Started By
Message

Who hurt their draft stock more by opting out?

Posted on 4/30/21 at 10:51 pm
Posted by coondaddy21
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2012
3222 posts
Posted on 4/30/21 at 10:51 pm
Marshall, Vincent, or Shelvin?

I have a feeling if Marshall had played out the year, he could have proven a little more in regards to his health and production, especially with playing against Bama and finishing out the season as a true number one receiver. It’s easy to see that if the Panthers would have probably taken him sooner in the second had they had a higher pick. I think he could have gone ahead of a fewer WR’s had he not opted out mid season, maybe in the spot Toney went, 20th, or possibly where Bateman went, 27th, to Baltimore. Not terrible as far as how much draft stock he lost but nonetheless, he could have gone higher.

Shelvin was always going to be a lower pick had he not opted out. I think he could have proven a little more by playing but I think his highest round would have been somewhere in the 4th, no matter had he played or not. I just don’t see many teams in the market for a true NT. I think he will probably go in the 5-6th round.

Vincent, in my opinion, lost the most by not playing. With the need for CB’s in the NFL, he could have proven himself to be a late 2nd-3rd round pick, especially with his speed. He took a step up in play in 2019, especially towards the end of the year. He became a better cover corner/nickel back. I have no doubt he would have been drafted on day 2 had he played last year.
Posted by mikelbr
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2008
47463 posts
Posted on 4/30/21 at 10:53 pm to
quote:

Vincent, in my opinion, lost the most by not playing. With the need for CB’s in the NFL, he could have proven himself to be a late 2nd-3rd round pick, especially with his speed. He took a step up in play in 2019, especially towards the end of the year. He became a better cover corner/nickel back. I have no doubt he would have been drafted on day 2 had he played last year.


No highly touted defensive back who played in 2020 improved their stock.
This post was edited on 4/30/21 at 10:54 pm
Posted by cajun12
Houma, LA
Member since Sep 2004
2461 posts
Posted on 4/30/21 at 10:55 pm to
Shelvin could have been a top 3 rounder if he had come back and been dominate. Weight problems are the concern with him.

Vincent was gonna be a 5-7 rounder no matter if he played or not

With that said, i think Shelvin hurt himself more
Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
71509 posts
Posted on 4/30/21 at 10:56 pm to
Playing on our defense has tanked the stocks of the defenders that did play.
This post was edited on 4/30/21 at 10:57 pm
Posted by Bottom9
Arsenal Til I Die
Member since Jul 2010
21681 posts
Posted on 4/30/21 at 10:59 pm to
quote:

I have a feeling if Marshall had played out the year, he could have proven a little more in regards to his health and production, especially with playing against Bama and finishing out the season as a true number one receiver


So 23 TDs in 29 career games or essentially 23 TDs in his last 2 seasons despite missing 6 games wasn't enough for him to showcase that?

He fell because of scouts thinking he was injury prone
Posted by TheWalrus
Member since Dec 2012
40418 posts
Posted on 4/30/21 at 11:15 pm to
Sad thing is Stevens hurt it as much by playing.
Posted by Dudebro2
San Diego
Member since Dec 2011
8967 posts
Posted on 4/30/21 at 11:24 pm to
quote:

Who hurt their draft stock more by opting out?


Good question, but I think you have to wait until the end of the draft to figure that one out. See where the chips fall for each one of the three and then do comparisons. Right now we don’t have the complete data to make comparisons cause there are more rounds to go.
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35363 posts
Posted on 4/30/21 at 11:41 pm to
quote:

Sad thing is Stevens hurt it as much by playing.
Very likely Stevens hurt his stock last year much more. Even our blue chip underclassmen have to rebuild their value next year.
Posted by ECOTIGER
westbank for life
Member since Dec 2007
2837 posts
Posted on 4/30/21 at 11:50 pm to
Stevens isn't good brah
Posted by dljtigers
Sulphur, LA
Member since Feb 2012
1822 posts
Posted on 5/1/21 at 1:47 am to
Stevens has coverage deficiencies that will only get worse in the NFL. If he is able to put on enough pounds to play LB maybe but as a safety it will be questionable. Love what he did for LSU and his effort is without question but in the NFL your weaknesses are magnified.
Posted by VeryReauxna_ish
Bossier City
Member since Dec 2020
1958 posts
Posted on 5/1/21 at 2:15 am to
Everything happens for a reason. Sometimes the reason though is that you’re stupid and make bad decisions. The only one that made the right decision was Jamarr Chase. Hindsight is 20/20 but people who listen to the quitter in themselves instead of the winner usually don’t succeed when they could have.
Posted by GorgeousGeorge
Nola
Member since Jul 2014
1979 posts
Posted on 5/1/21 at 4:29 am to
Marshall didn’t hurt his stock at all despite what people on here want to complain about. He went right where he was supposed to go. The medical evaluation means a lot more in this day and age than opting out and Marshall has a concerning history of lower body injuries. I was happy to hear his name called and I really hope he can stay healthy. I think he landed in a solid situation in Carolina.
This post was edited on 5/1/21 at 6:12 am
Posted by js1591
Member since Jan 2020
2664 posts
Posted on 5/1/21 at 4:59 am to
I think teams are hesitant to pick quitters. Quitting reveals your character. See Devin White and Greedy Williams. Devin will be a hall of gamer. Browns fans have said Greedy has been disappointing.
Posted by js1591
Member since Jan 2020
2664 posts
Posted on 5/1/21 at 5:01 am to
He was injury prone.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
39106 posts
Posted on 5/1/21 at 5:26 am to
quote:

I think teams are hesitant to pick quitters

That’s why Chase slid all the way back to 5.
Posted by Good Times
Hill top in Tn
Member since Nov 2007
23470 posts
Posted on 5/1/21 at 5:35 am to
All the NFL evaluators saw with Chase, was his performances vs Bama and Clemson. His opt out was not considered.
Posted by Tigrdynasty
19th hole
Member since Jun 2018
2731 posts
Posted on 5/1/21 at 5:51 am to
quote:

been dominate


Hopefully this was a typo/auto correct?
Posted by ellesssuuu
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2016
2771 posts
Posted on 5/1/21 at 6:55 am to
Stevens needs to play LB at the pro level. If not he won’t be in the league
Posted by BZ504
Texas
Member since Oct 2005
9416 posts
Posted on 5/1/21 at 7:41 am to
I thought they said Chase had Covid and he still had some effects from it which he decided to opt out. Do you blame anyone for sitting out on that shite show of a season with all the protocols in place?
Posted by RUKIDDINGME
Conroe, TX
Member since Nov 2018
2220 posts
Posted on 5/1/21 at 8:09 am to
Are you naive enough to believe that?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram