- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Shaw's response to Sternberger fumble
Posted on 11/28/18 at 10:21 am to RATeamWannabe
Posted on 11/28/18 at 10:21 am to RATeamWannabe
quote:
Your purple and gold glasses are showing
And your lack of football knowledge just showed up as well. Then again....what would a Kansas person know about football?
Posted on 11/28/18 at 10:23 am to tigerburningbright75
hmmmm....a small piece of something resembling accountability from SEC headquarters...
maybe they heard that caller on the radio yesterday that compared their transparency to that of the Vatican!!!
maybe they heard that caller on the radio yesterday that compared their transparency to that of the Vatican!!!
Posted on 11/28/18 at 10:24 am to LNCHBOX
bullshite. he caught the ball and turned towards the endzone with the ball tucked. the sec office is gonna say what they want to. when is the last time that they ever said their shitty refs made a bad call.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 10:27 am to countrytiger60
The more interesting part of Shaw's statement was that he admitted the PI call on Greedy was incorrect. They were able to whitewash all of the calls but that one.
I'm not surprised Shaw is covering for the refs. In a way, that's his job, so I'm not really bothered by it. So for him to publicly say an official used poor judgment is bureaucratic speak for "he screwed up big time."
I'm not surprised Shaw is covering for the refs. In a way, that's his job, so I'm not really bothered by it. So for him to publicly say an official used poor judgment is bureaucratic speak for "he screwed up big time."
Posted on 11/28/18 at 10:29 am to pellietigersaint
quote:And whining about it after it’s said and done won’t change it. Grow up.
spacing 5 times between words doesn't emphasize your point, only your ignorance
Posted on 11/28/18 at 10:32 am to foghat
That play was at least close. Their fatass def tackle jumped offsides about 4 times with only 1 being called. The whole thing was ridiculous. 3 freaking penalties the entire game for Aggie? 

Posted on 11/28/18 at 10:33 am to pellietigersaint
quote:Complaining about officiating is far less futile.
spacing 5 times between words doesn't emphasize your point, only your ignorance
Posted on 11/28/18 at 10:46 am to Baloo
quote:
The more interesting part of Shaw's statement was that he admitted the PI call on Greedy was incorrect. They were able to whitewash all of the calls but that one.
I'm not. I was expecting Shaw to at least be accountable for one of the six. I was honestly expecting him to admit the fumble, but that ends the game (again) in LSU's favor.
At least with the Greedy PI call, they can say it technically didn't end the game, even though it did lead to a second chance that did.
I saw many LSU posters here yesterday buying the narrative that because aTm was offsides on their next attempt, that somehow "evened out" the call on Williams. LOLOLOL
My poor brain cannot process that type of acceptance. The call on Greedy isn't made, we go to OT8....
Posted on 11/28/18 at 10:48 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
We did not get screwed by the refs. There were about 6 50/50 calls that all went against us.
Eh.. statistically speaking, losing six 50/50 calls kind of is getting screwed. If they are truly 50/50 and any one of them would have changed the outcome, then it means the officials give LSU at least one game-winning call 98.4% of the time..
Posted on 11/28/18 at 10:49 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
We did not get screwed by the refs. There were about 6 50/50 calls that all went against us. It sucks but that’s football.
So 100% of the 50/50 calls all went to A&M.
We got screwed.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 10:49 am to LNCHBOX
quote:is that the rule.
didn't take two steps with possession of the ball. Hate to break it to yal
Posted on 11/28/18 at 10:50 am to lostinbr
quote:
Eh.. statistically speaking, losing six 50/50 calls kind of is getting screwed
Do you think there were only 6 close calls in the entire game?
The DW40 strip was a really close to being ruled down and could have gone ether way, but we got that one. That's just one. I'm sure there were several more. We just choose to ignore those since they went our way.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 10:55 am to Baloo
Shaw will not throw the refs under the bus. I think if this would've been against Bama, I think his take would be different.
Lets say Shaw is right about it not being a catch, the issue is that it was a close play and should've been reviewed. The ref blew the whistle after LSU was 15 yds down the field. They shouldn't have blown the play dead and let it play out like it shouldve. Then review it to get it right.
The were careful to let the Knee play complete and then come back and review it. They were careful to review the spike play after time ran out and put 1 second back on the clock. So these plays were overturned which hurt LSU and were very close.
But the play that benefited LSU that was just as close (Sternberger fumble) was not allowed to finish so that it could be reviewed. The issue is not necessarily the catch and fumble but the fact the play was blown dead and couldn't be reviewed.
Lets say Shaw is right about it not being a catch, the issue is that it was a close play and should've been reviewed. The ref blew the whistle after LSU was 15 yds down the field. They shouldn't have blown the play dead and let it play out like it shouldve. Then review it to get it right.
The were careful to let the Knee play complete and then come back and review it. They were careful to review the spike play after time ran out and put 1 second back on the clock. So these plays were overturned which hurt LSU and were very close.
But the play that benefited LSU that was just as close (Sternberger fumble) was not allowed to finish so that it could be reviewed. The issue is not necessarily the catch and fumble but the fact the play was blown dead and couldn't be reviewed.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 10:56 am to foghat
His “act common to the game” was taking 2-3 running steps with the ball secured. 

Posted on 11/28/18 at 10:59 am to LNCHBOX
quote:no, just no
DW40 strip was a really close to being ruled down and could have gone ether way
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:02 am to tigerfoot
quote:
no, just no
I mean, it was very close. The right call was made IMO, but it easily could have been called differently on the field.
But of course you're not willing to hear that any close calls went our way. They all went to Aggie and that's the reason we lost.

Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:02 am to Draconian Sanctions
That fumble was not 50/50.....it was at best 90/10
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:12 am to foghat
Get real. Switch out Bama for LSU. If anyone thinks this call would not have been a fumble for Bama, then they are high.
If this “catch” was on the goaline for A&M, you bet it would have been a touchdown.
The fact that the play was never reviewed tells you all you need to know.
If this “catch” was on the goaline for A&M, you bet it would have been a touchdown.
The fact that the play was never reviewed tells you all you need to know.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:12 am to foghat
He may be right that by rule it’s not a catch.
But that’s a stupid rule. If you have the ball in your hands and aren’t bobbling it, that should be a catch.
But that’s a stupid rule. If you have the ball in your hands and aren’t bobbling it, that should be a catch.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:15 am to LNCHBOX
Of course I am
We were given a very favorable spot once
I don’t yhink the Sternberger call is overturned. He made a football move but I believe it would show he never clearly possessed the ball
The DW strip was clearly the correct call. If not called and challenged the play would be reversed.
We were given a very favorable spot once
I don’t yhink the Sternberger call is overturned. He made a football move but I believe it would show he never clearly possessed the ball
The DW strip was clearly the correct call. If not called and challenged the play would be reversed.
This post was edited on 11/28/18 at 11:16 am
Back to top
