
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So how does a court order override NCAA and not the SEC
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:04 pm to lurking
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:04 pm to lurking
quote:
They’ve severely limited their opportunities and earning potential. You can’t argue they’d make the same in the SWAC.
Once again, they are not being forced to go play in the SWAC. All of these players can sign, play, and get paid by a SEC school.
quote:
Only because they continue to pretend these are student athletes. I imagine that will be challenged soon too.
Whether it will be challenged soon or not does not matter at all. At this moment, they are not employees of the SEC, and there is no argument to claim that they are.
This post was edited on 8/25/26 at 9:04 pm
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:04 pm to LSBoosie
He means they made their decision to go pro bc Ncaa said they were out of eligibility. They weren't ooe they had 1 more yr and ncaa decides to exclude class of 22 out of the 5 to play 5. Why? That was bullshite.This won't happen again in the future with the rules now in place.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:11 pm to dallastigers
I’m not sure, but the NCAA 5 for 5 rule and thus the lawsuit all came well after the draft, which they were automatically entered in believing they were out of eligibility.
With all that said, this all has gotten completely out of hand and I’m glad someone is attempting to rein it in. Covid ruined everything
With all that said, this all has gotten completely out of hand and I’m glad someone is attempting to rein it in. Covid ruined everything
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:15 pm to tampacajun
quote:
You mean the NFL...lololol
You're arguing in bad faith
I’m not arguing in any bad faith. I didn’t know if he was referring to their commitment to the NFL or commitment to the school they were planning on playing for. It was a legitimate question.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:26 pm to tampacajun
I’m not disagreeing with you
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:50 pm to dltigers3
quote:
Yes
A judge did it, not the ncaa. The ncaa passed a rule change that was pretty clear who would be eligible.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 10:09 pm to notbilly
For the record, NCAA membership is voluntary as well.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 10:14 pm to LSBoosie
quote:
The SEC is punishing the schools not the players. So the schools would have to be the one's to sue the SEC. That seems unlikely considering the schools unanimously voted to approve this rule today.
I don't think that's going to hold water.
The SECs actions result in an illegal restraint of trade. It's member institutions are all members of the NCAA.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 10:42 pm to moneyg
No you are dead wrong. If this federal court and you have anything to do with ignoring their order, you can be dragged by US Marshalls to the judge for a contempt hearing, no matter who the hell you are, even a sitting or former US President.
(Don’t ask how I know, but I personally know)
(Don’t ask how I know, but I personally know)
Posted on 8/25/26 at 11:03 pm to tampacajun
quote:
Ok. Fair. But this has already played out with Sorsby. Conferences can dole out any punishment they see fit. They aren't enjoined by the SC decision. Sorry...it's the facts. It's a voluntary membership.
First off, Sorsby called off the dogs before that got adjudicated. We don't know how that would have played out.
Secondly, the NCAA is an organization of 300+ member institutions. The SEC is an organization of 16 member institutions. The 16 schools in the SEC are also in the NCAA. Calling themselves something different does not release them from the original TRO, nor does the SEC creating a new rule change the problem being litigated. It's actually the same thing all over again...changing the rules after the fact.
All this does is pretty much guarantee that the SEC and the NCAA will get sued again, and they will lose again and have to play tens of millions of more dollars in damages to these players (for the eligibility denial and the collusion to circumvent a court order) all because they cannot admit they made a mistake.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 6:09 am to notbilly
quote:
judge did it, not the ncaa. The ncaa passed a rule change that was pretty clear who would be eligible.
Ok, but the NCAA rule didn’t even come out until after the draft, and therefore the judges order
The NCAA also ruled Chambliss ineligible multiple times. Clearly they aren’t in charge anymore
Posted on 8/26/26 at 6:30 am to LSBoosie
It's tortious interference no matter who is doing it. These athletes sued and won. It's not just football either. Conferences can't make up rules that have the same effect of that which the court has already enjoined. They can't punish schools to produce the same tortious result.
This post was edited on 8/26/26 at 6:33 am
Posted on 8/26/26 at 6:36 am to jawnybnsc
Ok… We’ll see if you’re right
Posted on 8/26/26 at 6:39 am to LSBoosie
quote:
The SEC is punishing the schools not the players
Wrong - the rule is totally punishing the players. Now the 2022 players have been first told by the NCAA, you dont have any eligibility, you have to declare for the NFL draft. Then after they declare, the NCAA says "oops sorry, you did in fact have eligibility" - so the player says great, Im coming back to school to use my eligibility you told me I have under 5x5. Now after they sign a contract with the school to use that eligibility the SEC comes and says, oh wait, you signed with the NFL? - you cant come back or we will suspend your school for taking you.
