- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So how does a court order override NCAA and not the SEC
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:01 pm to dltigers3
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:01 pm to dltigers3
quote:
Yes
I thought a judge did this. The original ruling being that first year class starting in fall of 2022 was only class that didn’t get an extra year like future and prior ones.
Can’t remember if that is the one that got stayed on appeal or if it was another earlier ruling.
1
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:04 pm to lurking
quote:
They’ve severely limited their opportunities and earning potential. You can’t argue they’d make the same in the SWAC.
Once again, they are not being forced to go play in the SWAC. All of these players can sign, play, and get paid by a SEC school.
quote:
Only because they continue to pretend these are student athletes. I imagine that will be challenged soon too.
Whether it will be challenged soon or not does not matter at all. At this moment, they are not employees of the SEC, and there is no argument to claim that they are.
This post was edited on 8/25/26 at 9:04 pm
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:04 pm to LSBoosie
He means they made their decision to go pro bc Ncaa said they were out of eligibility. They weren't ooe they had 1 more yr and ncaa decides to exclude class of 22 out of the 5 to play 5. Why? That was bullshite.This won't happen again in the future with the rules now in place.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:11 pm to dallastigers
I’m not sure, but the NCAA 5 for 5 rule and thus the lawsuit all came well after the draft, which they were automatically entered in believing they were out of eligibility.
With all that said, this all has gotten completely out of hand and I’m glad someone is attempting to rein it in. Covid ruined everything
With all that said, this all has gotten completely out of hand and I’m glad someone is attempting to rein it in. Covid ruined everything
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:14 pm to LSBoosie
You mean the NFL...lololol
You're arguing in bad faith
You're arguing in bad faith
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:15 pm to tampacajun
quote:
You mean the NFL...lololol
You're arguing in bad faith
I’m not arguing in any bad faith. I didn’t know if he was referring to their commitment to the NFL or commitment to the school they were planning on playing for. It was a legitimate question.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:18 pm to LSBoosie
Ok. Fair. But this has already played out with Sorsby. Conferences can dole out any punishment they see fit. They aren't enjoined by the SC decision. Sorry...it's the facts. It's a voluntary membership.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:26 pm to tampacajun
I’m not disagreeing with you
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:50 pm to dltigers3
quote:
Yes
A judge did it, not the ncaa. The ncaa passed a rule change that was pretty clear who would be eligible.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 10:09 pm to notbilly
For the record, NCAA membership is voluntary as well.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News