthcare then having medicare and having to get a supplemental plan. all this crap could blow up before i retire.
i might work 10, 15 or 20 more years. who knows. i will always be making money with investments though. NFW did i ever prepare to rely on SS alone. we learned that decades back which should pay off for us. almost look at SS as some type of bonus $$$
edited above per VA buckeye corrections
This post was edited on 3/26/25 at 10:13 am
Posted on 3/26/25 at 10:06 am to Fat Bastard
quote:
where i have to wait until 67 for it to be tax free
Turning 67 does not mean it is tax free. It just means that you aren't income limited so your disbursement can't be reduced. You can still be taxed on up to 85% of your SS disburesement depending on your AGI. (Maybe MAGI).
Posted on 3/26/25 at 10:09 am to VABuckeye
quote:
Turning 67 does not mean it is tax free. It just means that you aren't income limited so your disbursement can't be reduced. You can still be taxed on up to 85% of your SS disburesement depending on your AGI. (Maybe MAGI).
gotcha. i chose wrong words. i meant it will not be reduced based on my income.
sounds like i'm screwed until 67 now regardless. well at least i know now.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 10:12 am to Artificial Ignorance
66 years and 8 months.
Full retirement age.
Just applied for it.
Full retirement age.
Just applied for it.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 10:17 am to Fat Bastard
I'm stuck in the wait until 67 boat as well. My wife has a small bookkeeping business and is able to keep her reportable income below the $22320 threshhold. 
Posted on 3/26/25 at 10:59 am to VABuckeye
Me: 70
Wife: 62
Our reasoning is that if something happens to me, my wife will be eligible for my check amount. I want to make that amount as high as possible.
Wife: 62
Our reasoning is that if something happens to me, my wife will be eligible for my check amount. I want to make that amount as high as possible.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 11:05 am to Fat Bastard
quote:
almost look at SS as some type of bonus $$$
This is exactly how I am looking at it and am fortunate (plus hard work) to be able to.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 11:07 am to Artificial Ignorance
62. I’m retiring early and will make do on what is due me and leave retirement account alone as long as I can. I’d rather live my life bf turning elderly.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 11:58 am to Artificial Ignorance
quote:I took it at 70, wife took the spousal amount at 65 or 66 - whatever age it maxed out for her.
Me: 70 Wife: 62
Our reasoning is that if something happens to me, my wife will be eligible for my check amount. I want to make that amount as high as possible.
The idea above was one reason. We’re both healthy (as far as we know) and she will likely live into her 90s. I retired at about 65 and lived off savings for 5 years. Another reason for waiting was the market was flat when I retired and waiting to take SS had a built in 7-8% annual growth rate. And future COLAs would be based on larger current payments.
If either of us would have had a serious health issue we would not have waited. But, if making that decision today and given the current US debt amount I’m not sure I would wait. I don’t have as much faith in SS being there now as I did 11 years ago.
Popular
Back to top



0