These kids are just trying to use that year the NCAA promised them, and they are getting screwed at every turn. Last I checked this is still America, you cannot frick with a persons God given right to make cheese
This post was edited on 8/26/26 at 6:41 am
Posted on 8/26/26 at 6:46 am to CWILKS3
quote:
The SEC’s argument here is going to be that the NCAA can allow those players to be eligible, that does not mean that we are not allowed to enforce rules that we set forth as a conference and vote unanimously on.
You can set whatever rules you want but if those rules are in direct opposition to a court order you will have to answer to the judge and explain why you created rules days after his order that make his order null and void
Posted on 8/26/26 at 6:48 am to TheRouxGuru
quote:
The players forfeited that last year of eligibility when they declared for the draft in my opinion
You can't forfeit something you don't know that you have. Again, most of these players would have come back to school under 5 for 5.
Why is this particular detail so hard to get people to understand? It's not f***ing rocket science.
This post was edited on 8/26/26 at 6:49 am
Posted on 8/26/26 at 6:59 am to Jabontik
quote:
These kids are just trying to use that year the NCAA promised them, and they are getting screwed at every turn.
The NCAA didn’t promise them anything. Random judges across the US did.
quote:
Last I checked this is still America, you cannot frick with a persons God given right to make cheese
All of these guys can still go make cheese however they would like.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 7:36 am to Buga
quote:
You can't forfeit something you don't know that you have. Again, most of these players would have come back to school under 5 for 5.
Why is this particular detail so hard to get people to understand? It's not f***ing rocket science.
Lot of dummies on here haven't looked at it from the player's point of view. Just a redline of pure amateur status, in 2026. If you're a bubble player who thinks he only has 4 years, you act accordingly. Most all knew their draft stock at that time UFA or camp arm or bubble roster. If they had a 5th year, 100% of them would have used it. If a bunch of similarly situated 2022 athletes get 5 years, but you didn't know you'd have 5 or didn't get the 5 because the NCAA acted late (by 2 months because meh holidays) or arbitrarily, then that is called an equal protection issue (schools as a government actor by abiding by the NCAA). SEC is duplicating the rule and carrying the NCAA's water on the NCAA's error and then asserting they are not a party to the court ruling. Ok. The intellectual dishonesty of "oh, they can do it, but the SEC can punish them ...." not harming the student's prospects is pure bunk.
The rule itself isn't a bad rule, but made after this just occurred specifically to block the 2022 entrants from their 5th year (versus all future years where a lost 5th year isn't a glaring equal protection violation) is the hole in the donut. If they were worth a shite, they'd make the rule effective next year so as not to worsen the sequalae of the NCAA's effup. SEC, you can have your rule, but you can't hose the 2022 entrants who have an equal protection issue that they have raised prior and been granted relief on.
The Kiffen Derangement Syndrome is incredible. There are dozens of 2022 football players affected by this and maybe 3 were going to LSU, and every media idiot seems solely focused on CLK. Instead of asking why these football players should not get their 5th like every other similarly situated 2022 entrant, or why are they getting effectively blocked from the two best and highest paying conferences (cartel behavior), the media and the OM Boards are just Lane is eviiiiil, Lane baaaaaad. I feel bad for those jilted OM fans, they are burnt.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 8:07 am to Jabontik
quote:
Wrong - the rule is totally punishing the players. Now the 2022 players have been first told by the NCAA, you dont have any eligibility, you have to declare for the NFL draft. Then after they declare, the NCAA says "oops sorry, you did in fact have eligibility" - so the player says great, Im coming back to school to use my eligibility you told me I have under 5x5. Now after they sign a contract with the school to use that eligibility the SEC comes and says, oh wait, you signed with the NFL? - you cant come back or we will suspend your school for taking you.
These kids are just trying to use that year the NCAA promised them, and they are getting screwed at every turn. Last I checked this is still America, you cannot frick with a persons God given right to make cheese
Sankey really did coward his way out by following Ohio State...i mean "the big 10" on this ruling.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 8:26 am to Hitman1381
I kinda hope the conferences take control and figure out a way to butt out the courts. Really the legal courts should have no place in the eligibility of college athletes IMO, that should come down to the NCAA or whatever organization all the major conferences create to govern it.

Popular
Back to top

0







