- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 30% of gross income for mortgage payment rule
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:23 am to GeauxTigers123
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:23 am to GeauxTigers123
I don't feel qualified to post in this thread because my life has been an unplanned series of risky home purchases that have paid off only because of the market where I live which is Nashville and Williamson county.
I understand the spirit of those suggestions to not be house-poor but if we hadn't taken a risk and bought in potentially sought after areas we would never have had the cash-out to keep moving up the ladder.
My house history in Nashville
- 1997 134k sold in 2001 for 150k
- 2001 234k sold in 2015 for 325k
- 2015 425k sold in 2021 for 1.6
- 2021 895k sold in 2024 for 850k
- 2024 825k (worth the hit we took because it came with a lake and 6 acres 15 minutes from downtown Nashville)
Our current house is already worth double what we paid and that's not a brag as much as it's just luck my wife is addicted to Zillow and picked this up right as the pending sale fell through and the seller was a relative of the woman who died who lived on the other side of the country and wanted a quick payday but left a couple hundred thousand on the table by not doing a few simple things.
So long story short the anomaly in the middle put us into a good position but without buying something I wasn't comfortable with financially we wouldn't have gotten the leverage to jump on an even better opportunity.
I understand the spirit of those suggestions to not be house-poor but if we hadn't taken a risk and bought in potentially sought after areas we would never have had the cash-out to keep moving up the ladder.
My house history in Nashville
- 1997 134k sold in 2001 for 150k
- 2001 234k sold in 2015 for 325k
- 2015 425k sold in 2021 for 1.6
- 2021 895k sold in 2024 for 850k
- 2024 825k (worth the hit we took because it came with a lake and 6 acres 15 minutes from downtown Nashville)
Our current house is already worth double what we paid and that's not a brag as much as it's just luck my wife is addicted to Zillow and picked this up right as the pending sale fell through and the seller was a relative of the woman who died who lived on the other side of the country and wanted a quick payday but left a couple hundred thousand on the table by not doing a few simple things.
So long story short the anomaly in the middle put us into a good position but without buying something I wasn't comfortable with financially we wouldn't have gotten the leverage to jump on an even better opportunity.
This post was edited on 3/16/26 at 6:27 am
Posted on 3/16/26 at 7:31 am to Yeti_Chaser
There is no perfect rule, just some general guidelines.
For many 25% of after tax income might be about perfect for mortggae/ins/tax/hoa; however it isnt perfect.
For the couple making $150k/yr or say about $10k/mo after taxes just to keep it somewhat simple; 25% of their monthly is $2,500/mo. For a couple with no debt, no kids/childcare cost; this would probably be EXTREMELY easy to stay within and have plenty leftover to do whatver with. So it seems like a very conservative rule.
Now take a couple making $150k/$10k/mo after taxes BUT they have 2 kids both in daycare and that costs $2.5k/mo. They also have student loans they pay $1k/mo on. They also have a car loan for another $500/mo. They have gotten into some credit card debt as well for $20k where minimum is $600/mo.
So now they have $2.1k/mo in debt obligations, $2.5k/mo in childcare obligations; so they have $4.6k in fixed costs in stuff the first couple doesnt even have to worry about.
$2,500/mo on housing actually seems somewhat difficult in that scenario when nearly $5k is already accounted for in childcare/debt costs each month. So the 25% rule might not really work for them, and that is a pretty conservative rule.
Everybody has different scenarios so 1 thing is not necessarily 1 size fits at all even if it seems very conservative.
Dave Ramsey's 25% of take home pay but on a 15 year note is one of the more out of touch things that hasnt been adjusted and should have a while back. I know the guy doesnt want people in debt but when you math everything out with the huge increases in home values and higher rates now basically no one can afford the house they would want unless you live severely under your means.
For many 25% of after tax income might be about perfect for mortggae/ins/tax/hoa; however it isnt perfect.
For the couple making $150k/yr or say about $10k/mo after taxes just to keep it somewhat simple; 25% of their monthly is $2,500/mo. For a couple with no debt, no kids/childcare cost; this would probably be EXTREMELY easy to stay within and have plenty leftover to do whatver with. So it seems like a very conservative rule.
Now take a couple making $150k/$10k/mo after taxes BUT they have 2 kids both in daycare and that costs $2.5k/mo. They also have student loans they pay $1k/mo on. They also have a car loan for another $500/mo. They have gotten into some credit card debt as well for $20k where minimum is $600/mo.
So now they have $2.1k/mo in debt obligations, $2.5k/mo in childcare obligations; so they have $4.6k in fixed costs in stuff the first couple doesnt even have to worry about.
$2,500/mo on housing actually seems somewhat difficult in that scenario when nearly $5k is already accounted for in childcare/debt costs each month. So the 25% rule might not really work for them, and that is a pretty conservative rule.
Everybody has different scenarios so 1 thing is not necessarily 1 size fits at all even if it seems very conservative.
Dave Ramsey's 25% of take home pay but on a 15 year note is one of the more out of touch things that hasnt been adjusted and should have a while back. I know the guy doesnt want people in debt but when you math everything out with the huge increases in home values and higher rates now basically no one can afford the house they would want unless you live severely under your means.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 7:41 am to Yeti_Chaser
Gotta remember, the people who write these rules (similar to a bank saying you can afford $X amount of house) are working for entities that have a set % of write offs baked into their calculation. They anticipate some % of these loans to fail. Just because the other % doesn't fail doesn't mean they're not 1 struggling or 2 going to fail the next year or the one after etc.
For you as an individual, you should not be anywhere near the mortgage lenders max estimate, as that puts you right up near the edge of failure where if anything goes wrong you could be set back significantly, and even if nothing goes wrong your only investment ends up being your house.
My wife and I are paying just under 20% of our gross into a mortgage, and I'm not super thrilled with that as is. Every 1% less from that 30 or 20 or whatever "magical" % is another % you could be saving or investing into something else.
For you as an individual, you should not be anywhere near the mortgage lenders max estimate, as that puts you right up near the edge of failure where if anything goes wrong you could be set back significantly, and even if nothing goes wrong your only investment ends up being your house.
My wife and I are paying just under 20% of our gross into a mortgage, and I'm not super thrilled with that as is. Every 1% less from that 30 or 20 or whatever "magical" % is another % you could be saving or investing into something else.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 8:52 am to Yeti_Chaser
quote:
we don't even have kids yet
Be sure to plan for future daycare costs and/or lack of wife’s salary. Math don’t math for us with daycare costs
Posted on 3/16/26 at 12:02 pm to Yeti_Chaser
We spend about 31% of our take home pay on our mortgage, insurance, taxes, and utilities and it feels very high. I could not imagine spending anymore than that and am thankful I do not have to.. Could not imagine 30% of our gross income.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 12:23 pm to TheJunction
quote:
We spend about 31% of our take home pay on our mortgage, insurance, taxes, and utilities and it feels very high. I could not imagine spending anymore than that and am thankful I do not have to.. Could not imagine 30% of our gross income.
We are around 20% of take home and I'm actually surprised it is that much. If we bought the same house at today's prices/rates...I would probably be pushing 30% of take home.
Our monthly escrow has gone up $800/month from insurance and taxes alone since purchasing.
This post was edited on 3/16/26 at 12:24 pm
Posted on 3/16/26 at 12:45 pm to TheJunction
Ours is 13-14% of net income. Closer to 10% of gross.
We bought this house 13 years ago when we made a good bit less money and also had kids in private school. Then we refinanced at 2.3% during Covid. Now we no longer have the private school expense, and our household income has gone up a good bit.
We have no plans to move though. We like our neighborhood. We'll be empty nesters pretty soon and the house is a little big for 2 people, but it would cost us more to downsize.
We bought this house 13 years ago when we made a good bit less money and also had kids in private school. Then we refinanced at 2.3% during Covid. Now we no longer have the private school expense, and our household income has gone up a good bit.
We have no plans to move though. We like our neighborhood. We'll be empty nesters pretty soon and the house is a little big for 2 people, but it would cost us more to downsize.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 1:02 pm to Yeti_Chaser
I would be petrified. Our payment and escrow is about 12%, we pay another 5% in extra. I don’t know how 30% is the rule. But if you earn 7-8k a month 2100 is probably the best you can do in some areas.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 1:12 pm to Yeti_Chaser
IMO, a home is the most important purchase of your entire life. Whatever amount you dedicate to this mortgage payment needs to be directly proportional to how important home life is for you and your family. If you would rather spend your time traveling, or not at home, then yeah sure try not to spend too much on it.
I live on 10 acres in the woods. We love our little place away from the madness of life. Our home is everything to us, our pride and joy. I would have dedicated up to probably 35-40% of my income to my home if I could go back.
Invest in your life, fellas.
I live on 10 acres in the woods. We love our little place away from the madness of life. Our home is everything to us, our pride and joy. I would have dedicated up to probably 35-40% of my income to my home if I could go back.
Invest in your life, fellas.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 1:21 pm to fallguy_1978
quote:
We have no plans to move though.
You were very open about the increase of crime in BR and were very open about moving 5 or so years ago. Just curious about what changed for you?
Posted on 3/16/26 at 1:22 pm to Yeti_Chaser
Monthly mortgage payment is 7.8% of gross, 16% of net pay.
Saving money on home payments is one of the most straightforward tickets to financial security.
Saving money on home payments is one of the most straightforward tickets to financial security.
This post was edited on 3/16/26 at 1:24 pm
Posted on 3/16/26 at 1:23 pm to CAD703X
quote:
30% of gross income for mortgage payment rule
Brought to you by the same people who recommend saving six months of income for an engagement ring.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 2:05 pm to Paul Allen
My wife doesn't want to move because she likes her job and the kids are here.
She lost both of her parents in the past few years so pretty much all of her family that's left is here.
I changed jobs a few years ago and could likely see myself staying there the rest of my career. It's somewhat of a unique situation that I'd have a hard time replacing.
She lost both of her parents in the past few years so pretty much all of her family that's left is here.
I changed jobs a few years ago and could likely see myself staying there the rest of my career. It's somewhat of a unique situation that I'd have a hard time replacing.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 2:27 pm to Yeti_Chaser
quote:
So what do yall usually recommend for a housing budget?
I'd recommend calculating a housing budget:
- start with take home pay (make sure all retirement and savings have been removed to get to this number)
- determine and subtract monthly budget for food, vehicles, travel, clothes, subscriptions, etc.
- determine and subtract how much discretionary spending/cash you want available each month
- What you have left is what you can comfortably put towards mortgage, property taxes, utilities, home repairs, home maintenance, hoa dues and home insurance.
The percentage recommendations just dont make any sense. Everyone has different spending priorities.
This post was edited on 3/16/26 at 2:32 pm
Posted on 3/16/26 at 4:19 pm to CAD703X
Did you pay cash in 2024? You got extremely lucky in one house netting over a mil but that was luck. Then you took 100k hit in the other deals and if you have a mortgage that 6ish % compared to 3ish % is going eat a lot into that one time profit you made. Look at me I bought the cheapest house in the neighborhood I wanted with a great lot fixed up the house and could sell for 600-700k profit today. But again I don’t plan on selling until I retire and move to my retirement house. Already bought and paying for now so that will be paid off when I retire
Posted on 3/16/26 at 4:42 pm to AkronTiger
quote:
Saving money on home payments is one of the most straightforward tickets to financial security.
While I don't disagree with your statement, I believe saving money on car payments is more important. At least your home is going up in value.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 4:53 pm to notsince98
quote:
I'd recommend calculating a housing budget:
- start with take home pay (make sure all retirement and savings have been removed to get to this number)
You make it sound easy. So right now we each max our roth, HSA, and put enough to get the full match + another $5-6k/year in the 401k. After the match this works out to ~$61k/yr into tax advantaged accounts. We then take another $10k/year to put in short-term investments in a taxable brokerage for future car purchases or whatever big items come up. 6 month emergency fund is stocked in a HYSA but our jobs are pretty stable so sometimes we will invest 3 months of it if a good deal comes along and then build it back up.
The bold part is what I struggle with. I don't know when enough saving is enough
Posted on 3/16/26 at 5:14 pm to Yeti_Chaser
You may pay a lot of money to hop from house to house every 6 to 8- years between commissions, moving expenses, and getting the place fixed up to suit your needs.
We stayed in our first house a little longer than we preferred, due to our income and a personal desire to live in a substantially better place, not just a modest improvement in housing. The patience paid off. In early 2000, interest rates were between 4 and 5 percent, and knowing we wanted to move in a short time, it made the most sense to throw extra money at the mortgage to earn a better interest rate on our savings (a rate higher than the money market rates we could otherwise get). We probably paid off that house in about 2003.
