Started By
Message

The "call" explained

Posted on 6/27/17 at 11:19 pm
Posted by TigersD69
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2009
980 posts
Posted on 6/27/17 at 11:19 pm
Long story short that call comes down to what kind of baseball guy you are, either a purist or a technical guy. Baseball is a game of interpretive rules and human judgement. Example, when the ump is giving an inch off the plate to a pitcher hitting his spots is that technically a strike? No..so the technical guys jump up and down and screams foul, while the purist understands that this is simply the particular umps "zone" and the pitcher is being rewarded for hitting his spots. Furthermore when pitchers consistently violate the 45 degree angle interpretation rule is that "technically" a balk? Yes...But how many times do you actually see it called and a runner allowed to score from 3rd. The play at 2nd was a simply a technical call. The purist understands the situation and makes no call there b/c (and only b/c) the integrity of the DP was not affected. However I think it was obvious as to what kind of baseball guy we had umping 2nd tonight.

FWIW.... it did not ultimately affect the outcome...the baseball Gods tend to be funny like that.

This post was edited on 6/27/17 at 11:30 pm
Posted by DeathValley85
Member since May 2011
17108 posts
Posted on 6/27/17 at 11:20 pm to
quote:

FWIW.... it did not ultimately affect the outcome.


Bulllllllllllllllllllshite it didn't
Posted by jwall3
Member since Jun 2008
3029 posts
Posted on 6/27/17 at 11:20 pm to
Agree
Posted by TigersD69
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2009
980 posts
Posted on 6/27/17 at 11:21 pm to



quote:

Bulllllllllllllllllllshite it didn't


Did you miss the 4 run 8th?
This post was edited on 6/27/17 at 11:22 pm
Posted by Geauxld Finger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
31664 posts
Posted on 6/27/17 at 11:21 pm to
quote:

FWIW.... it did not ultimately affect the outcome...the baseball Gods tend to be funny like that.


The hell it didn't.
Posted by ForeverEllisHugh
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2016
14777 posts
Posted on 6/27/17 at 11:21 pm to
It was definitely not egregious enough to make that call in that situation.
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
79605 posts
Posted on 6/27/17 at 11:22 pm to
quote:

The play at 2nd was a simply a technical call. The purist understands the situation and makes no call there


If he hadn't called it, I find it highly doubtful O'Sullivan would've come out of the dugout to protest it. It was that hairline.
Posted by Carville
Sunshine, LA
Member since Jun 2014
5321 posts
Posted on 6/27/17 at 11:22 pm to
Bottom of the 8th face plant never happens if this call isn't made.
Posted by Tiger1988
Houston
Member since May 2016
24222 posts
Posted on 6/27/17 at 11:22 pm to
Agree.
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
70699 posts
Posted on 6/27/17 at 11:22 pm to
quote:

It was definitely not egregious enough to make that call in that situation.



Yeah it was, he spiked him in the shin and didn't even touch the bag.
Posted by SmackDaniels
Gulf Breeze, FL
Member since Mar 2007
15134 posts
Posted on 6/27/17 at 11:23 pm to
I can't remember such a huge amount of momentum coming to such a sudden stop.
Posted by jwall3
Member since Jun 2008
3029 posts
Posted on 6/27/17 at 11:23 pm to
There was nothing to protest as the double play happened anyway. That run not scoring is a crappy punishment for that slide
Posted by jwall3
Member since Jun 2008
3029 posts
Posted on 6/27/17 at 11:23 pm to
Wrong. One leg went over the bag
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98117 posts
Posted on 6/27/17 at 11:24 pm to
The 4 run 8th likely doesnt happen if we lead or are tied. The team collapsed after we failed to score.
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
70699 posts
Posted on 6/27/17 at 11:24 pm to
quote:

Wrong. One leg went over the bag



Well that's just wrong.
Posted by PaperTiger
Ruston, LA
Member since Feb 2015
22932 posts
Posted on 6/27/17 at 11:24 pm to
I think this is only relevant if slaughter reaches for second. He didn't even try to touch the bag. That's the big difference here
Posted by PaperTiger
Ruston, LA
Member since Feb 2015
22932 posts
Posted on 6/27/17 at 11:25 pm to
Not even close
Posted by easy money
Member since Feb 2005
14420 posts
Posted on 6/27/17 at 11:25 pm to
Isn't the 45 degree rule interpreted in itself? Doesn't the rule just state that a pitcher cannot make a motion to the plate?

Sorry, sidetracked. Yeah, I think that call is hard to avoid there. He didn't even touch the bag.
Posted by TigersD69
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2009
980 posts
Posted on 6/27/17 at 11:27 pm to
quote:

sn't the 45 degree rule interpreted in itself? Doesn't the rule just state that a pitcher cannot make a motion to the plate?



You are correct and I like you. It is obvious that you know your baseball. Cheers brother!
Posted by moock blackjack
Member since Apr 2008
96127 posts
Posted on 6/27/17 at 11:28 pm to
Bottom line that call should never been made there!! Run scoring was not effected by that play. No call was the correct decision!!
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram