re: This pitching swap plays to Yeskie strength

You just a troll on this board just like your alter

quote:

---

Oh here is the other cuck boy loser troll who uses chatgpt to make replies. You and htt10 are lovers.

---

I don’t think you’d have the gumption nor wherewithal to say that to his face irl

yeah right, everyone knows who pussy p is.

Your his cheerleader too. Threatening fighting on a website is wild.

Hold that tiger 10
Pussy P
Lester Earl
Notastar"ghey"zer

All trolls and a few more. Several people here are aware of this also and on to yall's bs.

A Chrysler 300 look like a Phantom until a Phantom pull up.

Nearly 300K posts on the most degenerate message board known to man, and you dare to make any reference to "IRL"... homie, the lack of self-awareness is astonishing lmao

quote:

---

The time constraints and the conflicting incentives (pure development vs winning) make anyone, not just Yeskie, taking on too many "projects" a fools errand.

---

This is such a good point that most people—myself included—don’t really account for to the level it actually plays out. It’s not the summer league or the minors where immediate results don’t really matter, and you can develop for the long-term. The biggest part of Yeskie’s job is to help LSU win immediately, not develop guys to be at their absolute best 3 years from now. It would be great if those 2 interests aligned, but they often don’t.

So Yeskie—hell, all college coaches—are forced to think more short term. “How can I get this guy to help us win NOW, and be at his “best” by the end of THIS season?” Their “long-term” thinking with guys they’re counting on to contribute to the current team is development over a season.

And a lot of times they are forced to take “short cuts” that may not necessarily be in the best interest of a guy’s development over a 2 or 3 year period when they likely will be long gone from Baton Rouge.

And somebody above mentioned mindset and the mental part of pitching, which I believe, is mostly just innate. Can you miss your spot, give up a 425 foot bomb, and immediately put it behind you, take the pill, and go back to work? Or, like what happened a lot with our defense this year, can you make a good pitch that turns an out into an E4, or a bloop that finds a hole—especially if they happen back to back—and dig down deep and not let it blow up into a huge inning?

It’s hard to throw 5-6 “outs” in an inning and overcome it. Again, I think a lot of that is innate. But you have to have the stuff 1st. Like put Gavin Guidry’s head on William Schmidt’s body, and he’s probably an All-American. Yeskie can help that some, but he’s limited like all coaches.

quote:

---

Yeskie strengths are managing developed pitchers.

---

I think we are taking stabs at evaluating him with very little data. I doubt any of us really dissected Yeski’s staff progress in his previous years.

quote:

---

I’m not doing your research for you.

If you watched any baseball the last two years, that’s all the proof you need.

---

It's wild that some of you believe you can accurately judge a coach based on just watching games on TV.

quote:

---

doubt any of us really dissected Yeski’s staff progress in his previous years.

---

I do know he helped Kade Anderson go from a pitcher that struggled getting outs in sec play into the best pitcher in college baseball.