- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tom Mars gives his explanation of why he is saying the Conferences will ultimately win
Posted on 8/29/26 at 9:44 pm to tigerskin
Posted on 8/29/26 at 9:44 pm to tigerskin
This dude loves to hear himself talk. What a pretentious arse word salad. He may have broken a record for corporate buzzwords in one post.
Posted on 8/29/26 at 9:45 pm to tigerskin
The homeless wino across the street knows more than this mars ole miss homer.
Posted on 8/29/26 at 9:49 pm to tigerskin
Let’s say for argument sake that Lane is wrong adding these players.
Why is Tom Mars so adamant about calling him out while his client Chambliss is ineligible according to the NCAA?
Why is Tom Mars so adamant about calling him out while his client Chambliss is ineligible according to the NCAA?
Posted on 8/29/26 at 9:50 pm to tigerskin
A lot of BS to ignore the fact that the conferences have set themselves up as a cartel to block the players from exercising rights affirmed by the courts.
Posted on 8/29/26 at 9:57 pm to tigerskin
quote:
That’s why I’d be telling any school that is considering putting a former NFL or NBA player on their roster they will likely regret making such a risky decision - one that will probably be career-ending for anyone who was willing to take that gamble.
I've been saying that these players won't play because the legal risk isn't worth it. I guarantee that LSU leadership is hearing the same thing from its counsel as what Tom is saying in his post.
It would be retarded to have a roster that can get you in the playoffs and then find yourself sitting at home b/c you played a 2nd-string TE and backup DL.
However, anything short of "Muh! LSU does what they want! Play the Pro Players!!" is frowned upon
Posted on 8/29/26 at 10:01 pm to rds dc
Unfortunately, I agree. I have a feeling Lane is going to ask Tom if he thinks it is worth the risk before making a roster move. Whatever we may think, Lane feels Tom is a go to person for this stuff.
Of course we have no idea what will happen on Thursday
Of course we have no idea what will happen on Thursday
This post was edited on 8/29/26 at 10:06 pm
Posted on 8/29/26 at 10:03 pm to Geauxgurt
quote:
So his client, who is in bad faith lying about how tonsillitis cost him a year, is okay?
Mars is a POS, so this is no surprise.
The NCAA appealed the case all the way to the Mississippi Supreme Court, which denied the NCAA's subsequent appeal to block the lower court's decision. At each step, it was determined that the medical documentation was sufficient to let the case proceed,
If anything, Mars is well positioned to comment on cases against the NCAA.
Posted on 8/29/26 at 10:05 pm to rds dc
At each step it was determined that there were Ole Miss judges to make the decision they wanted (fixed it for you)
Posted on 8/29/26 at 10:06 pm to tigerskin
Who is Tom Mars and why should I give a shite what he says?
Posted on 8/29/26 at 10:10 pm to Meauxjeaux
LINK
And actually he is the guy that Lane contacted to get Chambliss eligible for another year. That process started before Lane came to LSU
Yes I do think Mars has something against LSU as he is an Arkansas guy jealous about LSU football
And actually he is the guy that Lane contacted to get Chambliss eligible for another year. That process started before Lane came to LSU
Yes I do think Mars has something against LSU as he is an Arkansas guy jealous about LSU football
This post was edited on 8/29/26 at 10:13 pm
Posted on 8/29/26 at 10:13 pm to tigerskin
quote:
At each step it was determined that there were Ole Miss judges to make the decision they wanted (fixed it for you)
I guess there is no way to disprove what you are saying. However, do you really believe that the Mississippi Supreme Court is on the take for Ole Miss?
Posted on 8/29/26 at 10:15 pm to tigerskin
That’s a lot of words to say “I was wrong-again.”
Posted on 8/29/26 at 10:17 pm to rds dc
Well the Ole Miss talking heads were saying they were almost all Ole Miss or Ole Miss law school grads. And they were bragging it was a done deal way before it got to that point. So I can put 2 and 2 together.
I would have to fact check the numbers. It was Ben Garret and his crew all giddy about it from the jump and they weren't afraid to say why
I would have to fact check the numbers. It was Ben Garret and his crew all giddy about it from the jump and they weren't afraid to say why
This post was edited on 8/29/26 at 10:25 pm
Posted on 8/29/26 at 10:24 pm to rds dc
On what legal basis does the SEC have the right to retroactively punish a school, coach or player when the courts have specifically said they can’t?
LSU would probably countersue for retaliatory actions taken by the SEC when they were just following a court order.
Right now the NCAA/SEC rule is suspended regarding the players. It’s going to be in litigation to see if it’s even legal or not. If they happen to overturn it in court during the season then LSU will just cut them from the roster.
LSU would probably countersue for retaliatory actions taken by the SEC when they were just following a court order.
Right now the NCAA/SEC rule is suspended regarding the players. It’s going to be in litigation to see if it’s even legal or not. If they happen to overturn it in court during the season then LSU will just cut them from the roster.
Posted on 8/29/26 at 11:55 pm to rds dc
They're not going to touch LSU or Texas or any school that does it this year. Moving forward though, different story. LSU basically already said they'll act on courts decision which tells you they're playing if they rule in their favor. They would be opening themselves up to some major lawsuits if they tried to penalize these schools.
This post was edited on 8/29/26 at 11:57 pm
Posted on 8/30/26 at 12:11 am to tigerskin
Yeah, he left out that little detail.
Posted on 8/30/26 at 12:53 am to Rankee
Players were claimed that they will suffer from irrefutable harm with a stay during the season
Posted on 8/30/26 at 1:23 am to rds dc
quote:
I guess there is no way to disprove what you are saying. However, do you really believe that the Mississippi Supreme Court is on the take for Ole Miss?
We can only look at the facts as we know them.
Trinidad admitted that his illness didn't cause him to miss any practice or games - FACT
The testimony presented by Chambliss' team were him, his mom, an Ole Miss coach, and an Oxford ENT, who weren't at Ferris State during the illness in question - FACT
SEC bylaws state that a player must follow all NCAA rules, guidelines, requirements, etc, to compete or practice - FACT
The NCAA denied his medical redshirt request twice - FACT
Chambliss' applied for a medical redshirt for the 2022 season, however he waited until December 2024 to have his tonsils removed - FACT
It's interesting to me that the SEC is so hellbent against keeping these specific players from competing, but don't seem to care about Pavia or Chambliss, also circumventing their rules.
In my opinion, none of them should be playing.
Posted on 8/30/26 at 2:58 am to tigerskin
A lawyer that thinks he know more than he actually knows. Color me shocked.
Posted on 8/30/26 at 3:14 am to tigerskin
I know what you’re doing. This response made me laugh too hard!

Popular
Back to top


0



