- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The sentence that matters…the action that matters…
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:16 pm
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:16 pm
EDIT: Finebaum just said on CNN that LSU is not getting voted out. He said the opposite earlier today on his show. He’s a mouthpiece for Sankey. I withdraw everything I said. LSU will not get voted out, it appears.
Greg Sankey:
“Consensus … was and continues to be that LSU’s continued membership in the Conference would be inconsistent with the SEC’s values and principles — even if LSU does not use the former NFL players.”
The SEC is preemptively seeking a restraining order preventing LSU from preventing the meeting Thursday and the results of the meeting from being enforced.
He’s telling you that they are kicking LSU out and attempting to prevent them from doing anything about it (like seek their own remedy).
The presumption is that LSU would seek its own TRO to allow it to finish the SEC season.
The SEC is asking Judge Annemarie Carney Axon to prohibit LSU and Louisiana officials not merely from stopping Thursday’s meeting, but from seeking judicial intervention to delay or undo a termination vote.
Sankey has said LSU is getting kicked out and they’ve taken legal steps to block LSU from being able to stop it.
This post was edited on 9/8/26 at 9:15 pm
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:17 pm to DeltaDoc
They asked for legal steps. Nothing has been granted and a fed judge is likely to scoff at such.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:18 pm to DeltaDoc
I’m leaning this way too. I think a vote is coming unfortunately.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:20 pm to BoogaBear
I don’t disagree…but people need to accept this isn’t a bluff. The SEC members are voting LSU out Thursday. If the court doesn’t grant the TRO tomorrow then LSU can at least seek to enjoin immediate expulsion.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:22 pm to TrueTiger07
Sankey has said it’s happening.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:22 pm to BoogaBear
You’re not understanding what is happening here.
They don’t need a legal decision to kick LSU out. They’re only going to court tomorrow to make sure LSU doesn’t try and stop them from booting us on Thursday
They don’t need a legal decision to kick LSU out. They’re only going to court tomorrow to make sure LSU doesn’t try and stop them from booting us on Thursday
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:22 pm to DeltaDoc
Yeah. The posters on here thinking this is a good thing are insane.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:23 pm to DeltaDoc
quote:
Sankey has said it’s happening.
Oh the backlash will be glorious.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:24 pm to geauxbrown
Exactly…and they are seeking to block LSU from preventing immediate expulsion through some injunction.
It’s devious…but very clear now.
We are getting the boot.
It’s devious…but very clear now.
We are getting the boot.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:24 pm to DeltaDoc
quote:
“Consensus … was and continues to be that LSU’s continued membership in the Conference would be inconsistent with the SEC’s values and principles — even if LSU does not use the former NFL players.”
Glad he at least took the mask off. Now we know that nothing short of nuking our athletic department will satisfy these people.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:24 pm to DeltaDoc
All the SEC insiders (Finebaum/Dellenger/Thamel/Hayes) that have been being fed stories from the SEC the last two weeks all included versions of “the SEC is doing this to get LSU fully capitulate and offer pound of flesh.” It seems very clear that ideal outcome for the SEC is LSU bends the knee, pays a fine, accepts a suspension for Kiffin and begs forgiveness.
The question is if LSU doesn’t do that is this all just a bluff or will the SEC go through with it on Thursday?
The question is if LSU doesn’t do that is this all just a bluff or will the SEC go through with it on Thursday?
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:24 pm to SulphursFinest
This is two parents blaming the kids for the divorce. And the two parents are the NCAA and the SEC. Zero look in the mirror and ability to resolve conflict in a proactive manner.
This post was edited on 9/8/26 at 8:26 pm
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:25 pm to DeltaDoc
"'The SEC has endured and thrived for nearly a century because its members have adhered to that common set of rules, which each member institution, and every coach at those institutions, has agreed to follow,' the SEC's federal lawsuit said. "Among the most fundamental of those rules are the longstanding provisions that prohibit individuals who have entered a professional draft, signed professional contracts, or been rostered on a professional athletics team from returning to compete in college athletics (the "Professionalism Rules")."
Except when it comes to Alabama and Charles Bediako.
Except when it comes to Alabama and Charles Bediako.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:25 pm to DeltaDoc
Is he forgetting that Sankey and the conference are subject to an order by the BR judge? Seems to me that these actions constitute egregious disobedience. What happens when Sankey is jailed and the SEC is subjected to a fine of $1 million per day of non-compliance?
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:25 pm to geauxbrown
quote:
You’re not understanding what is happening here.
I understand the situation fine. The entire reason they are asking to block LSU from legal action is so they can kick them out. I'm saying in my opinion that will not be granted and they will not kick them out.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:27 pm to DeltaDoc
So you’re saying that LSU in the Sec is no more?
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:27 pm to DeltaDoc
quote:
Greg Sankey: “Consensus … was and continues to be that LSU’s continued membership in the Conference would be inconsistent with the SEC’s values and principles — even if LSU does not use the former NFL players.” The SEC is preemptively seeking a restraining order preventing LSU from preventing the meeting Thursday and the results of the meeting from being enforced. He’s telling you that they are kicking LSU out and attempting to prevent them from doing anything about it (like seek their own remedy). The presumption is that LSU would seek its own TRO to allow it to finish the SEC season. The SEC is asking Judge Annemarie Carney Axon to prohibit LSU and Louisiana officials not merely from stopping Thursday’s meeting, but from seeking judicial intervention to delay or undo a termination vote. Sankey has said LSU is getting kicked out and they’ve taken legal steps to block LSU from being able to stop it.
But WHY??
That is what makes no sense at all.
The math isn’t adding up at all.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:28 pm to BoogaBear
quote:
understand the situation fine. The entire reason they are asking to block LSU from legal action is so they can kick them out. I'm saying in my opinion that will not be granted and they will not kick them out.
I highly doubt Sankey would make this move without a consensus among his members. He already has the votes and Liz stated today that LSU has no designs on stopping the Thursday vote
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:30 pm to TigerYac
Yes, it certainly appears that way.
The talk of LSU backing down makes no sense. What are they to back down from.
Sankey’s own words said they don’t care if they don’t roster the players. They are kicking LSU out for allegedly colluding with players to sue the conference.
There is no concession to make and the SEC is not looking for one.
The talk of LSU backing down makes no sense. What are they to back down from.
Sankey’s own words said they don’t care if they don’t roster the players. They are kicking LSU out for allegedly colluding with players to sue the conference.
There is no concession to make and the SEC is not looking for one.
Popular
Back to top

18




