- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Would a new ruling negating a review when a player goes down with an injury…
Posted on 10/13/24 at 8:42 am to Hangover Haven
Posted on 10/13/24 at 8:42 am to Hangover Haven
I want that time out back
0
Posted on 10/13/24 at 8:43 am to Salviati
quote:
I keep seeing people say "series" but "possession" would be better. If the "injured" player's team gets a first down on the next play, can the "injured" go back in? frick that. Player can go back in next possession, not next series. If possession is too long for you, perhaps four plays or possession, whichever is shorter.
It’s not an onerous enough punishment for cheating. And really just takes away from the player. They typically do it with lineman that rotate anyway.
Posted on 10/13/24 at 8:46 am to TaderSalad
Call it the Kiffin rule or the Hotty Toddy rule !!
Posted on 10/13/24 at 8:47 am to Hangover Haven
Calling for an entire possession, quarter, etc, seems a bit much to me. There are games in the past in which we wouldn’t have been able to field an offensive side due to cramps.
I think one play for a contact injury and three plays for a non contact injury would be a reasonable balance, with unsportsmanlike penalties for clear “walking around fine and drop to the ground on a signal” bullshite.
I think one play for a contact injury and three plays for a non contact injury would be a reasonable balance, with unsportsmanlike penalties for clear “walking around fine and drop to the ground on a signal” bullshite.
Posted on 10/13/24 at 8:48 am to Honkus
quote:
if they have to stop the flow of the game for your "injured" arse, then you sit the rest of the series.
This sounds great until it’s someone like Nuss that has to sit out a series because he came up gimpy on a play
Posted on 10/13/24 at 8:50 am to TaderSalad
quote:I'd say several series, maybe a quarter.
Non-contact “injury” and player must sit out the remainder of the series as those are generally serious or faked.
Again, you're talking non-contact, a person is just standing or walking and then randomly collapses. In regular life, that gets you a trip to the ER, you might be having a seizure etc. If someone does that during a game, they need to be evaluated
Posted on 10/13/24 at 8:54 am to Scoob
quote:
I'd say several series, maybe a quarter. Again, you're talking non-contact, a person is just standing or walking and then randomly collapses. In regular life, that gets you a trip to the ER, you might be having a seizure etc. If someone does that during a game, they need to be evaluated
What if they are walking fine, but pull up with a cramp? Or they are limping towards the sideline and then sit because they won’t make it off before a delay of game penalty?
As much as I hate the fake injury bullshite, we shouldn’t throw the baby out with the bath water by forcing stars to sit out chunks of games. Literally no one actually wants that in practice.
Posted on 10/13/24 at 8:55 am to Hangover Haven
Just take away timeouts
Posted on 10/13/24 at 9:03 am to Hangover Haven
Nobody wants to hear this, but the only time they unequivocally faked an injury was when we were trying to rush the snap after Caden’s knee hit the ground 10 yards behind where he was called down. They were negating our cheesy bullshite with their own cheesy bullshite.
There were a couple other ones that were dubious, and if you want to claim them then I’m not going to stop you, but the only one that was not debatable was done to buy time for the refs to (correctly!) review a spot.
There were a couple other ones that were dubious, and if you want to claim them then I’m not going to stop you, but the only one that was not debatable was done to buy time for the refs to (correctly!) review a spot.
Posted on 10/13/24 at 9:05 am to Scoob
quote:
I'd say several series, maybe a quarter.
Just consider that the refs will screw us eventually so, do we want to lose Weeks for a quarter if the Tuscaloosa booster makes a phone call?
Posted on 10/13/24 at 9:07 am to OKBoomerSooner
quote:
There were a couple other ones that were dubious, and if you want to claim them then I’m not going to stop you, but the only one that was not debatable was done to buy time for the refs to (correctly!) review a spot.
which should cost them 15 yards. They faked an injury to avoid us getting a snap off. That’s unsportsmanlike and should be called.
Posted on 10/13/24 at 9:08 am to Hangover Haven
Each injury should burn a timeout.
That would stop some of the fake shite from happening real quick.
That would stop some of the fake shite from happening real quick.
Posted on 10/13/24 at 9:11 am to 0x15E
Anyone got a GIF on f the last fake injury. Ole boy was standing there, looks At the sideline, then just drops to the ground.
Posted on 10/13/24 at 9:14 am to OceanMan
Personally I think it should be defensive delay of game and a reviewable call.
Posted on 10/13/24 at 9:16 am to Salviati
quote:
I keep seeing people say "series" but "possession" would be better. If the "injured" player's team gets a first down on the next play, can the "injured" go back in? frick that.
“Possession” is what they mean when they say “series”.
Posted on 10/13/24 at 9:20 am to Oilfieldbiology
How about a penalty box for 2.00 minutes. If he he is ready after 2.00 minutes I'm okay with that. If he is really injured then it's up to the trainers to say he is ready. Coaches will think twice if it's a good player that goes down for a fake injury. Im okay with the taking him out for that series but series can last 7 or 8 minutes
Posted on 10/13/24 at 9:24 am to OKBoomerSooner
quote:
Personally I think it should be defensive delay of game and a reviewable call.
I agree it should be a penalty. Unsportsmanlike, illegal substitution or delay.
Posted on 10/13/24 at 9:25 am to Hangover Haven
As others have said. If you go down for an "injury" you have to sit out the rest of the series. That will be the only way you actually put a stop to the nonsense.
Posted on 10/13/24 at 9:28 am to Scoob
No other sport stops play for injuries during gameplay, and that’s real injuries.
They don’t stop a basketball game in the last minute b/c someone is hurt.
They don’t stop in soccer either.
You get hurt, oh well. Call a timeout or take a penalty.
The only reason they should stop is if the injury happened with the contact of the play and the player is down immediately and there’s already a natural stop in play. Once everyone is lining up there’s no more stopping for “injuries”.
They don’t stop a basketball game in the last minute b/c someone is hurt.
They don’t stop in soccer either.
You get hurt, oh well. Call a timeout or take a penalty.
The only reason they should stop is if the injury happened with the contact of the play and the player is down immediately and there’s already a natural stop in play. Once everyone is lining up there’s no more stopping for “injuries”.
Posted on 10/13/24 at 9:31 am to cajunjoey2010
Some of you expressing your righeous indignation should remember Lacy and Penn were legitimately injured last night and recturned to the field in a couple of plays, but would have to sit out considerably longer with your suggestions.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News