7
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Will the State Judge ever weigh in on Sankey’s contempt?
Posted on 9/10/26 at 7:39 pm
Posted on 9/10/26 at 7:39 pm
Subsequent threats (game of chicken) against LSU if it rostered the players is contrary to the State judge’s order.
Posted on 9/10/26 at 7:42 pm to HEtiger
It is all “moot”!
Posted on 9/10/26 at 7:45 pm to HEtiger
My bet is this happens the moment the SEC tries to do something through conference bylaws.
He was going to let the federal suit play out because the conference is losing that one in every single timeline.
He was going to let the federal suit play out because the conference is losing that one in every single timeline.
This post was edited on 9/10/26 at 8:05 pm
Posted on 9/10/26 at 7:45 pm to HEtiger
A party has to ask him to. The excluded players will do so unless some kind of settlement is reached beforehand, which will involve the SEC paying them.
The SEC absolutely violated the TRO. Obviously, LSU filled the open roster spots with other players due to the threat of expulsion by the SEC. If it comes down to it, LSU officials would have to testify to that.
But settlement is almost certainly already being discussed. The expulsion BS goes away for LSU (it already did), the SEC gets its way with leaving these players out, the players get a check and sign an NDA.
The SEC absolutely violated the TRO. Obviously, LSU filled the open roster spots with other players due to the threat of expulsion by the SEC. If it comes down to it, LSU officials would have to testify to that.
But settlement is almost certainly already being discussed. The expulsion BS goes away for LSU (it already did), the SEC gets its way with leaving these players out, the players get a check and sign an NDA.
This post was edited on 9/10/26 at 7:51 pm
Posted on 9/10/26 at 7:50 pm to Epaminondas
quote:
Obviously, LSU filled the open roster spots with other players due to the threat of expulsion by the SEC.
Doesn't Rousse's letter claim the exact opposite?
And does the TRO even apply until the players are rostered?
Posted on 9/10/26 at 7:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
And does the TRO even apply until the players are rostered?
The players and LSU can easily argue they would’ve been rostered had the SEC not threatened 50% of payout, LK suspensions, expulsion, etc.
Let’s go to court and have Sankey explain why this case rose to the level of expulsion while Bedaiko, Chambliss, Paiva, Hutson were ignored.
Get Sankey back in BR to testify, make it happen Tony the rabbit not only has the Gun you have the might of the Speaker of the House behind you.
Posted on 9/10/26 at 7:56 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
And does the TRO even apply until the players are rostered?
Lmao dude…
The TRO applies more than ever atp. They literally took action preventing the players from playing. This is precisely what they were instructed not to do, and the federal suit is not going to protect them.
The players can now prove damages if that’s the route they decide to go. And it sounds like the players are pursuing legal action against the SEC.
I assure you the players’ suits reference the TRO.
This post was edited on 9/10/26 at 7:58 pm
Posted on 9/10/26 at 8:00 pm to DeathByTossDive226
quote:
The players can now prove damages if that’s the route they decide to go. And it sounds like the players are pursuing legal action against the SEC.
Agree, and if I’m Tony the more I think about this it’s $100M minimum now to settle. Make it hurt the SEC institutions and see the folly of following a feckless leader like Stankey and agreeing with dimwit woke bitch celebrating Kirk’s assassination.
Posted on 9/10/26 at 8:36 pm to HEtiger
I think we'd realistically need to file a motion for contempt.
Posted on 9/11/26 at 6:53 am to DeathByTossDive226
quote:
They literally took action preventing the players from playin
Didn't LSU make the decision on this prior to these threats (expulsion, etc)?
Didn't Rouse confirm that in his letter?
This post was edited on 9/11/26 at 6:54 am
Posted on 9/11/26 at 6:54 am to Geauxldilocks
quote:
Agree, and if I’m Tony the more I think about this it’s $100M minimum now to settle
Posted on 9/11/26 at 7:12 am to SlowFlowPro
With as many takes as you give - how are they all so bad?
Posted on 9/11/26 at 7:19 am to Nevada_Tiger
quote:
With as many takes as you give - how are they all so bad?
Not being emotional-irrational in a sea of emotions creates that appearance
Posted on 9/11/26 at 7:26 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Not being emotional-irrational in a sea of emotions creates that appearance
No, you're just a fricking idiot.
Posted on 9/11/26 at 7:31 am to Epaminondas
quote:
settlement is almost certainly already being discussed. The expulsion BS goes away for LSU (it already did), the SEC gets its way with leaving these players out, the players get a check and sign an NDA.
This almost certainly how it will Go.
The SEC will pay them and it will all quietly go away because they aren’t allowed to talk as a term of the settlement.
Posted on 9/11/26 at 7:38 am to Epaminondas
quote:
But settlement is almost certainly already being discussed. The expulsion BS goes away for LSU (it already did), the SEC gets its way with leaving these players out, the players get a check and sign an NDA.
Agree this is most likely but the SEC is going to have to throw a ridiculous amount of money at these young men because they will threaten to walk away and begin the discovery phase if they don’t. I promise you the SEC does not want that lawsuit to go to discovery.
Posted on 9/11/26 at 7:38 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
And does the TRO even apply until the players are rostered?
Let’s go to court and find out.
Posted on 9/11/26 at 7:43 am to SlowFlowPro
Rational has been thrown so far out the window it ain't funny and Sanky and the SEC did it
LSU decided not to roster the players, sanky knew it and webt ahead and amended the federal suit to include something KIFFEN said to a reporter
the letter Rouse supplied to sanky is evidence shows LSU complied shite they were threatened with being expelled, all the while texas, missouri. arkansas all had roster players that didn't make a NFL
roster
The only rational people in my opinion is LSU and the 2 players who are now gonna sue either/or sanky or the sec or both
LSU decided not to roster the players, sanky knew it and webt ahead and amended the federal suit to include something KIFFEN said to a reporter
the letter Rouse supplied to sanky is evidence shows LSU complied shite they were threatened with being expelled, all the while texas, missouri. arkansas all had roster players that didn't make a NFL
roster
The only rational people in my opinion is LSU and the 2 players who are now gonna sue either/or sanky or the sec or both
Posted on 9/11/26 at 7:52 am to ole man
quote:
LSU decided not to roster the players, sanky knew it and webt ahead and amended the federal suit to include something KIFFEN said to a reporter
Your statement of the facts means there is no argument that the threats in the suit caused LSU to act in any way, because LSU had already made the choice prior to the threats.
The players will have to argue these threats caused them harm by forcing LSU not to roster them. LSU has stated publicly the decision was made prior to these threats.
This post was edited on 9/11/26 at 7:53 am
Posted on 9/11/26 at 7:53 am to XbengalTiger
quote:
you're just a fricking idiot.
At least you didn't say "your"
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News