0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: When you pay a coach 100 million you need immediate results
Posted on 10/11/26 at 1:01 pm to friendlyobservation
Posted on 10/11/26 at 1:01 pm to friendlyobservation
quote:
friendlyobservation
quote:
I might be in the minority on this and I realize Kiffin is the HC, but the losses are mainly on Baker's shoulders. It's really that simple.
One TD by Kentucky was a punt return and not on the defense.
LSU wins the game without that punt return
also LSU offensive line does not dominate like a championship caliber team and it is what it is. LSU cannot open holes against a typical SEC defense
Posted on 10/11/26 at 1:02 pm to Sofaking2
Unfortunatly it doesn’t work that way.More than one 100 mill coach got beat yesterday,go look.This is the new era of college FB.Every week it’s like this.By the way would you have turned down 13 mill a year,Fn no you wouldn’t have so don’t blame the money that has NOTHING to do with Ws and Ls.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 1:06 pm to sunnydaze
Ah so you’re an idiot and not being intentionally obtuse. Ok well have at it mouth breather
This post was edited on 10/11/26 at 1:07 pm
Posted on 10/11/26 at 1:08 pm to RB10
quote:
Like I posted in another thread, Cignetti has completely warped y’all’s expectations.
1 coach has done what yall are demanding Kiffin do.
How bout you just answer the question instead, since this is all so clear to you.
In today's NIL/Transfer portal era, what does he not have that he'll have access to later?
Posted on 10/11/26 at 1:14 pm to sunnydaze
Nothing our program has done in its entire history denotes we get to be as entitled as the OP.
We become the next dynasty? Then we can bitch when seasons flop.
Until then. Lower your expectations
We become the next dynasty? Then we can bitch when seasons flop.
Until then. Lower your expectations
Posted on 10/11/26 at 1:15 pm to John Rambeaux
Different players? Different coaches? Less injuries?
What are you even asking?
What are you even asking?
Posted on 10/11/26 at 1:21 pm to BilJ
BillJ you’ve been a retard on here for over 20 years. Go touch grass
Posted on 10/11/26 at 1:41 pm to sunnydaze
Rrrr go touch grass….see what I mean about you being an idiot? Have to rip off Reddit to hurl an insult. That makes you lazy and stupid really.
Plus you’ve been here for 16 years and have 30k posts, I’m not sure you’re the guy to be making that case…but again, you’re an idiot
Plus you’ve been here for 16 years and have 30k posts, I’m not sure you’re the guy to be making that case…but again, you’re an idiot
Posted on 10/11/26 at 2:16 pm to sunnydaze
UCLA has wins over Cal, San Diego State, Purdue, Maryland and Oregon.
The Ducks are the only respectable team of the bunch, and they lost to a putrid Okie State.
The bottom of the Big10 sucks, which inflates the records of the merely average.
The Ducks are the only respectable team of the bunch, and they lost to a putrid Okie State.
The bottom of the Big10 sucks, which inflates the records of the merely average.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 3:17 pm to burke985
quote:
Maybe we should go play in a shite conference like Indiana then so we can pad our stats. You can't tell me how shitty of conference it is and we shouldn't go there and then glorify coach that dominates that shitty conference.
Indiana pistol whipped Bama 38-3, and Ohio State, Oregon twice, and Miami last year.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 3:22 pm to BilJ
7-5, maybe 8-4, is vast improvement? Oozes mediocre failure
Posted on 10/11/26 at 3:26 pm to Breauxfessor
quote:
Indiana wins no natties if they play our schedule.
So, you're suggesting we change conferences?
That's the Kiffin defenders position? "It's too hard!"
Posted on 10/11/26 at 3:28 pm to sunnydaze
It’s not reasonable to expect instant championships in year 1 no matter how much money you throw at something.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 3:28 pm to John Rambeaux
This is the scary and concerning part.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 3:29 pm to sunnydaze
OK. Thanks.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 3:30 pm to John Rambeaux
quote:
How bout you just answer the question instead, since this is all so clear to you.
In today's NIL/Transfer portal era, what does he not have that he'll have access to later?
Depth. He’s been talking about a lack of depth for months. Before any of the injuries he said it was a concern. You already said you “don’t want to hear it” so I don’t really see a point in wasting my time explaining it to you.
You’d rather melt and demand immediate results rather than letting he and his staff build the program.
This post was edited on 10/11/26 at 3:33 pm
Posted on 10/11/26 at 3:36 pm to sunnydaze
You can’t never really judge a coach on his 1st year sunny. I mean you can, but you shouldn’t.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 3:38 pm to LSUtigah
You're not reading into what he's saying though. Indiana was able to do that because the schedule they played was so weak. They were 100% going into the post season.
Old Dominion----Unranked
Kennesaw State-----Unranked
Indiana State----Unranked
Illinois-----Unranked
Iowa (first challenge?) RANK 23 basically Unranked
Oregon (first serious challenge) RANK 5
Michigan State----Unranked
Ucla----Unranked
Maryland-----Unranked
Penn state------Unranked
Wisconsin----Unranked
Purdue----Unranked
They played ONE serious team before they had to face Ohio State and Alabama.
Yes, they were a very good football team. But it's a lot easier to maintain a healthy football team throughout the year and waltz into the post season when you play one team with a pulse before you get to that point. I mean half their schedule usually has schools on it that casual fans don't even know exist.
LSU played 5 ranked teams last year.
Old Dominion----Unranked
Kennesaw State-----Unranked
Indiana State----Unranked
Illinois-----Unranked
Iowa (first challenge?) RANK 23 basically Unranked
Oregon (first serious challenge) RANK 5
Michigan State----Unranked
Ucla----Unranked
Maryland-----Unranked
Penn state------Unranked
Wisconsin----Unranked
Purdue----Unranked
They played ONE serious team before they had to face Ohio State and Alabama.
Yes, they were a very good football team. But it's a lot easier to maintain a healthy football team throughout the year and waltz into the post season when you play one team with a pulse before you get to that point. I mean half their schedule usually has schools on it that casual fans don't even know exist.
LSU played 5 ranked teams last year.
This post was edited on 10/11/26 at 3:39 pm
Posted on 10/11/26 at 3:42 pm to friendlyobservation
quote:
I might be in the minority on this and I realize Kiffin is the HC, but the losses are mainly on Baker's shoulders. It's really that simple.
That’s a wild position given the game last night. The defense put us position to win and the offensive failed to put the nail in the coffin. Kentucky scored a total of 6 points in the second half despite Kentucky getting short fields.
The reality is LSU had the ball twice in the last five minutes with the ability to close out the game. The first was a horrific turnover and the second was a bad coaching call. It’s 4th and 1. You’re one yard away from sealing the win.
Kentucky came into the game average 36 points on offense and the defense gave up 20 in regulation.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 3:48 pm to RB10
quote:
How bout you just answer the question instead, since this is all so clear to you. In today's NIL/Transfer portal era, what does he not have that he'll have access to later?
Depth
I agree with depth and was also thinking experience in his system. A whole off season with a healthy QB would be nice.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News