- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The SEC’s expulsion threat is legally possible, but practically laughable
Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:43 pm
Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:43 pm
The SEC technically has the authority to consider removing LSU. Its bylaws allow membership to be terminated with a two thirds vote, which would require at least 11 of the 16 presidents and chancellors.
But this feels almost entirely like theatrics by the SEC.
They are not seriously preparing to kick LSU out. They are putting the biggest possible threat on the table so they can argue in federal court that the conference, not a Louisiana judge, has the final authority to govern its members.
The SEC’s argument is that LSU voluntarily agreed to follow conference rules and cannot force the other schools to compete against players the SEC considers professionals. It is even making a First Amendment “freedom of association” argument.
That is not completely frivolous, but it feels extremely forced here.
LSU did not secretly play ineligible players. A Louisiana judge cleared the players to return and blocked the SEC from punishing LSU for using them. LSU still left them off the roster against Clemson.
Now that the SEC’s normal penalties have been blocked, it is threatening the nuclear option. That looks a lot like an attempt to work around the Louisiana court’s ruling.
Actually expelling LSU would also be beyond idiotic financially.
According to LSU’s FY2025 financial reports:
LSU athletics generated between $199 million and $223 million, depending on the accounting report
LSU football generated approximately $112 million
LSU reportedly averaged around 6.4 million viewers for its rated games in 2025, sixth nationally
The SEC distributed approximately $1.03 billion to its schools last year. That money depends on television inventory, major matchups, postseason success and fan interest. LSU is one of the brands helping create that value.
You do not remove LSU and simply replace it with another school. The SEC would lose a founding member, a massive fan base, a national television draw and valuable matchups against Bama, Georgia, Texas, Oklahoma, Florida and A&M.
It would also invite years of litigation over media rights, conference distributions, scheduling and whether LSU was expelled for following a court order.
Meanwhile, the Big Ten or Big 12 would probably answer LSU’s call immediately. Handing another conference LSU’s brand, Louisiana recruiting and the Baton Rouge/New Orleans market would be an unbelievable act of self destruction.
Moving forward, LSU appears to be in a solid position as long as it follows the court orders and acts carefully. I cannot imagine 11 university presidents voting to remove LSU over two players who have not appeared in a game.
This is the SEC putting on a show for the federal court after getting slapped down in Louisiana. The threat is technically available, but actually following through would be one of the dumbest financial decisions in college athletics history.
But this feels almost entirely like theatrics by the SEC.
They are not seriously preparing to kick LSU out. They are putting the biggest possible threat on the table so they can argue in federal court that the conference, not a Louisiana judge, has the final authority to govern its members.
The SEC’s argument is that LSU voluntarily agreed to follow conference rules and cannot force the other schools to compete against players the SEC considers professionals. It is even making a First Amendment “freedom of association” argument.
That is not completely frivolous, but it feels extremely forced here.
LSU did not secretly play ineligible players. A Louisiana judge cleared the players to return and blocked the SEC from punishing LSU for using them. LSU still left them off the roster against Clemson.
Now that the SEC’s normal penalties have been blocked, it is threatening the nuclear option. That looks a lot like an attempt to work around the Louisiana court’s ruling.
Actually expelling LSU would also be beyond idiotic financially.
According to LSU’s FY2025 financial reports:
LSU athletics generated between $199 million and $223 million, depending on the accounting report
LSU football generated approximately $112 million
LSU reportedly averaged around 6.4 million viewers for its rated games in 2025, sixth nationally
The SEC distributed approximately $1.03 billion to its schools last year. That money depends on television inventory, major matchups, postseason success and fan interest. LSU is one of the brands helping create that value.
You do not remove LSU and simply replace it with another school. The SEC would lose a founding member, a massive fan base, a national television draw and valuable matchups against Bama, Georgia, Texas, Oklahoma, Florida and A&M.
It would also invite years of litigation over media rights, conference distributions, scheduling and whether LSU was expelled for following a court order.
Meanwhile, the Big Ten or Big 12 would probably answer LSU’s call immediately. Handing another conference LSU’s brand, Louisiana recruiting and the Baton Rouge/New Orleans market would be an unbelievable act of self destruction.
Moving forward, LSU appears to be in a solid position as long as it follows the court orders and acts carefully. I cannot imagine 11 university presidents voting to remove LSU over two players who have not appeared in a game.
This is the SEC putting on a show for the federal court after getting slapped down in Louisiana. The threat is technically available, but actually following through would be one of the dumbest financial decisions in college athletics history.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:45 pm to TIGERhype
quote:
LSU reportedly averaged around 6.4 million viewers for its rated games in 2025, sixth nationally
And that number is going to SKYROCKET.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:45 pm to TIGERhype
If this truly comes down to a 2/3s vote, what's to stop teams from taking the opportunity to boot LSU?
Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:45 pm to TIGERhype
quote:
The SEC’s expulsion threat is legally possible,
Doesnt mean it will be deemed legal. They will get sued into oblivion if they even tried to kick us out.
A judge literally included us from any sanctions if we rostered the players and people think they can decide to kick us out over a halftime comment?
Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:46 pm to LSUsmartass
Yea so what happens come Thursday and they get the votes needed?
Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:47 pm to TIGERhype
Thanks for the dissertation
Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:47 pm to TIGERhype
What do they hate more,,, losing money or LSU
Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:48 pm to TIGERhype
Highly unlikely they kick us out. But, the ACC and its grant of rights gets closer to expiring every day. They could be eyeing a replacement for us in a few years.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:48 pm to LSUsmartass
quote:
If this truly comes down to a 2/3s vote, what's to stop teams from taking the opportunity to boot LSU?
It would cost them money
A new tv contract without LSU would be millions less for each school
Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:49 pm to LSUsmartass
quote:
If this truly comes down to a 2/3s vote, what's to stop teams from taking the opportunity to boot LSU?
Cause it sets up it could happen to any of them as well.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:51 pm to TIGERhype
this is all correct
its about the SEC being able to enforce its rules on its members...not sure they win long term though. Ncaa essentially tried the same path...got arse kicked in court
in the end though everything you said is correct
SEC would also lose the case for damage to the brand, future earnings etc.....prolly close to the tune of 500 million of more.
its about the SEC being able to enforce its rules on its members...not sure they win long term though. Ncaa essentially tried the same path...got arse kicked in court
in the end though everything you said is correct
SEC would also lose the case for damage to the brand, future earnings etc.....prolly close to the tune of 500 million of more.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:52 pm to hg
quote:
Yea so what happens come Thursday and they get the votes needed
They are not voting on anything on thursday
Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:52 pm to TIGERhype
I gotta wonder why we did this. We don’t even seem to need those players.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:52 pm to TIGERhype
It comes down to money. The sec doesn’t want to kick LSU out bc LSU is a cash cow. They are just embarrassed and trying to save face. LSU doesn’t want to leave either. The LSU brand will be big anywhere, but the SEC is the easiest path to the dollar.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:52 pm to TIGERhype
Excellent post covering most everything. The one thing I keep bringing up is the SEC faces EXACTLY the same problem as the NCAA faced. The SEC keeps claiming it is "voluntary membership" organization. So what. The NCAA is a "voluntary membership" organization and how did they work for them. For some reason, the SEC and the Big 10 think they have anti-trust protection...they don't!
And notice they NEVER ever bring up the cause of this episode because they will lose in every court in the land. They discriminated against the 2022 class with their ridiculous timing of the 5 for 5 policy. They denied those players the right to make a choice BEFORE the drafts. This is a LOSING issue for them and they know it.
And notice they NEVER ever bring up the cause of this episode because they will lose in every court in the land. They discriminated against the 2022 class with their ridiculous timing of the 5 for 5 policy. They denied those players the right to make a choice BEFORE the drafts. This is a LOSING issue for them and they know it.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:53 pm to TIGERhype
This is why I want LSU to force the issue. Because the SEC is a Potemkin Village.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:54 pm to LSUsmartass
I'm not an attorney but i would imagine if they were to boot LSU, that would trigger a renegotiation between the SEC and ESPN/Disney for their media contract. Booting a brand like LSU massively devalues that media contract. Sure there are brands that are much larger than LSU in other sports, think UNC basketball, but football is still the driving force with these media contracts. There isn't a football brand big enough to replace LSU's place in the SEC that would generate the same revenue. I say all that to say, if they boot LSU, the media contract becomes worth less, which in turn means other member schools make less from the media contract.
Again, not an attorney, but that would be my thoughts. Think Texas/OU joining the SEC. Why would you vote to add programs that theoretically make your path to the playoff harder? Because they bring revenue to the conference and in turn, your school.
Again, not an attorney, but that would be my thoughts. Think Texas/OU joining the SEC. Why would you vote to add programs that theoretically make your path to the playoff harder? Because they bring revenue to the conference and in turn, your school.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:54 pm to TIGERhype
At this point, it would not be good for LSU to get kicked out of the SEC.
But also tired of the SEC holding this dagger at our throat. fricking do it then. We’ll figure it out and maybe we’ll be worse off but if you really want to do it we can’t stop you.
But also tired of the SEC holding this dagger at our throat. fricking do it then. We’ll figure it out and maybe we’ll be worse off but if you really want to do it we can’t stop you.
Popular
Back to top

17












