- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

These are the kind of articles we are subjected to these days
Posted on 1/3/17 at 7:03 am
Posted on 1/3/17 at 7:03 am
LINK
"Fresh off a decisive 29-9 Citrus Bowl victory over Louisville, LSU nation is riding high, as it well should be. But after going back through the tape, it’s clear that the win wasn’t as decisive as the scoreboard — or even the stats — say it was."
"What I mean when I say the win wasn’t as decisive as we think is simple: LSU won because of the way it shut down Louisville’s passing attack. That’s it. LSU’s offense might’ve played its worst game since Alabama (more on that later) and the run defense honestly didn’t play up to its potential either."
Is this real life?
"Fresh off a decisive 29-9 Citrus Bowl victory over Louisville, LSU nation is riding high, as it well should be. But after going back through the tape, it’s clear that the win wasn’t as decisive as the scoreboard — or even the stats — say it was."
"What I mean when I say the win wasn’t as decisive as we think is simple: LSU won because of the way it shut down Louisville’s passing attack. That’s it. LSU’s offense might’ve played its worst game since Alabama (more on that later) and the run defense honestly didn’t play up to its potential either."
Is this real life?
Posted on 1/3/17 at 7:08 am to L S Usetheforce
Yeah all we did was shut down the heisman winning QB that averages more yards per game on his own than most offenses do.
We don't deserve it. Give it to the team that barely got past their own 20
We don't deserve it. Give it to the team that barely got past their own 20
This post was edited on 1/3/17 at 7:09 am
Posted on 1/3/17 at 7:09 am to L S Usetheforce
Good god that is hard to read
Posted on 1/3/17 at 7:12 am to Tshiz
It's like the author was coined to write an article about LSU but couldn't say anything positive without 4 negatives first.
Posted on 1/3/17 at 7:13 am to L S Usetheforce
Im pretty sure that was the game plan. They knew UL had a decent D especially inside.
Posted on 1/3/17 at 7:16 am to L S Usetheforce
clever analytical strategy...take out LSU's best plays (sacks and long Guice run), and we statistically weren't that good.

Posted on 1/3/17 at 7:21 am to L S Usetheforce
many of his bigger runs came at the end of the game when the outcome was already decided
so, no.
referring to Jackson here
so, no.
referring to Jackson here
This post was edited on 1/3/17 at 8:47 am
Posted on 1/3/17 at 7:36 am to L S Usetheforce
quote:
It's like the author was coined to write an article about LSU but couldn't say anything positive without 4 negatives first.
Almost sounds like some of the tRant posters here.

Posted on 1/3/17 at 7:43 am to L S Usetheforce
He is right about the offense. Guice didn't really have a great game. He busted that long one, but before that, he had been held in check. Louisville does have a good rush D though.
And Etling was very erratic. He was bailed out several times by Dupre. It was pretty frustrating game to watch the offense.
The defense was incredible though.
And Etling was very erratic. He was bailed out several times by Dupre. It was pretty frustrating game to watch the offense.
The defense was incredible though.
Posted on 1/3/17 at 7:43 am to L S Usetheforce
If you look past about 15 great plays and change the way some stats are compiled, LSU wasn't that impressive. That is the short version.
Posted on 1/3/17 at 7:44 am to Hooligan's Ghost
quote:
many of his bigger runs came at the end of the game when the outcome was already decided
yeah...he kinda disingenuous for him to take away all of LSU's sacks and big runs to make a point
but to not take away any of Louisville's sacks or large gains
Posted on 1/3/17 at 7:45 am to L S Usetheforce
So when Jackson scrambles for a positive gain, it's rushing yards. But if he's tackled behind the LOS (even when scrambling and looking to run), it's a sack and doesn't decrease his rushing total?
Posted on 1/3/17 at 7:46 am to Ole War Skule
quote:
clever analytical strategy...take out LSU's best plays (sacks and long Guice run), and we statistically weren't that good.
The author should have done his analysis where he takes 20 LSU points off the board and then he could have rationalized a Louisville win.
Posted on 1/3/17 at 8:05 am to L S Usetheforce
I always get a good laugh from these 23 year old web writers who try to break down film and analytics like they are a coordinator.
Posted on 1/3/17 at 8:06 am to Salmon
quote:Yes, but its been that way all year, and we still moved the ball and scored when we needed to and then some. But I agree, Etling is really not very good. He can be inconsistent on his throws, but we can ill afford his interceptions.
And Etling was very erratic. He was bailed out several times by Dupre. It was pretty frustrating game to watch the offense.
quote:This. It was certainly one of the best efforts all year. And if the defense has only played average, the offensive poor play would have made it a very tough game, instead the defense allowed it to be comfortable, fairly easy win.
The defense was incredible though.
Posted on 1/3/17 at 9:42 am to L S Usetheforce
quote:
Whether you’re coaching in the NFL, the SEC or the middle school in suburban Georgia where I played football,
I think I found the problem.

Posted on 1/3/17 at 9:49 am to L S Usetheforce
Every college football game could be analyzed similarly. I bet if this writer looked at the OSU-Clemson game, he would conclude that OSU had a chance to win. Flawed logic
Posted on 1/3/17 at 9:50 am to Ole War Skule
quote:
clever analytical strategy...take out LSU's best plays (sacks and long Guice run), and we statistically weren't that good.

Posted on 1/3/17 at 9:58 am to L S Usetheforce
That isn't some seriously dumb arse shite, and he's just trying to be edgy and original. Proof of that is found in his wanting to give the MVP to Godchaux or Bower over Guice
Popular
Back to top
