0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/11/26 at 8:05 am to HEtiger
He is most likely waiting for the Federal case to be ruled on before moving forward. That case has to play out before the LA case advances.
This post was edited on 9/11/26 at 8:06 am
Posted on 9/11/26 at 8:39 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Your statement of the facts means there is no argument that the threats in the suit caused LSU to act in any way, because LSU had already made the choice prior to the threats.
You either don’t understand the timeline of events, or you are pretending not to understand the timeline of events.
Posted on 9/11/26 at 8:42 am to HEtiger
Civil or criminal?
Posted on 9/11/26 at 8:45 am to SlowFlowPro
the deadline was midnight friday to finalize the roster LSU did that, and advised sanky of that,
LSU was protecting LSU, as would ANY other school would have done had the same THREATS been made against them,
These 2 players can't play football this year, because of that. which is costing them NIL money
oh they gonna argue and they will probably win
LSU was protecting LSU, as would ANY other school would have done had the same THREATS been made against them,
These 2 players can't play football this year, because of that. which is costing them NIL money
oh they gonna argue and they will probably win
Posted on 9/11/26 at 9:00 am to IOU
quote:First, Judge Jordan won't make a ruling before a party files a motion.
He is most likely waiting for the Federal case to be ruled on before moving forward. That case has to play out before the LA case advances.
Second, in its current posture, the N.D.Ala case has no impact on the 19th JDC case. Judge Jordan won't wait for it.
Third, the 19th JDC Plaintiffs have real and concrete losses as a result of the SEC's actions. Millions of dollars in losses. Tony Clayton could rip the SEC apart with just a few discovery requests that the SEC does not want to answer. I expect a settlement. The SEC's counsel is no better than 0-1-3, and the SEC keeps retaining them.
Posted on 9/11/26 at 9:06 am to bluestem75
I really hope LSU is exempted from any monetary settlement. Let the 15 schools split the settlement between them.
Posted on 9/11/26 at 9:18 am to SlowFlowPro
Just here to Criticize.
I see a Stanford Tree . Did you go there? Cause if you did it explains everything about you. If you didn't go there why are impersonating?
I see a Stanford Tree . Did you go there? Cause if you did it explains everything about you. If you didn't go there why are impersonating?
Posted on 9/11/26 at 9:23 am to Born in BR
So, LSU will not be asking the local judge because the SEC is holding it’s thumb on its head with the two “continuing” open threats they have set in place to dare LSU from doing anything unbecoming. Such bullshite to have to operate under.
Posted on 9/11/26 at 9:23 am to Spankum
quote:
It is all “moot”!
The civil case for the players definitely is not moot
They are going to pursue damages against the SEC and NCAA
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News