Started By
Message

re: UPDATE **** NCAA Rules Allow Review of Targeting Suspensions in Second Half

Posted on 10/23/18 at 4:00 pm to
Posted by GratefulTiger
Member since Dec 2003
1557 posts
Posted on 10/23/18 at 4:00 pm to
Seriously, why doesnt the SEC do this????? Especially with all the scrutiny surrounding. There's no better scenario for this rule to be enacted.

It is absolutely inexcusable for this independent review not to happen. There's literally no reason the SEC shouldn't do this.

Devin White is being held out of the game illegally by the SEC. He did not target according to the exact rule that was written regardless of any type of interpretation.

Our admins need to seek a written reason on why the SEC wont seek a national review and which rule he broke.
This post was edited on 10/23/18 at 4:22 pm
Posted by MISSOURI WALTZ
Wolf Island, MO
Member since Feb 2016
742 posts
Posted on 10/23/18 at 4:01 pm to
quote:

LSU should leave SEC

Get Arkansas, Mississippi State, Mizzou, Ole Miss, and Texas A&M on board and I would support looking into the Big XII.

BIG XVI West

Baylor
Kansas
Kansas State
Oklahoma
Oklahoma State
TCU
Texas
Texas Tech

BIG XVI EAST

Arkansas
Iowa State
LSU
Mississippi State
Mizzou
Ole Miss
Texas A&M
West Virginia

When word of that got out the SEC office would take one massive collective dump.
This post was edited on 10/23/18 at 4:13 pm
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123813 posts
Posted on 10/23/18 at 4:05 pm to
quote:

STEVE SHAW
Posted by BayouLSU
down south
Member since Feb 2007
471 posts
Posted on 10/23/18 at 4:09 pm to
The fact that there apparently is a process for appeal needs to be the next email drive by our fanbase to ESPN and the sec!!!!!!!!
Posted by I-59 Tiger
Vestavia Hills, AL
Member since Sep 2003
36703 posts
Posted on 10/23/18 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

If a player is disqualified in the second half, the conference (unless Southeastern Conference has the option to consult the national coordinator of football officials who would then facilitate a video review.

If a player is disqualified in the second half of a Southeastern Conference game, if player in question is going to play the University of Alabama next player is immediately disqualified
Posted by Macavity92
Member since Dec 2004
5981 posts
Posted on 10/23/18 at 4:12 pm to
Already sent emails to Rabalais and Dellenger figuring they, if they so desired, could get better access and answers than I can. We will see. But emailing to others with similar access can't hurt.
Posted by uway
Member since Sep 2004
33109 posts
Posted on 10/23/18 at 4:22 pm to
The penalized team should have the option to appeal to the NCAA. It makes no sense to leave it up to the conference when they themselves made the call in the first place.

It is a penalty against LSU. LSU should be able to ask for review.
Posted by CP3forMVP
Member since Nov 2010
14871 posts
Posted on 10/23/18 at 4:27 pm to
This whole thing is just stupid. LSU should be able to go over the SEC's head if their is a governing body over the SEC.
Posted by lsufan_26
Member since Feb 2004
12559 posts
Posted on 10/23/18 at 4:31 pm to
quote:

by Mulat

quote:

1. SEC office moves out of Alabama, 2. Complete staff change - top to bottom or LSU should leave SEC - things will never change, only fools think otherwise...

Jesus Christ. How many times are you going to post this?
Posted by geauxtigers33
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2014
13734 posts
Posted on 10/23/18 at 4:45 pm to
quote:

would support looking into the Big XII.


You think the Sec is biased towards Bama and you wanna go to the Big 12?

At least in the SEC it is perceived bias in the Big 12 the bias is written in the rule book toward Texas then Oklahoma then everyone else. There is a reason A&M and Missouri left to come to the SEC
Posted by Bert Macklin FBI
Quantico
Member since May 2013
8898 posts
Posted on 10/23/18 at 4:55 pm to
I tweeted it to Delly, Brooks Kubena, Coach O, and Jaques Doucet.

Hopefully some of them will write about it.
Posted by ropesmoknrednek
Member since Mar 2005
140 posts
Posted on 10/23/18 at 4:57 pm to
Sabans
Executive
Committee
Posted by BayouLSU
down south
Member since Feb 2007
471 posts
Posted on 10/23/18 at 4:59 pm to
Thread needs a sticky.
Posted by GratefulTiger
Member since Dec 2003
1557 posts
Posted on 10/23/18 at 5:05 pm to
quote:

Thread needs a sticky. 


The SEC is blocking this appeal. As I mentioned earlier, there couldn't be a better scenerio for this rule to be enacted.
This post was edited on 10/23/18 at 5:09 pm
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123813 posts
Posted on 10/23/18 at 5:07 pm to
quote:

The fact that there apparently is a process for appeal needs to be the next email drive by our fanbase to ESPN and the sec!!!!!!!!
Do you know who Steve Shaw is?
Posted by Cannon style
Homer,La.
Member since Sep 2018
1582 posts
Posted on 10/23/18 at 5:15 pm to
Well has he been contacted
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83445 posts
Posted on 10/23/18 at 5:16 pm to
quote:

Where is the NCAA hq?
Anniston
Posted by ktxn1952
East Texas
Member since Aug 2018
939 posts
Posted on 10/23/18 at 5:34 pm to
Dude! This was mentioned previously and it STILL doesn't have any bearing on White!
Posted by LSUStar
Medellin
Member since Sep 2009
10438 posts
Posted on 10/23/18 at 5:39 pm to
As I read it, the SEC must ask the NCdoubleA$$holes for a "consultation" (read circle jerk). No chance of that happening.

Posted by jp4lsu
Member since Sep 2016
4956 posts
Posted on 10/23/18 at 5:47 pm to
EVERY targeting call is reviewed at the time of the penalty. Therefore how does this quote make sense,

"Update: I have now learned that LSU was told that this rule does not apply due to the existence of the instant replay."

Then no suspension due to targeting could ever be overturned because every single targeting play is reviewed.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram