- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Zone blocking destroyed LSU Offense
Posted on 12/10/09 at 8:26 am to Tigerstudent08
Posted on 12/10/09 at 8:26 am to Tigerstudent08
quote:
Can someone show me a video of him getting pushed on his back and his guy making a play?
No, his guy did not make the play, but T-Bob is on his back before the ball is even handed off. LINK
The O-line just had no muscle. I think most opposing D-lines lines out-weighed them and pushed them around. Not sure how much was scheme or just getting physically outmatched.
Posted on 12/10/09 at 8:26 am to athletemed
I agree that Hebert got beat on some plays in the Ole Miss '09 game. However, when you have the time, review the '08 Ole Miss game as well. Hebert wasn't a part of the '08 Ole Miss struggle. Now, what is your point?
Posted on 12/10/09 at 9:09 am to pilsnerpusher
quote:
The biggest change I saw was that we ran a bunch more zone option. that was the slow developing option that everybody hated. JJ didn't seem to see it very well.
Maybe when they said we were going to more zone they meant outside zone (scheme used on zone option) instead of a traditional pin and pull series (basic OL rules - if down block take it if not pull).
I'm certainly not an o-line technician, so thanks for the education. It would seem to me that part of the problem this year were the playcalls that came in so late. It looked like to me blocking calls were being made with 2 seconds left on the play clock, which really gives the lineman no time to assess the d before the play begins.
Posted on 12/10/09 at 9:33 am to south bama tiger
quote:
we had switched to zone blocking this year
The zone blocking scheme has been a part of EVERY major college offense since the late 90s. The difference is that you do not have a single man to block, but rather an area to block him in. Its common from D-1A all the way to D-III. High Schools started adopting it for years. Remeber the Broncos' run of great runners? They run a zone blocking scheme, and its pretty effective. Not a spread offense either. Before you post that something "destroyed" an offense, educate yourself.
Posted on 12/10/09 at 9:50 am to mikedatyger
If you pull your blocker down with you doesn't that have the same effect as a pancake block?
Posted on 12/10/09 at 9:51 am to south bama tiger
quote:
they employed a new blocking scheme called "T-Bob gets pancaked every play" OR "T-Bob runs downfield aimlessly" something was seriously awry this year.
Zone blocking didn't have anything to do with it. The quality of the 3 interior offensive linemen had everything to do with it. The above observation is accurate.
Posted on 12/10/09 at 10:21 am to mrbayoublu
i will post a description of what each is tonight. and zone blocking is a great scheme and wasn't our problem this year. our problem is that we tried to use both angle and zone this year and were not very good at either. we didnt have the size to us angle blocking this year and our technique especially footwork was terrible on the zone blocking schemes. anyways i will try to post up more later.
Posted on 12/10/09 at 3:30 pm to lsu777
I don't know if it was T-Bob's fault, or the scheme that was called on the plays where he looked lost or out of position...and its obvious that he didn't suck every play, i was just making an over-gerneralization of what seemed to be a recurring problem this past season.
I watched several games twice and often watch our offensive plays in slo-mo (to avoid doing homework). Our running game was hampered by the fact that our backs were first contacted in the backfield, before they could get a full head of steam going (often right after they took the handoff). This was caused by our interior linemen being beaten at the point of attack.
Im sure T-Bob is an awesome kid, but when I watch him whiff, get knocked down, and stand around and not block anyone while a linebacker runs past him into the backfield, I question both his ability to perform at this level, and the ability of our coaches to put him in a position to succeed.
I watched several games twice and often watch our offensive plays in slo-mo (to avoid doing homework). Our running game was hampered by the fact that our backs were first contacted in the backfield, before they could get a full head of steam going (often right after they took the handoff). This was caused by our interior linemen being beaten at the point of attack.
Im sure T-Bob is an awesome kid, but when I watch him whiff, get knocked down, and stand around and not block anyone while a linebacker runs past him into the backfield, I question both his ability to perform at this level, and the ability of our coaches to put him in a position to succeed.
Posted on 12/10/09 at 4:00 pm to jmitc22
Funny how people single out T-Bob but there isnt much mention of the AWEFUL season Hitt had. His own brother owned him.
Posted on 12/10/09 at 4:05 pm to south bama tiger
Zone blocking could be the answer why we were bad at OLINE. Our OLINE at 2 positions was too small to zone block.I was wondering why we didn't trap or cross block, and we did little pulling of the Guards.
Posted on 12/10/09 at 5:33 pm to Catman88
quote:
... there isn't much mention of the AWFUL season Hitt had.
I've actually felt bad for him the last 2 years. He's never really looked/seemed comfortable playing on the O line. I know that he was a D tackle in HS, and was moved to offense after starting out on D, but I just don't know if he's any better now than 2 years ago. I'm going to have to guess that scheme/technique was more of the issue for ALL 3 guys in the middle. More (or less) coaching than the players themselves.
Posted on 12/10/09 at 6:15 pm to Leonides
quote:
My personal opinion is that LSU did not play its most talented players on the interior of the line.
I agree that the guard position could have been upgraded with the play of Hurst and Blackwell. I'd like to see those guys start at guard next year. They are huge!
I was listening to the Ole Miss-LSU game on the radio, and they mentioned how big Bobbie Massie (freshman RT I think for Miss) was. One the next offensive series for LSU, they mentioned how Alex Hurst was even bigger than Massie! With a few personal changes, our line could be one of the bigger o-lines in the country.
Posted on 12/11/09 at 12:27 pm to mikedatyger
Just noticed in the linked photo
that there are nine OM players at the LOS.
pilsnerpusher - you seem to have some good insight on blocking schemes, etc. Thanks for the post. Would appreciate if you would weigh-in on what changed between '07 and '08 (where for the most part we ran effectively) and '09. Do you attribute the decline to personnel, blocking schemes, play calling or what. Again - appreciate your post.
that there are nine OM players at the LOS.
pilsnerpusher - you seem to have some good insight on blocking schemes, etc. Thanks for the post. Would appreciate if you would weigh-in on what changed between '07 and '08 (where for the most part we ran effectively) and '09. Do you attribute the decline to personnel, blocking schemes, play calling or what. Again - appreciate your post.
Posted on 12/12/09 at 1:18 pm to AlwysATgr
My opinion is that it was a combination of things:
1. only slightly above average OL
2. our skill player blocking was down a little this year
3. young QB that was not always able to get us out of bad plays at the line of scrimmage. the look mode was intended to alleviate this but they'd either not show anything (keep their 2 high shell) and roll safeties post snap or they'd show one thing and change when we changed.
4. I think we had some tendency issues based on personnel and formations. every offense has tendencies but I think the compartmentalization of our offense based on which RB was in the game allowed opposing DCs to hone in on our tendencies more than other opponents. having said that, as long as you have a hat for a hat and can execute it doesn't matter if they know what's coming. USC knew the power play was coming when they played stanford and stanford had run it 4 times in a row. they still couldn't stop it. breaking tendencies is nice but if you can get into a good play vs. what you are seeing and then you can have 11 guys execute that play then it won't matter.
if you combine all of these then you end up with the 108th offense in college football. If #1 and #2 are better then it takes pressure off #3 and #4. you can cram the ball down people's throats and just tell your QB to run the play unless you see one high or no high safeties then check play action.
If #3 and #4 are better then it takes pressure off #1 and #2. that is why teams with lesser talent can execute and score points against more talented defenses.
In 07 we had a great OL, great skill player blocking, a savvy QB that got us in and out of plays at the LOS. We were still kind of tendency oriented but like I said if you have 11 guys that can execute and a QB that can skillfully get you in and out of plays at the LOS then it doesn't matter.
just my opinion.
1. only slightly above average OL
2. our skill player blocking was down a little this year
3. young QB that was not always able to get us out of bad plays at the line of scrimmage. the look mode was intended to alleviate this but they'd either not show anything (keep their 2 high shell) and roll safeties post snap or they'd show one thing and change when we changed.
4. I think we had some tendency issues based on personnel and formations. every offense has tendencies but I think the compartmentalization of our offense based on which RB was in the game allowed opposing DCs to hone in on our tendencies more than other opponents. having said that, as long as you have a hat for a hat and can execute it doesn't matter if they know what's coming. USC knew the power play was coming when they played stanford and stanford had run it 4 times in a row. they still couldn't stop it. breaking tendencies is nice but if you can get into a good play vs. what you are seeing and then you can have 11 guys execute that play then it won't matter.
if you combine all of these then you end up with the 108th offense in college football. If #1 and #2 are better then it takes pressure off #3 and #4. you can cram the ball down people's throats and just tell your QB to run the play unless you see one high or no high safeties then check play action.
If #3 and #4 are better then it takes pressure off #1 and #2. that is why teams with lesser talent can execute and score points against more talented defenses.
In 07 we had a great OL, great skill player blocking, a savvy QB that got us in and out of plays at the LOS. We were still kind of tendency oriented but like I said if you have 11 guys that can execute and a QB that can skillfully get you in and out of plays at the LOS then it doesn't matter.
just my opinion.
This post was edited on 12/12/09 at 1:32 pm
Posted on 12/12/09 at 1:29 pm to Tigerstudent08
Tigerstudent08, so two plays all season he showed up are all that matters? Here's one. It's the hailmary against OleMiss.
How about this swandive by T-Bob?
LINK
How about this swandive by T-Bob?
LINK
Posted on 12/12/09 at 1:29 pm to pilsnerpusher
as for 2008 I thought JL was fine at getting us in and out of plays. his issues were post snap. once people realized that he had completely lost confidence in being able to execute any post snap reads they stacked the box and forced him to throw. because his confidence was shot we were relegated to throwing a wr quick, a screen, or a roll out with very simple reads. defenses forced us into these situations and played our tendencies.
Posted on 12/12/09 at 1:31 pm to pilsnerpusher
stud needs togo bottem line
Posted on 12/12/09 at 1:37 pm to WHS
I thought he was gone. Miles needs to go after Hevesy at MS State. I've seen that guy work. He's awesome. intense, intelligent, detail oriented, and he makes his players believe.
His results are hard to discount too. took a line that performed so-so fro j.b. grimes and turned them into a machine.
His results are hard to discount too. took a line that performed so-so fro j.b. grimes and turned them into a machine.
Posted on 12/12/09 at 1:50 pm to LSUMafia
LSU Mafia. The video link of Shepard's run had nothing to do with T-Bob. Shepard ran between Dworaczyk who had replaced Black on that play and Blackwell was at guard in place of Dworaczky.The other run by Scott was off of a block again by Blackwell and the TE.T-Bob was mainly a spectator, particularly on Shepard's run.
This post was edited on 12/12/09 at 1:55 pm
Posted on 12/12/09 at 1:58 pm to aglandry
Aglandry, I am agreeing with you. My point was Landry posting those as having no evidence of T-Bob getting burned all season. I posted one he got burned on that had a potential game changing effect.
That said, the guy is young and coming off an ACL injury. My guess is he hasn't been able to strengthen up as much as is needed given that.
That said, the guy is young and coming off an ACL injury. My guess is he hasn't been able to strengthen up as much as is needed given that.
Popular
Back to top



2




