- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Updated: ESPN reports TM7 wants to stay; nola.com says not so fast
Posted on 8/13/12 at 1:05 pm to Indiana Tiger
Posted on 8/13/12 at 1:05 pm to Indiana Tiger
quote:
Not picking on you Doc, but this is just stupid. He may lose a year of eligibility because of the suspension, but not because he isn't on the team. You have 5 years to play 4 once you attend classes full time. A player could leave after one year of playing during his freshman year, just because. If he returned in a year, he would have used that year as his redshirt and would have 3 yrs of eligibility remaining.
Hard time believing the NCAA would grant redshirt because a player was suspended for breaking team rules. Maybe it's just me?
4
Posted on 8/13/12 at 1:07 pm to heartbreakTiger
quote:
it resting in allevas hands makes me think it wont go the way most of us would like.
I think it's the admin and not Aleva. In the wake of Penn State, they will overreact to reign in these "runaway" athletic depts. It's about perception, not reality.
Posted on 8/13/12 at 1:07 pm to Tyrael
All Les has to say is that Tm7 was initially given the 1yr suspension option or dismissal. He originally chose dismissal but has since had a change of heart. LSU is allowing him to take original penalty of 1 yr suspension.
Posted on 8/13/12 at 1:09 pm to TheDoc
quote:
Hard time believing the NCAA would grant redshirt because a player was suspended for breaking team rules. Maybe it's just me?
Not debating that he will lose a year; just debating the reason. It's because he is being sanctioned, not because he isn't on the team.
Posted on 8/13/12 at 1:10 pm to OldSarge38
quote:
OldSarge38
You should keep you old, ignorant opinions to yourself.
Posted on 8/13/12 at 1:13 pm to TheDoc
quote:
Hard time believing the NCAA would grant redshirt because a player was suspended for breaking team rules. Maybe it's just me?
If he doesn't play this year, he would automatically get the redshirt, since he hasn't redshirted yet. It's not the same as having played in a couple of games,getting suspended for the remainder of the season and trying to compare it to a medical hardship.
Posted on 8/13/12 at 1:13 pm to TheDoc
Sup everybody. Anybody care to give me cliff notes? Is this a done deal or legit...
Tia
Tia
Posted on 8/13/12 at 1:15 pm to Informer
quote:
If he doesn't play this year, he would automatically get the redshirt, since he hasn't redshirted yet. It's not the same as having played in a couple of games,getting suspended for the remainder of the season and trying to compare it to a medical hardship.
My understanding as well. He would have 5 to play 4 and he didn't RS. I think he could play '13 and '14 if he sits out '12.
Posted on 8/13/12 at 1:16 pm to iwyLSUiwy
I'm all down for this.
Straight up
Straight up
Posted on 8/13/12 at 1:17 pm to iwyLSUiwy
quote:
Anybody care to give me cliff notes? Is this a done deal or legit...
Nobody knows shite.
Posted on 8/13/12 at 1:19 pm to 10888bge
I'll play devils advocate
Why does he deserve a fourth chance if he fricked up the first three?
No player is bigger than the University itself
Why does he deserve a fourth chance if he fricked up the first three?
No player is bigger than the University itself
Posted on 8/13/12 at 1:21 pm to PigglyWiggly
quote:
Why does he deserve a fourth chance if he fricked up the first three
because it's in the rules' handbook
Posted on 8/13/12 at 1:21 pm to PigglyWiggly
quote:
I'll play devils advocate
Why does he deserve a fourth chance if he fricked up the first three?
No player is bigger than the University itself
Why does anyone? That's the way it is written in the policy, assuming he is on step 3.
Posted on 8/13/12 at 1:21 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
quote:
Nobody knows shite.
This on so many levels
Posted on 8/13/12 at 1:21 pm to sunnydaze
Right .... I forgot that rules are meant to be broken
Posted on 8/13/12 at 1:23 pm to TheDoc
quote:
Hard time believing the NCAA would grant redshirt because a player was suspended for breaking team rules. Maybe it's just me?
The rules are exactly what he said, you get five calendar years to spend four on the field. Even if the NCAA regs state that a suspension counts as a burn on playing eligibility, he would be eligible to return as a senior with one year of playing eligibility and two years on his clock.
Posted on 8/13/12 at 1:23 pm to PigglyWiggly
Id say cus he wont be on scholly, or at least alleva wouldnt allow that. So if he messes up before next september it wouldnt matter. Hed just be a paying student and wouldnt be let back on the team.
Posted on 8/13/12 at 1:24 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
quote:
Hugo Stiglitz
quote:
Nobody knows shite.
Posted on 8/13/12 at 1:28 pm to PigglyWiggly
quote:
Why does he deserve a fourth chance if he fricked up the first three?
Well why does anyone deserve a fourth chance? Why are penalties written up in the handbook for fourth offenses if no one deserves that chance?
Posted on 8/13/12 at 1:28 pm to PigglyWiggly
quote:
Right .... I forgot that rules are meant to be broken
Well why not just change the rules to 1 and done, right?
Page 20 of 59
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News