We then bought 5 acres and planned to build on it, but did not like how the development was shaping up and sold it for a small profit and continued to save money. When we finally saw a great home and pulled the trigger,. The starter home my wife bought on her own before we were married was paid off, and we had a good chunk of money in the bank.
It was a little scary, and interest was in the low 6% range when we took out a mortgage of about 25% of our income. But we bought a house we really love that we can age in (great bones, master on main, good neighborhood) and that worked well. (June of 2006 towards the top of the market)
We financed as a 30 and paid it off in 12 years back in 2018. It was nice not having a mortgage to worry about when the market tanked in the early COVID years, and some jobs were on the chopping block. I kept pushing money into investment accounts even with 60 percent of our company furloughed for 8 months.
From the time we purchased this home until it was paid off, I refinanced about 6 or more times as rates fell, and it was very inexpensive to do so with the bank I used. Each time I did this, I had paid down substantial principal since the previous loan, and as our wages rose and the financed principal dropped, the mortgage-to-income ratio improved.
If we had needed to scale back during the payoff period, having a house payment that was 20 percent or 15 percent of take home would have made that much easier to deal with in case of a job loss or disability, etc.
We stayed in our first house a little longer than we preferred, due to our income and a personal desire to live in a substantially better place, not just a modest improvement in housing. The patience paid off. In early 2000, interest rates were between 4 and 5 percent, and knowing we wanted to move in a short time, it made the most sense to throw extra money at the mortgage to earn a better interest rate on our savings (a rate higher than the money market rates we could otherwise get). We probably paid off that house in about 2003.
We then bought 5 acres and planned to build on it, but did not like how the development was shaping up and sold it for a small profit and continued to save money. When we finally saw a great home and pulled the trigger,. The starter home my wife bought on her own before we were married was paid off, and we had a good chunk of money in the bank.
It was a little scary, and interest was in the low 6% range when we took out a mortgage of about 25% of our income. But we bought a house we really love that we can age in (great bones, master on main, good neighborhood) and that worked well. (June of 2006 towards the top of the market)
We financed as a 30 and paid it off in 12 years back in 2018. It was nice not having a mortgage to worry about when the market tanked in the early COVID years, and some jobs were on the chopping block. I kept pushing money into investment accounts even with 60 percent of our company furloughed for 8 months.
From the time we purchased this home until it was paid off, I refinanced about 6 or more times as rates fell, and it was very inexpensive to do so with the bank I used. Each time I did this, I had paid down substantial principal since the previous loan, and as our wages rose and the financed principal dropped, the mortgage-to-income ratio improved.
If we had needed to scale back during the payoff period, having a house payment that was 20 percent or 15 percent of take home would have made that much easier to deal with in case of a job loss or disability, etc.
This post was edited on 3/16/26 at 5:34 pm
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:29 pm to Yeti_Chaser
I think 25% is more reasonable for a young buyer starting out, especially if they are single or single income, and ESPECIALLY with any kids.
But even a two income family is better off buying small and saving than living at the limit, because the emotional tax on being on the verge of broke is greater than the reduction in lifestyle of a smaller abode.
We bought our third home in 1979 at 10.5 % interest (thank you Mr. Carter) and that was a total payment (p and i, plue taxes and insurance) of under 25% of my gross income, but I had two kids and one in a private school so it was still to much house for comfort. 30% is crazy to me, even at less than 5% interest.
But even a two income family is better off buying small and saving than living at the limit, because the emotional tax on being on the verge of broke is greater than the reduction in lifestyle of a smaller abode.
We bought our third home in 1979 at 10.5 % interest (thank you Mr. Carter) and that was a total payment (p and i, plue taxes and insurance) of under 25% of my gross income, but I had two kids and one in a private school so it was still to much house for comfort. 30% is crazy to me, even at less than 5% interest.
This post was edited on 3/16/26 at 6:31 pm
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:57 pm to Yeti_Chaser
quote:
The bold part is what I struggle with. I don't know when enough saving is enough
Enough for what, when and for how long? Answer that in your financial plan to get you a clear answer.
We lived on 80% of our means across 30 yr career and 50-60% last 1/4 of career. Why? To build financial engine that produced lifestyle we wanted when we wanted it (early retirement) for as long as we wanted it (God willing) at Trinity rule (4%). The savings question was answered by the financial objective. For example only.
Financial math was the easy part.
This post was edited on 3/16/26 at 7:21 pm
Popular
Back to top



2








