- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So is LSU going with a wordmark on the football jerseys now?
Posted on 6/26/09 at 1:05 pm to LSUbase13
Posted on 6/26/09 at 1:05 pm to LSUbase13
quote:
The Tiger Eye should be used only on the field. FWIW I think it looks terrible on shirts, hats, etc.
FWIW, you're the only person that I've ever heard say some stupid shite like that. It's one of the better logos in all of college sports.
Posted on 6/26/09 at 1:08 pm to MightyYat
quote:
FWIW, you're the only person that I've ever heard say some stupid shite like that.
FWIW, I agree with with him. I think it looks great on the field, but it is a bit much for hats, t-shirts, etc.
Posted on 6/26/09 at 1:09 pm to Meursault
Will we EVER go back to the full arm striping?
Posted on 6/26/09 at 1:11 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Will we EVER go back to the full arm striping?
No, and neither will UCLA, Indianapolis Colts, or anybody that uses the three shoulder stripes. They didn't shorten it because they thought it would look better. They shortened it because it simply works for the players comfort-wise.
Posted on 6/26/09 at 1:11 pm to Meursault
quote:
FWIW, I agree with with him. I think it looks great on the field, but it is a bit much for hats, t-shirts, etc.
Really? This is the best coach's polo we've ever had.
Posted on 6/26/09 at 1:15 pm to MightyYat
I'm with MightyYat... if the helmet had to change, the only thing I'd like to see is the Eye on either side.
Posted on 6/26/09 at 1:15 pm to MightyYat
I'm with MightyYat... if the helmet had to change, the only thing I'd like to see is the Eye on either side.
Posted on 6/26/09 at 1:17 pm to MightyYat
I just don't care for it and I would never wear it. But that is just my own personal opinion. I prefer a more simple and basic shirt. I have a Cutter and Buck LSU golf polo I wear.
This post was edited on 6/26/09 at 1:18 pm
Posted on 6/26/09 at 1:32 pm to ThePenIsMightier
don't all SEC teams have the SEC logo there?
Posted on 6/26/09 at 1:33 pm to Meursault
Man they have some drama queen bitches on this board....It's a fricking minor addition, no need for some of you to
I know we have nothing to look forward to until football season but damn this is ridiculous
I know we have nothing to look forward to until football season but damn this is ridiculous
Posted on 6/26/09 at 2:09 pm to ITtigah
No, and neither will UCLA, Indianapolis Colts, or anybody that uses the three shoulder stripes. They didn't shorten it because they thought it would look better. They shortened it because it simply works for the players comfort-wise.
No the "UCLA stripes as they are called" went away when the sleeves went away on actual jerseys... and jerseys became as tight fitting as they are now.
No the "UCLA stripes as they are called" went away when the sleeves went away on actual jerseys... and jerseys became as tight fitting as they are now.
Posted on 6/26/09 at 2:25 pm to Meursault
quote:
Dude its the same jersey it has always been.
i said unis, which include pants and helmets. i think it would be interesting to see the changes, good and bad.
Posted on 6/26/09 at 2:29 pm to ChewyDante
well i guess everybody can find something to bitch about. I think it looks fine, its not like its an eye sore, and whats the big difference with not having the LSU on the front? its traditional? who gives two shits.
Posted on 6/26/09 at 2:36 pm to SofaKingTrill
i'm just wondering what's next, seems like every few years something get changed
Posted on 6/26/09 at 2:45 pm to NorthshoreTiger76
quote:
i'm just wondering what's next, seems like every few years something get changed
so what? that stuff doesnt bother me. its not like we're oregon
Posted on 6/26/09 at 2:47 pm to Meursault
If we really are going to this it will ruin an old SWC/Big XII criticism I have espoused for years.
For the 27 years I have lived in Texas I have made fun of all of their conference members having the school name on the front of their jersey. I have laughed at them and said, "I guess they can't remember who they are or they are worried no one knows who they are."
So much for my argument that everyone knows who we are so we don't have to put our name on our jerseys.
I was always just kidding when I said this but I relly have always thought it strange that the old SWC teams all had the names on the front like this.
For the 27 years I have lived in Texas I have made fun of all of their conference members having the school name on the front of their jersey. I have laughed at them and said, "I guess they can't remember who they are or they are worried no one knows who they are."
So much for my argument that everyone knows who we are so we don't have to put our name on our jerseys.
I was always just kidding when I said this but I relly have always thought it strange that the old SWC teams all had the names on the front like this.
Posted on 6/26/09 at 5:04 pm to lsufball19
quote:
adding a small "lsu" above our numbers just looks poorly done and looks like something that doesn't need to be there
Correct.
WHAT'S THE POINT of adding something that small and insignificant to the jersey? We haven't heard a definite affirmative from G String yet......
Posted on 6/26/09 at 5:06 pm to DBG
quote:Truer words have never been typed. It doesn't bother me at all.
i really think a lot of people will hate it just because its a change, no matter how small and unimportant it is
Posted on 6/26/09 at 5:07 pm to PnG Exsanguination
quote:
Truer words have never been typed. It doesn't bother me at all.
+1,000
Posted on 6/26/09 at 5:24 pm to HeartOfGeauxld
I am not going to lose sleep over it, just don't think it is needed.
Popular
Back to top


2






